Reformulated gasoline

Economic Analyses at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 391-418

  Anderson, Robert C ^a   Rykowski, Richard A ^b  

^a Resource Consulting Associates   (United States)

^b Air Improvement Resource Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900437297     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Anderson, Robert C. and Thomas J. Lareau. 1992. The Cost-Effectiveness of Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs. Research Paper 067. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute.
2. Bonner and Moore. 1993. Study of the Effects of Fuel Parameter Changes on the Cost of Producing Reformulated Gasoline. Houston: Bonner and Moore Management Science
3. Deal, David T. 1992. Mobile Source Fuels and Fuel Additives. In Timothy A. Van-derver Jr. (ed.) Clean Air Law and Regulation Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
4. Deal, David T. 1996. Personal communication with the authors, February 16,1996. (David T. Deal is managing attorney with the American Petroleum Institute.)
5. Gushee, David. 1996. Alternative Transportation Fuels and Clean Gasoline: Background and Regulatory Issues. (IB91008). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
6. Lareau, Thomas J. 1994. Improving Cost-Effectiveness Estimation: A Reassessment of Control Options to Reduce Ozone Precursor Emissions. Research Study 075. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute.
7. McConnell, Virginia D. and Winston Harrington. 1992. Cost-Effectiveness of Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs. Discussion Paper QE92-18. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
8. Pechan (E.H. Pechan & Associates and Mathtech, Inc.). 1994. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Petroleum Industry NESHAP, Revised Draft. Prepared for the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Washington, D.C.: U.S. EPA.
9. Ragsdale, Ralph. 1994. U.S. Refiners Choosing Variety of Routes to Produce Clean Fuels. Oil and Gas Journal. March 21, pp. 51-7.
10. Sierra Research. 1995. Institutional Support Programs for Alternative Fuels and Alternative Fuel Vehicles in California. Prepared for Western States Petroleum Association. Sacremento: Sierra Research.
11. U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. 1989. Catching Our Breath: Next Steps for Reducing Urban Ozone. OTA-O-412. Washington, D.C.: U.S. GPO.
12. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1991. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives; Standards for Reformulated Gasoline Proposed Rule. 56 Federal Register 31176.
13. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1992. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives. Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Proposed Rule. 57 Federal Register 13416.
14. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1993a. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives; Standards for Reformulated Gasoline Proposed Rule. 58 Federal Register 11722.
15. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1993b. Final Regulatory Impact Analysis for Reformulated Gasoline. (December 13).
16. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1994. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Final Rule. 59 Federal Register 7716, February 16.
17. Zyren, John, Charles Dale, and Charles Riner. 1996. 1995 Reformulated Gasoline Market Affected Refiners Differently. Petroleum Marketing Monthly. DOE/EIA-0380(96/01). Washington, D.C.: U.S. GPO.