Responsibility for information assurance and privacy: A problem of individual ethics?

Advanced Topics in End User Computing

Volumn 4, Issue , 2005, Pages 186-207

  Stahl, Bernd Carsten ^a  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900078964     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-474-3.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Anderson, R.E., Johnson, D.G., Gotterbarn, D., & Perrolle, J. (1993). Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making. Communications of the ACM, 36(2), 98-106.
2. Bayertz, K. (Ed.) (1995). Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
3. Bechtel, W. (1985, October). Attributing responsibility to computer systems. Metaphilosophy, 16(4), 296-305.
4. Beu, D., & Buckley, M.R. (2001). The hypothesized relationship between accountability and ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 57-73.
5. Bierhoff, H.W. (1995). Verantwortungsbereitschaft, Verantwortungsabwehr und Verantwortungszuschreibung-Sozialpsychologische Perspektiven. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? (pp. 217-240). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
6. Birnbacher, D. (1995). Grenzen der Verantwortung. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? (pp. 143-183). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
7. Boncella, R.J. (2001). Internet privacy-At home and at work. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 7, 1-28.
8. Bowie, N.E. (1999). Business ethics-A Kantian perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Britz, J.J. (1999). Ethical guidelines for meeting the challenges of the information age. In L.J. Pourciau (Ed.), Ethics and electronic information in the 21st century (pp. 9-28). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
10. Brown, W.S. (2000). Ontological security, existential anxiety and workplace privacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 61-65.
11. Camp, L.J. (2001). Web security and privacy: An American perspective. In R.A. Spinello, & H.T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp. 474-486). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
12. Culnan, M.J. (1993). How did they get my name? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 341-363.
13. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T.W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Eisenberg, T. et al. (1995). The computer worm: A report to the provost of Cornell University on an investigation conducted by the Commission of Preliminary Enquiry. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 60-89). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Elgesiem, D. (1996). Privacy, respect for persons, and risk. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 45-66). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16. Etchegoyen, A. (1993). Le temps des responsables. Paris: Editions Julliard.
17. European Union (2000). Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union (2000/C 364/01). Europarl. Retrieved January 13, 2004, from http://www.europarl.eu.int/charter/default_en.htm
18. Fischer, J.M. (1999). Recent work on moral responsibility. Ethics, 110(1), 93-139.
19. Forester, T., & Morrison, P. (1994). Computer ethics-Cautionary tales and ethical dilemmas in computing. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
20. Frankfurt, H.C. (1997). Partis contraires et responsabilité morale. In M. Neuberg (Ed.), La responsabilité-Questions philosophiques (pp. 55-64). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
21. Frankfurt, H.G. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, LXVI, 828-839.
22. French, P.A. (1992). Responsibility matters. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
23. Gavison, R. (1995). Privacy and limits of law. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 332-351). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Goldman, A.I. (1999). Why citizens should vote: A causal responsibility approach. In E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller, & J. Paul (Eds.), Responsibility (pp. 201-217). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
25. Grabner-Kräuter, S. (2002). The role of consumers' trust in online-shopping. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 43-50.
26. Hart, H.L.A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility-Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27. Hartman, L. (2001). Technology and ethics: Privacy in the workplace. Business and Society Review, 106(1), 1-27.
28. Healy, M., & Iles, J. (2002). The impact of information and communications technology on managerial practices: The use of codes of conduct. In I. Alvarez et al. (Eds.), The transformation of organisations in the information age: Social and ethical implications. Proceedings of the Sixth ETHICOMP Conference, November 13-15, 2002, Lisbon, Portugal.
29. Himanen, P. (2001). The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. London: Secker & Warburg.
30. Höffe, O. (1995). Moral als Preis der Moderne: Ein Versuch über Wissenschaft, technik und umwelt. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
31. Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM, 42(4), 80-87.
32. Hubig, C. (1995a). Verantwortung und Hochtechnologie. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? (pp. 98-139). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
33. Hubig, C. (1995b). Technik- und Wissenschaftsethik. Berlin/Heidelberg, NY: Springer Verlag.
34. Hunter, L. (1995). Public image. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 293-299). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. IASE (2003). Information assurance support environment. IASE. Retrieved April 8, 2003, from http://iase.disa.mil/
36. Introna, L. (2000). Privacy and the computer-Why we need privacy in the information society. In R.M. Baird, R. Ramsower, & S.E. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Cyberethics- Social and moral issues in the computer age (pp. 188-199). New York: Prometheus Books.
37. Johnson, D.G. (2001). Computer ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38. Jonas, H. (1984). Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
39. Kant, I. (1995). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft/Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
40. Kaufmann, F.-X. (1992). Der Ruf nach Verantwortung. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
41. Khare, R., & Rifkin, A. (1998). Trust management on the World Wide Web. First Monday, 3(6). Retrieved February 21, 2005 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_6/khare/index.html
42. Koehn, D. (2001). Ethical challenges confronting businesses today. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Ethics, Business and Society, Barcelona, Spain.
