Analysing the diffusion and adoption of mobile IT across social worlds

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 87-103

  Nielsen, Jeppe Agger ^a   Mengiste, Shegaw Anagaw ^b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Diffusion and adoption; healthcare service innovation and information technology; mobile health; pervasive technologies; social world

Indexed keywords

AGED; DENMARK; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MASS COMMUNICATION; MICROCOMPUTER; MOBILE PHONE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK;

AGED; CELL PHONES; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; DENMARK; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84900295928     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458213481688     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Kietzmann J. Interactive innovation of technology for mobile work. Eur J Inform Syst. 2008 ; 17 (3). 305-320
2. Trimi S, Sheng H. Emerging trends in m-government. Comm ACM. 2008 ; 51 (5). 53-58
3. Hameed K. The application of mobile computing and technology to health care services. Telemat Inform. 2003 ; 20: 99-106
4. Scheepers R, Scheepers H, Ngwenyama OK. Contextual influences on user satisfaction with mobile computing: findings from two healthcare organizations. Eur J Inform Syst. 2006 ; 15: 261-268
5. Lu YC, Xiao Y, Sears A, et al. A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2005 ; 74: 409-422
6. Rothschild JM, et al. Use and perceived benefits of handheld computer-based clinical references. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 ; 13 (6). 619-626
7. Zhang H, Cocosila M, Archer NA. Factors of adoption of mobile information technology by homecare nurses: a technology acceptance model 2 approach. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 ; 28 (1). 49-56
8. Chau S, Turner P. Utilisation of mobile handheld devices for care management at an Australian aged care facility. Electron Commer R A. 2006 ; 5: 305-312
9. Vimarlund V, Olve NG. Economic analyses for ICT in elderly healthcare - questions and challenges. Health Informat J. 2005 ; 11 (4). 293-305
10. Anderson M, Lindgren R, Henfridsson O. Architectural knowledge in inter-organizational IT innovation. J Strategic Inf Syst. 2008 ; 9: 19-38
11. Van de Ven AH. Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies. MIS Quart. 2005 ; 29 (2). 368-378
12. Gaikwad R, Warren J. The role of home-based information and communications technology interventions in chronic disease management: a systematic literature review. Health Informat J. 2009 ; 15 (2). 122-146
13. Youngjin Y, Lyytinen K, Yang H, et al. The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: the case of South Korea. J Strategic Inf Syst. 2005 ; 14: 323-353
14. Yi MY, et al. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals. Inform Manage. 2006 ; 43 (3). 350-363
15. Park Y, Chens JV. Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2007 ; 107 (9). 1349-1365
16. Wu JH, Wang SC, Lin LM. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the health care industry: a structural equation model. Int J Med Inform. 2007 ; 76 (1). 66-77
17. Hong HS, et al. Adoption of a PDA-based home hospice care system for cancer patients. Comput Inform Nurs. 2009 ; 27 (6). 365-371
18. Vishwanath A, Brodsky L, Shaha S. Physician adoption of personal digital assistants (PDA): testing its determinants within a structural equation model. J Health Commun. 2009 ; 14 (1). 77-95
19. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 1989 ; 13 (3). 319-340
20. Rogers E Diffusion of innovations. 5 th ed.New York: The Free Press, 2003. New York: The Free Press ; 2003 :
21. Lyytinen K, Damsgaard J. What is wrong with the diffusion of innovation theory: the case of complex and networked technology. Paper presented at IFIP 8.6 ; Banff, AB, Canada ;..
22. Bijker WE Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ; 1995 :
23. Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci. 1992 ; 3 (3). 398-427
24. Bolland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: the case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ Sci. 2007 ; 18 (4). 631-647
25. Strauss A Studies in symbolic interaction. Denzin N, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press ; 1978: 119-128.
26. Strauss A. Scientists and the evolution of policy arenas: the case of AIDS. Paper presented at the stone symposium of the society for the study of symbolic interaction ; San Francisco, CA ;..
