Chk2 prevents mitotic exit when the majority of kinetochores are unattached

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 205, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 339-356

  Petsalaki, Eleni ^a   Zachos, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CYCLIN B; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; MPS1 PROTEIN; NOCODAZOLE; PROTEIN KINASE; SERINE; TYROSINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; DNA DAMAGE; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; HCT116 CELL LINE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STABILITY;

ANAPHASE; ANIMALS; AURORA KINASE B; BIRDS; CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HCT116 CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MAD2 PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; NOCODAZOLE; PHOSPHORYLATION; POINT MUTATION; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RNA INTERFERENCE; SERINE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSFECTION; TUBULIN MODULATORS; TYROSINE;

EID: 84900418713     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201310071     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abrieu, A., L. Magnaghi-Jaulin, J.A. Kahana, M. Peter, A. Castro, S. Vigneron, T. Lorca, D.W. Cleveland, and J.C. Labbé. 2001. Mps1 is a kinetochoreassociated kinase essential for the vertebrate mitotic checkpoint. Cell. 106:83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00410-X
2. Ahn, J., and C. Prives. 2002. Checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) monomers or dimers phosphorylate Cdc25C after DNA damage regardless of threonine 68 phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 277:48418-48426. http://dx.doi .org/10.1074/jbc.M208321200
3. Ahn, J.Y., X. Li, H.L. Davis, and C.E. Canman. 2002. Phosphorylation of threonine 68 promotes oligomerization and autophosphorylation of the Chk2 protein kinase via the forkhead-associated domain. J. Biol. Chem. 277:19389-19395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M200822200
4. Brito, D.A., and C.L. Rieder. 2006. Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 16:1194-1200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.04 .043
5. Chen, Y., and R.Y. Poon. 2008. The multiple checkpoint functions of CHK1 and CHK2 in maintenance of genome stability. Front. Biosci. 13:5016-5029.
6. Chow, J.P., R.Y. Poon, and H.T. Ma. 2011. Inhibitory phosphorylation of cyclindependent kinase 1 as a compensatory mechanism for mitosis exit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31:1478-1491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00891-10
7. Cimini, D. 2008. Merotelic kinetochore orientation, aneuploidy, and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1786:32-40.
8. Ditchfield, C., V.L. Johnson, A. Tighe, R. Ellston, C. Haworth, T. Johnson, A. Mortlock, N. Keen, and S.S. Taylor. 2003. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161:267-280. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.200208091
9. Fletcher, L., Y. Cheng, and R.J. Muschel. 2002. Abolishment of the Tyr-15 inhibitory phosphorylation site on cdc2 reduces the radiation-induced G(2) delay, revealing a potential checkpoint in early mitosis. Cancer Res. 62:241-250.
10. Foley, E.A., and T.M. Kapoor. 2013. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14:25-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3494
11. Gavet, O., and J. Pines. 2010. Progressive activation of CyclinB1-Cdk1 coordinates entry to mitosis. Dev. Cell. 18:533-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.devcel.2010.02.013
12. Giunta, S., R. Belotserkovskaya, and S.P. Jackson. 2010. DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 190:197-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200911156
13. Hewitt, L., A. Tighe, S. Santaguida, A.M. White, C.D. Jones, A. Musacchio, S. Green, and S.S. Taylor. 2010. Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J. Cell Biol. 190:25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201002133
14. Jelluma, N., A.B. Brenkman, N.J. van den Broek, C.W. Cruijsen, M.H. van Osch, S.M. Lens, R.H. Medema, and G.J. Kops. 2008. Mps1 phosphorylates Borealin to control Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment. Cell. 132:233-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.046
15. Kabeche, L., and D.A. Compton. 2012. Checkpoint-independent stabilization of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Mad2 in human cells. Curr. Biol. 22:638-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.030
16. Kapoor, T.M., T.U. Mayer, M.L. Coughlin, and T.J. Mitchison. 2000. Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5. J. Cell Biol. 150:975-988. http://dx.doi .org/10.1083/jcb.150.5.975
17. Lampson, M.A., and T.M. Kapoor. 2005. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:93-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1208
18. Lee, C.H., and J.H. Chung. 2001. The hCds1 (Chk2)-FHA domain is essential for a chain of phosphorylation events on hCds1 that is induced by ionizing radiation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:30537-30541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc .M104414200
19. Leng, M., D.W. Chan, H. Luo, C. Zhu, J. Qin, and Y. Wang. 2006. MPS1-dependent mitotic BLM phosphorylation is important for chromosome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:11485-11490. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0601828103
20. Maciejowski, J., K.A. George, M.E. Terret, C. Zhang, K.M. Shokat, and P.V. Jallepalli. 2010. Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 190:89-100. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.201001050
21. Magidson, V., C.B. O'Connell, J. Loncarek, R. Paul, A. Mogilner, and A. Khodjakov. 2011. The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell. 146:555-567. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.012
