Geologically-inspired constraints for a potential field litho-inversion scheme

GIS and Spatial Analysis - 2005 Annual Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, IAMG 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 181-186

  Lane, R ^a   Guillen, A ^b  

^a GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b Intrepid Geophysics   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; GEOLOGY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SAMPLING;

3D GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; BAYESIAN APPROACHES; MAGNETIC POTENTIALS; PARAMETER SPACES; POSTERIOR PROBABILITY; POTENTIAL FIELD DATUM; SECONDARY VARIABLES; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION;

LITHOGRAPHY;

EID: 84900411471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Al-Chalabi, M., 1971. Interpretation of gravity anomalies by non-linear optimization. Geophysical Prospecting 20, 1-20.
2. Bosch, M., 1999. Lithologic tomography: from plural geophysical data to lithology estimation. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 749-766.
3. Bosch, M., Guillen, A., Ledru, P., 2001. Lithologic tomography: An application to geophysical data from the Cadomian belt of northern Brittany, France. Tectonophysics 331, 197-228.
4. Bosch, M., McGaughey, J., 2001. Joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data under lithologic constraints. The Leading Edge 20, 877-881.
5. Boschetti, F., Horowitz, F.G., Hornby, P., 1999. Ambiguity analysis and the constrained inversion of potential field data. Australian Geodynamics Cooperative Research Centre Report.
6. Carle, S.F., Fogg, G.E., 1997. Modeling spatial variability with one- And multi-dimensional continuous Markov chains. Mathematical Geology 29, 891-918.
7. Chiles, J.P., Aug, C., Guillen, A., Lees, T., 2004. Modelling the Geometry of Geological Units and its Uncertainty in 3D From Structural Data: The Potential-Field Method. Proceedings of "Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning", Perth, WA, 22 - 24 November 2004, AusIMM, 313-320.
8. Farrell, S., 2000. Gamin; a new approach to the inversion of geological and potential-field data. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, Monash University.
9. Fullagar, P.K., Pears, G., Hutton, D., Thompson, A., 2004. 3D gravity and aeromagnetic inversion for MVT lead-zinc exploration at Pillara, Western Australia. Exploration Geophysics 35, 142-146.
10. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Rubin, D.B., 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 668 pp.
11. Guillen, A., Courrioux, G., Calcagno, P., Lane, R., Lees, T., McInerney, P., 2004. Constrained gravity 3D litho-inversion applied to Broken Hill. Extended Abstract, ASEG 17th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, August 2004, Sydney.
12. Jessell, M.W., 2001. Three-dimensional geological modelling of potential-field data. Computers and Geosciences 27, 455-465.
13. Jessell, M.W., Valenta, R.K., 1996. Structural geophysics: integrated structural and geophysical modelling. In D.G. DePaor (ed), Structural Geology and Personal Computers, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 303-324.
14. Lajaunie, C., Courrioux, G., Manuel, L., 1997. Foliation fields and 3D cartography in geology: principles of a method based on potential interpolation. Mathematical Geology 29, 571-584.
15. Leaman, D., 1994. Criteria for evaluation of potential field interpretations. First Break 12, 181-191.
16. Li, Y., Oldenburg, D.W., 1996. 3-D inversion of magnetic data. Geophysics 61, 394-408.
17. Li, Y., Oldenburg, D.W., 1998a. 3-D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics 63, 109-119.
18. Li, Y., and Oldenburg, D.W., 1998b. Separation of regional and residual magnetic field data. Geophysics 63, 431-439.
19. Perrin, M., Zhu, B., Rainaud, J-F., Schneider, S., 2005. Knowledge-driven applications for geological modeling. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 47, 89-104.
20. Pratt, D.A., McKenzie, K.B., White, A.S., Foss, C.A., Shamin, A., Shi, Z., 2001. A user guided expert system approach to 3D interpretation of magnetic anomalies. Extended Abstract, ASEG Conference, Brisbane, 2001.
21. Roach, M.J., Leaman, D.E., Richardson, R.G., 1993. A comparison of regional-residual separation techniques for gravity surveys. Exploration Geophysics 24, 779-784.
22. Williams, N.C., Lane, R., Lyons, P., 2004. Towards 3D maps of alteration under cover: Regional constrained 3D inversion of potential field data from the Olympic Cu-Au province, South Australia. Extended Abstract, ASEG 17th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, August 2004, Sydney.