Open government success factors in government Websites: The Mexican experience

E-Government Success Factors and Measures: Theories, Concepts, and Methodologies

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 235-250

  Sandoval Almazán, Rodrigo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900390804     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4058-0.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Ayllon, A. L. (2005). Medir la transparencia un imperativo. Política Digital.
2. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011). Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 137-147. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2010.06.010.
3. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Crowd-sourcing transparency: ICTs, social media, and government transparency initiatives. Paper presented at the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities. Puebla, Mexico.
4. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001.
5. Chapman, R. A., & Hunt, M. H. (2006). Open government in a theoretical and practical context. London: Ashgate.
6. Dawes, S. S., & Helbig, N. (2010). Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_5.
7. Evangelidis, A., Akomode, J., Taleb-Bendiab, A., & Taylor, M. (2002). Risk assessment & success factors for e-government in a UK establishment. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-46138- 8_64.
8. Gil-Garcia, J., & Pardo, T. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187-216. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2005.02.001.
9. Gordon, V. (2010). National security directive declassification. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 322-328. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.02.007.
10. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2010). Transparency of public decision-making: Towards trust in local government? Policy & Internet, 2(1). doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1024.
11. Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 365-387. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.002.
12. Hazell, R., & Worthy, B. (2010). Assessing the performance of freedom of information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 352-359. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.005.
13. Helbig, N. (2010). Thinking beyond performance indicators: A holistic study of organizational information use. (Phd Dissertation). University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY.
14. Henry, H. P. Jr. (1997). Open government. Government Information Quarterly, 14(4), 397-406. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(97)90035-6.
15. Hussein, R., Karim, N. S. A., Mohamed, N., & Ahlan, A. R. (2007). The influence of organizational factors information systems success in egovernment agencies in Malaysia. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 29(1), 1-17.
16. Jeremy, R. T. L. (1995). Reinventing (open) government: State and federal trends. Government Information Quarterly, 12(4), 427-455. doi:10.1016/0740-624X(95)90078-0.
17. Kavanaugh, A., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Whalen, T., et al. (2011). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Paper presented at the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. College Park, MD.
18. Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency and participation in practice. New York: O'Reilly.
19. Liu, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhou, C. (2006). Exploring success factors for web-based e-government services: Behavioral Perspective from end users. Learning, 937-942. doi: 10.1109/ictta.2006.1684500
20. Lopez Ayllon, S. (2005). Medir la transparencia: Un imperativo. Politica Digital, 26, 24-30.
21. López-Ayllon, S., Zavala, D., Cázares, A. R., Cejudo, G., & Arellano, D. (2010). Metrica de la transparencia. Mexico City: CIDE.
22. Luna-Reyes, D. E., Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2011). Government web portals performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis. New York: ACM.
23. Martin, M., Kaltenbock, M., Nagy, H., & Auer, S. R. (2011). The open government data stakeholder survey. Retrieved from http://okcon. org/2011/programme/the-open-government-datastakeholder- survey
24. McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401-413. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002.
25. Mishra, A. (2011). Exploring the different dimensions of challenges, implementation, and success factors. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 42(4), 23-37. doi:10.1145/2096140.2096143.
26. Morris, R. A., Sales, B. D., & Berman, J. J. (1981). Research and the freedom of information act. The American Psychologist, 36(8), 819-826. doi:10.1037/h0078384 PMID:7294489.
27. Nam, T. (2011). New ends, new means, but old attitudes: Citizens' views on open government and government 2.0. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2011). Kauai, HI.
28. Office, G. M. G. L. A. (2006). Introduction to open government information work by the Guangzhou municipal government. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 11-17. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2006.02.006.
29. Pardo, T. A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Burke, G. B. (2008). Governance structures in cross-boundary information sharing: Lessons from state and local criminal justice initiatives. IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services. doi:10.1109/ HICSS.2008.185.
30. Parycek, P., & Sachs, M. (2010). Open government: Information flow in web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice, 9. Retrieved from http:// www.epractice.eu/en/document/313345
31. Petrik, K. (2009). Participation and e-democracy how to utilize web 2.0 for policy decision-making. Paper presented at the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government. New York, NY.
32. Ramos-Priego, M. A., & Prieto-Santos, M. A. D. J. (2005). Tecnologías de información y la nueva gestión pública: Portales de gobierno estatales para promover la transparnecia. Puebla: Licenciatura en Administración de Empresas Research, Universidad de las Americas.
33. Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2009). Midiendo la transparencia en internet: Ranking de las páginas web de los institutos de transparencia en Mexico. In Herrera, C., Lizama, G., & Morales, L. (Eds.), Federalismo Y transparencia en Mexico: seis estudios de Caso (Vol. 1, pp. 219-247). Ciudad
34. de Mexico Alianza Civica-Comunidad Europea. Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2010). Ranking de portales de transparencia: La medición 2010. Política Digital, 30-37.
35. Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2011). The two door perspective: An assessment framework for open government. Journal of Democracy, 3(2), 29-45.
36. Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Are e-government portals becoming central components for public information sharing networks? An initial exploration of local governments in Mexico. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S72-S81-S72-S81.
37. Shin, S., Song, H., & Kang, M. (2008, August). Implementing e-government in developing countries: Its unique and common success factors. Federal Computer Week, 1-27.
38. Siegfried, T., Grabow, B., & Drüke, H. (2003). Ten factors for success for local community egovernment. Berlin: Springer.
39. Song, C. (2010). Validating IS success factors: An empirical study on webbased state or local e-government systems. Paper presented at the AMCIS. AMCIS.
40. Till, J. E. (2003). Success factors for open access. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(1), e1-e1. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.1.e1 PMID:12746206.
41. UNPAN. (2012). United Nations e-government development database: Global reports - Global egovernment development report 2010. New York: United Nations Division of Public Economics and Public Administration and the American Society for Public Administration.
42. White House. (2009). Memorandum on transparency and open government. Washington, DC: White House. Retrieved from http://edocket.access. gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1777.pdf
43. Wigand, F. D. L. (2010). Twitter in government: Building relationships one tweet at a time. Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 2010 Seventh International Conference on (pp. 563-567). Las Vegas, NV: ITNG.
44. Zhigang, Q. (2006). Exploration and practice in promoting Shanghai municipal open government information. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 28-35. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.02.005.
45. Schedler, A. (2005). Que es la rendición de cuentas? Mexico City, Mexico: instituto Federal de Acceso a la información. Retrieved from http:// www.transparencianaucalpan.gob.mx/transparencia/ cuadernillos/sintesis3.pdf
46. Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., & Flinn, A. (2010). Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 337-345. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.02.008.