Erratum: Women Can Keep the Vote: No Evidence That Hormonal Changes During the Menstrual Cycle Impact Political and Religious Beliefs [Psychological Science, (2014), 25, (1147–1149), DOI: 10.1177/0956797613520236];Women Can Keep the Vote: No Evidence That Hormonal Changes During the Menstrual Cycle Impact Political and Religious Beliefs

Psychological Science

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1147-1149

  Harris, Christine R ^a   Mickes, Laura ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMAN; OVULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; OVULATION; POLITICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; WOMEN;

EID: 84900030362     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797614550327     Document Type: Erratum

References (7)

1. Durante K. M.,Rae A.,Griskevicius V.The fluctuating female vote: Politics, religion, and the ovulatory cycle.Psychological Science. 2013;24:1007-1016.
2. Harris C. R.Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered.Sex Roles. 2011;64:669-681.
3. Harris C. R.,Chabot A.,Mickes L.Shifts in methodology and theory in menstrual cycle research on attraction.Sex Roles. 2013;69:525-535.
4. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Pashler H.Wagenmakers E.-J., ed. 2012:528-654.
5. Penton-Voak I. S.,Perrett D. I.,Castles D. L.,Kobayashi T.,Burt D. M.,Murray L. K.,Minamisawa R.Menstrual cycle alters face preference.Nature. 1999;399:741-742.
6. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
7. Wood W.,Kressel L.,Joshi P.,Louie B.Women's mate preferences: A meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects.Emotion Review. in press;:.