Outcome of intrauterine pregnancies with intrauterine device in place and effects of device location on prognosis

Contraception

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 426-430

  Ozgu Erdinc, A Seval ^a   Tasdemir, Ufuk Goker ^b   Uygur, Dilek ^a   Aktulay, Ayla ^a   Tasdemir, Nicel ^c   Gulerman, H Cavidan ^a  

^a Diseases Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b Hayrabolu State Hospital   (Turkey)

^c NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adverse pregnancy outcome; Intrauterine device; Location; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CHORIOAMNIONITIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FETUS DEATH; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PREMATURE LABOR; PROGNOSIS; RETAINED INSTRUMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; VAGINA BLEEDING; YOUNG ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900324215     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. W.D. Mosher, and J. Jones Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008 Vital Health Stat 2010 2010 1 44
2. B.Y.E. Akadli Ergocmen, and F.H. Tunckanat Family Planning of HUI, (HUIPS). PS Turkey demographic and health survey 2008 2009 Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health, T.R. Prime Ministry State Planning Organization Ankara,Turkey 75 93
3. Organization WH Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use Research DoRHa 2004 World Health Organization Geneva
4. F.F. de Araujo, M. Barbieri, C.A. Guazzelli, and P.C. Lindsey The T 380A intrauterine device: a retrospective 5-year evaluation Contraception 78 2008 474 478
5. R. Rivera, I.C. Chi, and G. Farr The intrauterine device in the present and future Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 5 1993 829 832
6. J. Trussell Contraceptive failure in the United States Contraception 83 2011 397 404
7. P. Thonneau, T. Almont, E. de La Rochebrochard, and B. Maria Risk factors for IUD failure: results of a large multicentre case-control study Hum Reprod 21 2006 2612 2616
8. P. Thonneau, H. Goulard, and N. Goyaux Risk factors for intrauterine device failure: a review Contraception 64 2001 33 37
9. P.F. Thonneau, and T. Almont Contraceptive efficacy of intrauterine devices Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 2008 248 253
10. F.E. Skjeldestad, R. Hammervold, and D.R. Peterson Outcomes of pregnancy with an IUD in situ - a population based case-control study Adv Contracept 4 1988 265 270
11. L.C. Horn, P. Nenoff, M. Ziegert, and M. Hockel Missed abortion complicated by Candida infection in a woman with rested IUD Arch Gynecol Obstet 264 2001 215 217
12. H. Ganer, A. Levy, I. Ohel, and E. Sheiner Pregnancy outcome in women with an intrauterine contraceptive device Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 2009 381 e1 - 5
13. W. Chaim, and M. Mazor Pregnancy with an intrauterine device in situ and preterm delivery Arch Gynecol Obstet 252 1992 21 24
14. S.K. Kim, R. Romero, and J.P. Kusanovic et al. The prognosis of pregnancy conceived despite the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD) J Perinat Med 38 2010 45 53
15. H.J. Tatum, F.H. Schmidt, and A.K. Jain Management and outcome of pregnancies associated with the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device Am J Obstet Gynecol 126 1976 869 879
16. P. von Theobald, J.M. Duchemin, and G. Levy [The outcome of continuing pregnancies in patients with intrauterine devices. A retrospective study from the Maternity Unit of the University Hospital Center at Caen during the period 1985-1988] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 19 1990 863 868
17. J. Mermet, C. Bolcato, R.C. Rudigoz, and D. Dargent Outcome of pregnancies with an intrauterine devices and their management Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 81 1986 233 235
18. M.M. Inal, K. Ertopcu, and I. Ozelmas The evaluation of 318 intrauterine pregnancy cases with an intrauterine device Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 10 2005 266 271
19. R. Deveer, Y. Engin-Ustun, E. Sarikaya, P. Aydogan, M. Doganay, and L. Mollamahmutoglu Comparison of C-reactive protein levels in pregnancies with retained and removed intrauterine device J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24 2011 1152 1154
20. D. Brahmi, M.W. Steenland, R.M. Renner, M.E. Gaffield, and K.M. Curtis Pregnancy outcomes with an IUD in situ: a systematic review Contraception 85 2012 131 139
21. C. Owen, S. Sober, and C.A. Schreiber Controversies in family planning: desired pregnancy, IUD in situ and no strings visible Contraception 88 2013 330 333
22. E. Moschos, and D.M. Twickler Intrauterine devices in early pregnancy: findings on ultrasound and clinical outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 204 2011 427 e1-6
23. E. Fulcheri, E. di Capua, and N. Ragni Pregnancy despite IUD: adverse effects on pregnancy evolution and fetus Contraception 68 2003 35 38