27. Clarke A, Star SL The handbook of science and technology studies. Hackett E Amsterdamska O Lynch M, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press ; 2008: 113-139.
28. Maines DR. In search of mesostructure studies in the negotiated order. J Contemp Ethnogr. 1982 ; II: 267-279
29. GarretyKBadhamR. The politics of sociotechnical intervention: an interactionist view, http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/156
30. Strauss AL Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter ; 1993 :
31. Orlikowski W. Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci. 2000 ; 11 (4). 404-428
32. George J, King JL. Examining the computing and centralization debate. Comm ACM. 1991 ; 34 (7). 63-72
33. Gieryn T Handbook of science and technology studies. Jasanoff S Markle G Petersen J, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ; 1995: 393-443.
34. Clarke A Social organization and socials process: essays in honour of Anselm Strauss. Maines D, ed. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter ; 1991: 119-158.
35. Star SS, Griesemer JR. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-1939. Soc Stud Sci. 1989 ; 19: 387-420
36. GalU.YooY.BolandR.J. (2004). The Dynamics of Boundary Objects, Social Infrastructures and Social Identities, Case Western Reserve University, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 4(11). http://sprouts.aisnet. org/4-11
37. Fujimura JH Science as practice and culture. Pickering A, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press ; 1992: 168-211.
38. Roth WM, McGinn MK. Inscriptions: toward a theory of representing as social practice. Rev Educ Res. 1998 ; 68 (1). 35-59
39. Bechk BA. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ Sci. 2003 ; 14 (3). 312-330
40. Carlile PR. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ Sci. 2002 ; 13: 442-455
41. Bødker S. Understanding representation in design. Hum Comput Interact. 1998 ; 13 (2). 107-125
42. Briers M, Chua WF. The role of actor networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Account Org Soc. 2001 ; 26: 237-269
43. Pawlowski SD, Robey D. Bridging user organizations: knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. 2004 ; 28 (4). 645-672
44. Bowker GC, Timmermans S, Star SL Information technology and changes in organizational work. Orlikowiski W Walsham G Jones MR, ed. London: Chapman & Hall ; 1995: 344-369.
45. Nelson RR, Winter SG. In search of a useful theory of innovation. Res Policy. 1997 ; 6: 36-76
46. Vimarlund V, et al. Organizational effects of information and communication technology (ICT) in elderly homecare: a case study. Health Informat J. 2008 ; 14 (3). 183-193
47. RauchD. Institutional fragmentation and social service variations: a Scandinavian comparison. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Sweden, 2005.
48. Doyle M, Timonen V Home care for ageing populations: a comparative analysis of domiciliary care in Denmark, the United States and Germany. MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing ; 2007 :
49. Nilsson M Work in home care. An ethnomethodological study of computer-supported collaboration. Denmark: RUC ; 2008 :
50. Miles MB, Huberman AM Handbook of qualitative research. Denzin NK Lincoln YS, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ; 1994: 428-444.
51. Patton MQ Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ; 2002 :
52. Mobil government - more time for service. Copenhagen: ; 2002 :
53. An introduction to mobile IT in home care. Copenhagen: ; 2005 :
54. IT strategy for the social sector 2005-2008. Copenhagen: ; 2006 :
55. Rostgaard T, Szebehely M. Changing policies, changing patterns of care: Danish and Swedish home care at the crossroads. Eur J Ageing. 2012 ; 9 (2). 101-109
56. Lützhöft R Elderly sector. Need for comprehensive IT solutions. Copenhagen: Local Government Denmark ; 1994 :
57. Documentation project in the elderly sector. Copenhagen: ; 2007 :
58. EU 4th quality conference. Description of work with quality in home care.. :
59. Denmark: ; 1999 :
60. Denmark: ; 2006 :
61. Currie WL. Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory. Inform Tech People. 2009 ; 22 (1). 63-77
62. Mumford E, Weir M London: Associated Business Press ; 1979 :
63. Franz CR, Robey D. Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sci. 1986 ; 17: 329-356
64. Yin RK Case study research: design and methods. 4 th ed.London: SAGE, 2009. London: SAGE ; 2009 :
65. Guide to funds for better and more flexible home care services. Copenhagen: ; 2006 :