Stochastic dynamic models for foreclosed housing acquisition and redevelopment

61st Annual IIE Conference and Expo Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Bayram, Armagan ^a   Solak, Senay ^a   Johnson, Michael ^b   Turcotte, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic programming; Foreclosure; Portfolio management; Resource allocation; Stochastic programming

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; EXHIBITIONS; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; INVESTMENTS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING;

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS; DOMINANCE RELATIONSHIPS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING MODEL; FORECLOSURE; MULTI-STAGE STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING; PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENTS; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING MODEL;

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

EID: 84900304892     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. J. Wright, C. ReVelle., and J. Cohon. A multiobjective integer programming model for the land acquisition problem. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13(-):31-53, 1983.
2. J.P. Caulkins, G. Feichtinger, D. Grass, M.P. Johnson, G. Tragler, and Y. Yegorov. Placing the poor while keeping the rich in their place: Separating strategies for optimally managing residential mobility and assimilation. Demographic Research, 13(1):1-34, 2005.
3. M.P. Johnson. Single-period location models for subsidized housing: Tenant-based subsidies. Annals of Operations Research, 123(-):105-124, 2003.
4. M.P. Johnson. Spatial decision support for assisted housing mobility counseling. Decision Support Systems, 41(1):296-312, 2005.
5. M.P. Johnson. Single-period location models for subsidized housing: Project-based subsidies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40(4):249-274, 2006.
6. M.P. Johnson, D. Turcotte, and F.M. Sullivan. What foreclosed homes should a municipality purchase to stabilize vulnerable neighborhoods? Networks and Spatial Economics, 10(-):363-388, 2010.
7. P. Mild and A. Salo. Combining a multiattribute value function with an optimization model: An application to dynamic resource allocation for infrastructure maintenance. Decision Analysis, 6(3):139-152, 2009.
8. C.H. Loch and S. Kavadias. Dynamic protfolio selection of npd programs using marginal returns. Management Science, 48(10):1227-1241, 2002.
9. S. Solak, J.B. Clarke, E.L. Johnson, and E.R. Barnes. Optimization of r&d project portfolios under endogenous uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1):420-433, 2010.