EQ-5D Portuguese population norms

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 425-430

  Ferreira, Lara Noronha ^a,c   Ferreira, Pedro L ^b,c   Pereira, Luis N ^a   Oppe, Mark ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^d ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Health surveys; Health related quality of life; Population norms; QALYs

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PORTUGAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFERENCE VALUE; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PORTUGAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900267741     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0488-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dolan, P. (1997). Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35, 1095-1108.
2. Wittrup-Jensen, K.; Lauridsen, J.; Gudex, C.; Pedersen, K. (2009). Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37(5), 459-466. doi: 10.1177/1403494809105287.
3. Greiner, W.; Claes, C.; Busschbach, J.; Schulenburg, J.-M. (2005). Validating the EQ-5D with time trade-off for the German population. The European Journal of Health Economics, 6, 124-130.
4. Chevalier, J.; Pouvourville, G. (2012). Valuing EQ-5D using time trade-off in France. The European Journal Health Economics, 14(1), 57-66. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0351-x.
5. Lamers, L.; McDonnell, J.; Stalmeier, P.; Krabbe, P.; Busschbach, J. (2006). The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics, 15(10), 1121-1132.
6. Viney, R.; Norman, R.; King, M. T.; Cronin, P.; Street, D. J.; Knox, S.; et al. (2011). Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. Value in Health, 14(6), 928-936.
7. Bansback, N.; Tsuchiya, A.; Brazier, J.; Anis, A. (2012). Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: Preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies. PLoS One, 7(2), e31115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0031115.
8. Tsuchiya, A.; Ikeda, S.; Ikegami, N.; Nishimura, S.; Sakai, I.; Fukuda, T.; et al. (2002). Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: The case of Japan. Health Economics, 11(4), 341-353.
9. Shaw, J.; Johnson, J.; Coons, S. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 model. Medical Care, 43, 203-220.
10. Greiner, W.; Weijnen, T.; Nieuwenhuizen, M.; Oppe, S.; Badia, X.; Busschbach, J.; et al. (2003). A single European currency for EQ-5D health states: Results from a six-country study. The European Journal of Health Economics, 4, 222-231.
11. Ferreira, L. N.; Ferreira, P. L.; Pereira, L. N.; Oppe, M. (2013). The valuation of the EQ-5D in Portugal. Quality of Life Research. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0448-z.
12. Hawthorne, G.; Osborne, R. (2005). Population norms and meaningful differences for the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) measure. Australian New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 29(2), 136-142.
13. Hopman, W.; Towheed, T.; Anasassiades, T.; Tenenhouse, A.; Poliquin, S.; Berger, C.; et al. (2000). Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168(3), 265-271.
14. Szende, A.; Williams, A. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Hungary: SpringMed Publishing.
15. Sun, S.; Chen, J.; Johannesson, M.; Kind, P.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; et al. (2011). Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Quality of Life Research, 20(3), 309-320.
16. Sørensen, J.; Davidsen, M.; Gudex, C.; Pedersen, K.; Brønnum-Hansen, H. (2009). Danish EQ-5D population norms. Scandinavian Journal Public Health, 37(5), 467-474.
17. Luo, N.; Johnson, J.; Shaw, J.; Feeny, D.; Coons, S. (2005). Self-reported health status of the general adult US population as assessed by the EQ-5D and health utilities index. Medical Care, 43(11), 1078-1086.
18. Rao, J. (2003). Small area estimation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19. Portuguese Statistical Office. (2012). Census 2011 Resultados Definitivos - Portugal. Lisbon: INE.
20. Wiseman, F.; Billington, M. (1984). Comment on a standard definition of response rate. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 336-338.
21. Kind, P.; Dolan, P.; Gudex, C.; Williams, A. (1998). Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 16, 736-741.
22. Burström, K.; Johannesson, M.; Diderichsen, F. (2001). Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 10, 621-635.
23. König, H. H.; Bernert, S.; Angermeyer, M. C.; Mattschinger, H.; Martinez, M.; Vilagut, G.; et al. (2009). Comparison of population health status in six European countries. Medical Care, 47(2), 255-261.
24. Snyder, C.; Aaronson, N.; Choucair, A.; Elliott, T.; Greenhalgh, J.; Halyard, M.; et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305-1314. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x.