22. Malureanu, L., K.B. Jeganathan, F. Jin, D.J. Baker, J.H. van Ree, O. Gullon, Z. Chen, J.R. Henley, and J.M. van Deursen. 2010. Cdc20 hypomorphic mice fail to counteract de novo synthesis of cyclin B1 in mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 191:313-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201003090
23. Matson, D.R., P.B. Demirel, P.T. Stukenberg, and D.J. Burke. 2012. A conserved role for COMA/CENP-H/I/N kinetochore proteins in the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 26:542-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.184184 .111
24. McGowan, C.H., and P. Russell. 1993. Human Wee1 kinase inhibits cell division by phosphorylating p34cdc2 exclusively on Tyr15. EMBO J. 12:75-85.
25. Minshull, J., A. Straight, A.D. Rudner, A.F. Dernburg, A. Belmont, and A.W. Murray. 1996. Protein phosphatase 2A regulates MPF activity and sister chromatid cohesion in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 6:1609-1620. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70784-7
26. Mueller, P.R., T.R. Coleman, and W.G. Dunphy. 1995a. Cell cycle regulation of a Xenopus Wee1-like kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:119-134. http://dx.doi .org/10.1091/mbc.6.1.119
27. Mueller, P.R., T.R. Coleman, A. Kumagai, and W.G. Dunphy. 1995b. Myt1: a membrane-associated inhibitory kinase that phosphorylates Cdc2 on both threonine-14 and tyrosine-15. Science. 270:86-90. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1126/science.270.5233.86
28. Nezi, L., and A. Musacchio. 2009. Sister chromatid tension and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21:785-795. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.007
29. Peters, J.M. 2002. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell. 9:931-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00540-3
30. Petsalaki, E., and G. Zachos. 2013. Chk1 and Mps1 jointly regulate correction of merotelic kinetochore attachments. J. Cell Sci. 126:1235-1246. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.119677
31. Petsalaki, E., T. Akoumianaki, E.J. Black, D.A. Gillespie, and G. Zachos. 2011. Phosphorylation at serine 331 is required for Aurora B activation. J. Cell Biol. 195:449-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201104023
32. Posch, M., G.A. Khoudoli, S. Swift, E.M. King, J.G. Deluca, and J.R. Swedlow. 2010. Sds22 regulates aurora B activity and microtubule-kinetochore interactions at mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 191:61-74. http://dx.doi .org/10.1083/jcb.200912046
33. Rainey, M.D., E.J. Black, G. Zachos, and D.A. Gillespie. 2008. Chk2 is required for optimal mitotic delay in response to irradiation-induced DNA damage incurred in G2 phase. Oncogene. 27:896-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ sj.onc.1210702
34. Santaguida, S., A. Tighe, A.M. D'Alise, S.S. Taylor, and A. Musacchio. 2010. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190:73-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201001036
35. Santaguida, S., C. Vernieri, F. Villa, A. Ciliberto, and A. Musacchio. 2011. Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction. EMBO J. 30:1508-1519. http://dx.doi .org/10.1038/emboj.2011.70
36. Saurin, A.T., M.S. van der Waal, R.H. Medema, S.M. Lens, and G.J. Kops. 2011. Aurora B potentiates Mps1 activation to ensure rapid checkpoint establishment at the onset of mitosis. Nat. Commun. 2:316. http://dx.doi .org/10.1038/ncomms1319
37. Schwarz, J.K., C.M. Lovly, and H. Piwnica-Worms. 2003. Regulation of the Chk2 protein kinase by oligomerization-mediated cis-and trans-phosphorylation. Mol. Cancer Res. 1:598-609.
38. Srivastava, V., P. Modi, V. Tripathi, R. Mudgal, S. De, and S. Sengupta. 2009. BLM helicase stimulates the ATPase and chromatin-remodeling activities of RAD54. J. Cell Sci. 122:3093-3103. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1242/jcs.051813
39. Stolz, A., N. Ertych, A. Kienitz, C. Vogel, V. Schneider, B. Fritz, R. Jacob, G. Dittmar, W. Weichert, I. Petersen, and H. Bastians. 2010. The CHK2-BRCA1 tumour suppressor pathway ensures chromosomal stability in human somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:492-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2051
40. Tang, Z., T.R. Coleman, and W.G. Dunphy. 1993. Two distinct mechanisms for negative regulation of the Wee1 protein kinase. EMBO J. 12: 3427-3436.
41. Taylor, S.S., D. Hussein, Y. Wang, S. Elderkin, and C.J. Morrow. 2001. Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 114:4385-4395.
42. Tsvetkov, L., X. Xu, J. Li, and D.F. Stern. 2003. Polo-like kinase 1 and Chk2 interact and co-localize to centrosomes and the midbody. J. Biol. Chem. 278:8468-8475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M211202200
43. van der Waal, M.S., R.C. Hengeveld, A. van der Horst, and S.M. Lens. 2012. Cell division control by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex. Exp. Cell Res. 318:1407-1420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.015
44. van Vugt, M.A., A.K. Gardino, R. Linding, G.J. Ostheimer, H.C. Reinhardt, S.E. Ong, C.S. Tan, H. Miao, S.M. Keezer, J. Li, et al. 2010. A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000287
45. Yeh, Y.H., Y.F. Huang, T.Y. Lin, and S.Y. Shieh. 2009. The cell cycle checkpoint kinase CHK2 mediates DNA damage-induced stabilization of TTK/hMps1. Oncogene. 28:1366-1378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ onc.2008.477
46. Zachos, G., E.J. Black, M. Walker, M.T. Scott, P. Vagnarelli, W.C. Earnshaw, and D.A. Gillespie. 2007. Chk1 is required for spindle checkpoint function. Dev. Cell. 12:247-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.003