Discipline in public and religious elementary and secondary schools a comparative analysis

Journal of Research on Christian Education

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 51-74

  Denig, Stephen ^a  

^a ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900481739     PISSN: 10656219     EISSN: 19344945     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10656219909484881     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Albertson, L. M., & Kagan, D. M. (1987). Occupational stress among teachers. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(1), 69-75.
2. Appleberry, J. B., & Hoy, W. K. (1969). The pupil-control ideology of professional personnel in "open" and "closed" elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 5(3), 74-85.
3. Brenneman, O. N., Willower, D. J., & Lynch, P. D. (1975. Teacher self-acceptance, acceptance of others, and pupil-control ideology. Journal of Experimental Education, 44(1), 14-17.
4. Bryk, A. S.,&Driscoll, M. E. (1988). The high school as community: Contextual influences, and consequences for students and teachers. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 302 539)
5. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Cadavid, V, & Lunenburg, F. C. (1991). Locus of control, pupil-control ideology, and dimensions of teacher burnout. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 333 560)
7. Carlson, R. O. (1964). Environmental constraints and organizational consequences: The public school and its clients. InD. Griffiths (Ed), Behavioral science and educational administration (pp. 262-276). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Coleman, J. S. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
9. Convey, J. J. (1992). Catholic schools make a difference: Twenty-five years of research. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
10. Deibert, J., & Hoy, W. (1977). Custodial high schools and self-actualization of students. Educational Research Quarterly, 2(2), 24-31.
11. Delaney, K., & Sykes, G (1988). Making the case for professionalism. In A. Liebman (Ed.), Building a professional structure in schools (pp. 3 -22). New York: Teachers College Press.
12. DiPrete, T. A. (1981). Discipline and order in American high schools: Contractor report. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 224 137)
13. Durkheim, E. (1961). Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education (E. K. Wilson & H. Schnurer, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
14. Elam, S. M., Rose, L. C, & Gallup, A. M. (1993). The 25th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(2), 137-152.
15. Erickson, D. A. (1994). Insight and confusion in a private-school study. Private School Monitor, 15(A), 1-21.
16. Estep, L. E., Willower, D. J., & Licata, J. W. (1980. Teacher pupil-control ideology and behavior as predictors of classroom robustness. High School Journal, 63(4), 155-159.
17. Foley, W. J., & Brooks, R. (1978. Pupil-control ideology in predicting teacher discipline referrals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 14(3), 104-112.
18. Gaffney, P. V. (1997). A test reliability of an abbreviated version of the Pupil Control Ideology form. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 422)
19. Gaffney, P. V., & Byrd-Gaffney, S. (1996). An investigation into the test reliability of the Pupil Control Ideology form. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 098)
20. Gibson, D. R. (1970). The role of the primary-and secondary-school teacher. Educational Research, 73(1), 20-27.
21. Gilbert, D. C, & Levinson, D. J., (1957). "Custodialism" and "humanism" in mental hospital structure and in staff ideology. In M. Greenblatt, D. J. Levinson. & R. H. Williams (Eds), The patient and the mental hospital (pp. 20-35). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
22. Halpin, QGoldenberg, R.,& Halpin, G. (1974). Are creative teachers more humanistic in their pupil-control ideologies? Journal of Creative Behavior, 7(4), 282-286.
23. Halpin, G, Halpin, G, & Harris, K. (1982). Personality characteristics and self-concept of preservice teachers related to their pupil-control orientation. Journal of Experimental Education, 50(1), 195-199.
24. Harris, K. R., Halpin, G,& Halpin, G. (1985. Teacher characteristics and stress. Journal of Educational Research, 78(6), 346-50.
25. Helsel, A. R. (1971. Status obeisance and pupil-control ideology. Journal of Educational Administration, 9(1), 38-47.
26. Hoy, W. K. (1968. The influence of experience on the beginning teacher. School Review, 76(3), 312-323.
27. Hoy, W. K. (1969). Pupil-control ideology and organizational socialization: A further examination of the influence of experience on the beginning teacher. School Review, 77 (3-4), 257-265.
28. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. (1990. Socialization of student teachers. American Education Research Journal, 27(2), 279-300.
29. Hoy, W. K., & Appleberry, J. B. (1970). Teacher-principal relationships in "humanistic" and "custodial" elementary schools. Journal of Experimental Education, 39, 27-31.
30. Jones, D. R. (1982. Influence of the length and level of student teaching on pupil-control ideology. High School Journal, 65(1), 220-225.
31. Jones- Wilson, F. (1992). Why not public schools? Journal of Negro Education, 61(2), 125-137.
32. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed). Philadelphia: Holt, Rienhart and Winston.
33. Kottamp, R. B., & Mulhern, J. A. (1987. Teacher expectancy motivation, open to closed climate and pupil-control ideology in high schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(2), 9-18.
34. Lunenburg, F. C. (1984. "Custodial" teachers: Negative effects on schools. Clearing House, 58(3), 112-116.
35. Lunenburg, F. C. (1986). Disipline and learning in Chicago schools. Chicago: Loyola University of Chicago.
36. Lunenburg, F. C. (1990a). Teacher pupil-control ideology and behavior as predictors of classroom environment: Public and Catholic schools compared. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322 115)
37. Lunenburg, F. C. (1990b). Educators’Pupil-Control Ideology as a predictor of educator’s reactions to pupil disruptive behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321 361)
38. Lunenburg, F. C, & O’Reilly, R. R. (1974). Personal and organizational influence on pupil-control ideology. Journal of Experimental Education, 42(3), 31-35
39. Lunenburg, F. C, & Schmidt, L.J. (1989. Pupil-control ideology, pupil control behavior, and the quality of school life. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22(4), 36-44.
40. O’Brien, T. F. (1985). Counseling and religion: How they mix in a parochial school setting. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Association for Counseling and Development, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 275 983)
41. Packwood, J. S. (1988). The pupil-control studies. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (pp. 185-207). New York. Longman.
42. Paschal, B. J., & Treloar, J. H. (1979. A longitudinal study of attitude change in prospective and beginning elementary-school teachers. The Teacher Educator, 15(1), 2-9.
43. Rafilides, M., & Hoy, W. K. (1971. Student sense of alienation and pupil-control orientation of high schools. High School Journal, 55(3), 101-111.
44. Schmidt, L. J. (1992. Relationship between pupil control ideology and the quality of school life. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 1(2), 103-110.
45. Schmidt, L. J., & Jacobson, M. H. (1990). Pupil control in the school climate. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 692)
46. Shearin, W. H, Jr. (1982. The relationship between student alienation and extent of faculty agreement on pupil-control ideology. High School Journal, 66(1), 32-35.
47. Silberman, C. (1970). Crisis in the classroom. New York, Random House.
48. Thomas, B. R. (1990). The school as a moral learning community. In J. I. Goodlad, R. Soder, & K. A. Sirotnik (Eds.), The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 266-295). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49. Veenman, S. (1984. Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(1), 143-178.
50. Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
51. Willower, D. J. (1975. Some comments on inquiries on school and student control. Teachers College Record, 77(2), 219-230.
52. Willower, D. J., Eidell, T. L., and Hoy, W. K. (1967). The school and pupil-control ideology. (Pennsylvania State Studies Mongraph No. 24). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
53. Willower, D. J., & Landis, C. A. (1971. Pupil-control ideology and professional orientation of school faculty. Journal of Secondary Education, 45(3), 118-123.
54. Willower, D. J., & Lawrence, J. D. (1979. Teachers’ perception of student threat to teacher status and teacher pupil-control ideology. Psychology in the Schools, 16(4), 586-590.
55. Yeager, R. J., Benson, B. L., Guerra, M. J., & Manno, B. V. (1985). The Catholic high school: A national portrait. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.