|
Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 165-167
|
Comparison of two automated immunoassays for the determination of Puumalavirus IgM and IgG
|
Author keywords
ELISA; Hantaviruses; Nephropathia epidemica; Puumalavirus; Sensitivity; Specificity
|
Indexed keywords
IMMUNOGLOBULIN G;
IMMUNOGLOBULIN M;
VIRUS ANTIBODY;
ARTICLE;
CROSS REACTION;
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS;
ELISA KIT;
ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY;
EPSTEIN BARR VIRUS;
FALSE POSITIVE RESULT;
HANTAVIRUS RAPID TEST;
HUMAN;
IMMUNOBLOTTING;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
KAPPA STATISTICS;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUUMALA VIRUS;
PUUMALA VIRUS INFECTION;
SELECTION BIAS;
SERODIAGNOSIS;
VIRUS DETECTION;
VIRUS INFECTION;
BLOOD;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
EVALUATION STUDY;
HEMORRHAGIC FEVER WITH RENAL SYNDROME;
IMMUNOLOGY;
LABORATORY AUTOMATION;
PROCEDURES;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ANTIBODIES, VIRAL;
AUTOMATION, LABORATORY;
DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE;
ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY;
HEMORRHAGIC FEVER WITH RENAL SYNDROME;
HUMANS;
IMMUNOGLOBULIN G;
IMMUNOGLOBULIN M;
PUUMALA VIRUS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 84900318610
PISSN: 13866532
EISSN: 18735967
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.03.009 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (7)
|