43. Langford, D. (1999). Business computer ethics. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
44. Lenk, H. (1998). Konkrete Humanität: Vorlesungen über Verantwortung und Menschlichkeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.
45. Lenk, H., & Maring, M. (1990). Verantwortung und soziale Fallen. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, 1, 49.
46. Levy, S. (1995). Battle of the clipper chip. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 651-664). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47. Littlewood, B., & Stringy, L. (1995). The risks of software. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 432-437). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48. Mason, R.O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10, 5-12.
49. May, L., & Hoffman, S. (Eds.). Collective responsibility: Five decades of debate in theoretical and applied ethics. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
50. Milberg, S., Burke, S., Smith, H.J., & Kallman, E. (1995). Values, personal information, privacy, and regulatory approaches. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 65-74.
51. Moor, J.H. (2000). Toward a theory of privacy in the information age. In R.M. Baird, R. Ramsower, & S.E. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Cyberethics-Social and moral issues in the computer age (pp. 200-212). New York: Prometheus Books.
52. Neuberg, M. (Ed.) (1997). La responsabilité-Questions philosophiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
53. NIAP (2003). About NIAP. Retrieved April 7, 2003, from http://niap.nist.gov/
54. Nida-Rümelin, J. (1998). Über den Respekt vor der Eigenverantwortung des Anderen. In B. Neubauer (Ed.), Eigenverantwortung: Positionen und Perspektiven. Waake, Germany: Licet Verlag.
55. Nikander, P. & Karvonen, K. (2000). Users and trust in cyberspace. Cambridge Security Protocol Workshop 2000, Cambridge, UK.
56. Paul, E.F., Miller, F.D., & Paul, J. (Eds.) (1999). Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
57. Posner, R.A. (1995). An economic theory of privacy. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 358-366). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58. Rachels, J. (1995). Why privacy is important. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 351-357). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59. Robison, W.L. (2000). Privacy and appropriation of identity. In G. Collste (Ed.), Ethics in the age of information technology (pp. 70-86). Linköping, Sweden: Centre for Applied Ethics.
60. Rogerson, S. (1998). Ethical aspects of information technology-Issues for senior executives. London: Institute of Business Ethics.
61. Rotenberg, M. (1995). Computer virus legislation. In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 135-147). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
62. Rotenberg, M. (1998). Communications privacy: Implications for network design. In R.N. Stichler, & R. Hauptman (Eds.), Ethics, information and technology: Readings (pp. 152-168). Jefferson, NC: MacFarland & Company.
63. Rötzer, F. (1998). Eigenverantwortung in komplexen Systemen und als komplexes System. In B. Neubauer (Ed.), Eigenverantwortung: Positionen und Perspektiven. Waake, Germany: Licet Verlag.
64. Rutter, J. (2001). From the sociology of trust towards a sociology of "e-trust." International Journal of New Product Development & Innovation Management, 2(4), 371-385.
65. Sänger, M. (Ed.). Arbeitstexte für den Unterricht: Verantwortung. Stuttgart, Germany: Philipp Reclam jun.
66. Schulman, M. (2000). Littlebrother is watching you. In R.M. Baird, R. Ramsower, & S.E. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Cyberethics-Social and moral issues in the computer age (pp. 155-161). New York: Prometheus Books.
67. Severson, R.J. (1997). The principles of information ethics. Armonk, NY/London: M.E. Sharpe.
68. Sipior, J.C., & Ward, B.T. (1995). The ethical and legal quandary of email privacy. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 48-54.
69. Spafford, E.H. (1995). Are computer hacker break-ins ethical? In D.G. Johnson, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Computers, ethics & social values (pp. 125-134). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70. Spinello, R. (1997). Case studies in information and computer ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
71. Staddon, J. (1999). On responsibility in science and law. In E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller, & J. Paul (Eds.), Responsibility (pp. 146-174). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
72. Stahl, B.C. (2004). Responsible management of information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
73. Stocker, M. (1999). Responsibility and the abuse excuse. In E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller, & J. Paul (Eds.), Responsibility (pp. 175-200). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
74. Straub, D.W., & Collins, R.W. (1990). Key information liability issues facing managers: Software piracy, proprietary databases, and individual rights to privacy. MIS Quarterly, 14.
75. Tavani, H. (2000). Privacy and security. In D. Langford (Ed.), Internet ethics (pp. 65-89). London: McMillan.
76. Tavani, H.T., & Moor, J.T. (2001). Privacy protection, control of information, and privacy-enhancing technologies. In R.A. Spinello, & H.T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp. 378-391). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
77. van den Hoven, M.J. (1999). Privacy or informational injustice? In L.J. Pourciau (Ed.), Ethics and electronic information in the 21st century (pp. 139-150). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
78. van der Ploeg, I. (2001). Written on the body: Biometrics and identity. In R.A. Spinello, & H.T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp. 501-514). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
79. Velasquez, M. (1998). Business ethics: Concepts and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
80. Wallace, R.J. (1996). Responsibility and the moral sentiment. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
81. Warren, S.D., & Brandeis, L.D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 5, 193-220.
82. Weckert, J., & Adeney, D. (1997). Computer and information ethics. Westport, CT/London: Greenwood Press.
83. Werhane, P. (1985). Persons, rights, and corporations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
84. Wunenburger, J.-J. (1993). Questions d'éthique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, PUF.
85. Zimmerli, W.C. (1987). Wandelt sich die Verantwortung mit dem technischen Wandel? In H. Lenk, & G. Ropohl (Eds.), Technik und Ethik (pp. 92-111). Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun.