Carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier placement at primary cesarean delivery and outcomes at repeat cesarean delivery

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 123, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 923-928

  Edwards, Rodney K ^a   Ingersoll, Melissa ^a   Gerkin, Richard D ^a   Bodea Braescu, Ana V ^a   Lin, Monique G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Phoenix Perinatal Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; DRUG CARRIER;

ADHESION BARRIER; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HYSTEROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PELVIS ABSCESS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN INCISION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BODY MASS; PROCEDURES; SUTURING METHOD; TIME; TISSUE ADHESIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BODY MASS INDEX; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE SODIUM; CESAREAN SECTION; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; DRUG CARRIERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; OPERATIVE TIME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ADHESIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900447855     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000220     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Wilson EC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2012;61: 1-72.
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011;60: 1-70.
3. MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends and outcomes. Clin Perinatol 2008;35: 293-307, v.
4. Morales KJ, Gordon MC, Bates GW Jr. Postcesarean delivery adhesions associated with delayed delivery of infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196: 461.e1-6.
5. Greenberg MB, Daniels K, Blumenfeld YJ, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ. Do adhesions at repeat cesarean delay delivery of the newborn? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205: 380.e1-5.
6. Albright CM, Rouse DJ. Adhesion barriers at cesarean delivery: advertising compared with the evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118: 157-60.
7. Fushiki H, Ikoma T, Kobayashi H, Yoshimoto H. Efficacy of Seprafilm as an adhesion prevention barrier in cesarean section [in Japanese]. Obstet Gynecol Treat 2005;91: 557-61.
8. Seprafilm adhesion barrier and cesarean delivery. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00565643. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
9. Seprafilm for Prevention of Adhesions at Repeat Cesarean (SPARC). Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT 00697606. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
10. A trial to reduce adhesions following a primary cesarean section. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT 01819467. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
11. Conner SN, Tuuli MG, Longman RE, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Impact of obesity on incision-todelivery interval and neonatal outcomes at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209: 386.e1-6.
12. Bristow RE, Santillan A, Diaz-Montes TP, Gardner GJ, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Peeler ST. Prevention of adhesion formation after radical hysterectomy using a sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104: 739-46.