Genre and Layout in Multimodal Documents: Towards an Empirical Account

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-99-04, Issue , 1999, Pages 27-34

  Allen, Patrick ^a   Bateman, John ^b   Delin, Judy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACROSS TIME; MULTI-MODAL; SIMPLE++;

BIRDS;

EID: 84900444814     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Ames, S. Elements of Newspaper Design. 1989. New York:Praeger.
2. Arens, Y. and Hovy,E. 1990. Howto describe what? towards a theory of modality utilization. In The Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 487-494. Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
3. Bateman,J. A. andTeich, E. 1995.Selective information presentationin anintegrated publicationsystem:an application of genre-driventext generation. InformationProcessing and Management:an international journal, 31(5):753-768, September.
4. Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. Harlow,U.K.: Longman.
5. Cafford, D. 1965.Alinguistic theol, of translation. Oxford: OxfordUniversityPress.
6. Christie, F. andMartin, J. R. 1997..Genreandinstitu-tions: social processesin the workplaceandschool. London:Cassell.
7. Danes, F. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organisation of the text. In Danes,F. ed. Paperson Functional Sentence Perspective. 106-128. Prague: Academia.
8. Feiner, S. 1988. A grid-based approach to automating display layout. In Proceedingsof the GraphicsInterface, pages 192-197, Los Angeles, CA.: MorganKaufman.
9. Feiner, S. and McKeown, K. R. 1990. Coordinating text and graphics in explanation generation. In AAAI-90:Proceedingsof the 8th NationalConferenceon Artificial Intelligence, volumeI. 442 - 449. MenloPark, CA.:AAAI Press and TheMITPress.
10. Gler. R. 1990. Fachtextsortenim Englischen. Ttibingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
11. Gmf. W. 1992. Constraint-based layout of multimodal presentations. Technical Report RR-92-15, DFKI,Germany.
12. Graf. W.1995. The constraint-based layout framework laylab and its applications. In Proceedingsof ACMWorkshopon Effective Abstractions in Multimedia,Layoutand Interaction, San Francisco, CA.: ACM.
13. Hasan,R. Thenursery tale as a genre. In C. Cloran, D. Butt, andG. Williams, editors, Waysof saying, waysof meaning:selected papers of RuqaiyaHasan,pages 51-72. Cassell, London.
14. HatimB. and Mason,I 1990. Discourseandthe translator. London:Longman.
15. Hovy, E. and Arens, Y. 1991. Automatic generation of formatted text. In Proceedingsof the 8th. Conferenceof the AmericanAssociation for Artifical Intelligence. 92-96. Anaheim, CA.: AAAI.
16. Kerpedjiev,S., Carenini, G., Roth,S., andMoore,J 1997. Integrating planningand task-based design for multimedia presentation. In Proceedingsof lUI-97.
17. Kittredge, R. and Lehrberger, J. eds. 1982. Sublanguage: Studies of languagein restricted semantic domains.Berlin and NewYork:de Gruyter.
18. Kress, G. and van l_g, euwen,T. 1998. Front pages: the (critical) analysis of newspaperlayout. In Bell, A. and Garrett, P. eds. Approachesto MediaDiscourse. 186-219. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Mann,W.C. and Thompson, S. A. 1987. Rhetorical structure theory: a theory of text organization. TechnicalReport RS-87-190USC/InformationSciences Institute Reprintseries.
20. Marks, J.W. 1991. A formal specification scheme for network diagrams. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing,2(4):395-414.
21. Maybury,M. T. 1999. Research in multimedia and mul-timodal parsing and generationn. Artificial Intelligence Review. Forthcoming.
22. Mittal, V.,Roth,S., Moore,J., Mattis, J., andCarenini, G. 1995. Generating explanatory captions for information graphics. In Proceedingsof the 14th. International Joint Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), volume 2, pages 1276-1283. Montrtai, Canada.
23. Neal, J. G., andShapiro, S. C. 1991. Intelligent multimedia interface technology.In J.W. Sullivan and S.W.Tyler, editors, Intelligent UserInterfaces. Frontier Series. New York: ACMPress.
24. Negrine.R. 1994.Politics andthe MassMediain Britain. London:Routledge.
25. Reichenberger, K., Rondhuis, K., Kleinz, J., and. Bateman, J. 1996. Effective presentation of information throughpage layout: a linguistically-based approach. In Effective Abstractionsin Multimedia,LayoutandInteraction, San Francisco, CA.:.ACMMultimedia’95.
26. Roth, S. F. and Mattis, J. 1991. Automatingthe presentation of information. In Proceedingsof the IEEEConference on A1 Applications. 90-97. MiamiBeach, FL.: IEEE.
27. Sefton, P. M. 1990. Makingplans for Nigel (or defining interfaces betweencomputationalrepresentations of linguistic structure and output systems: Addingintonation, punctuation and typography systems to the PENMAN system). Technical report, Linguistic Department,University of Sydney,Sydney,Australia.
28. Snell-Homby.M. 1988. Translation Studies - An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
29. Swales. J. M.1990. GenreAnalysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.
30. Wahlster, W., Andrt, E., Graf, W., and Rist, T. 1991. Designing illustrated texts: howlanguageproduction is in-fluencedby the graphics generation. In Proceedingsof the 5th. Conferenceof the EuropeanChapterof the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. Wahlster, W., Andrt, E., Finkler, W., Profitlich, H., and Rist, T. 1993. Plan-basedintegration of natural language and graphics generation. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1-2):387-427.