How does robotic anti-reflux surgery compare with traditional open and laparoscopic techniques: A cost and outcomes analysis

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1686-1690

  Owen, Benjamin ^a   Simorov, Anton ^a   Siref, Andy ^a   Shostrom, Valerie ^b   Oleynikov, Dmitry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Digestive; GORD GERD; Oesophageal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTIREFLUX OPERATION; ARTICLE; COST; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HEALTH CARE COST; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FUNDOPLICATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900011353     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3372-y     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, Markiewicz S, Lombard R (1991) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:138-143
2. Eshraghi N, Farahmand M, Soot SJ, Rand-Luby L, Deveney CW, Sheppard BC (1998) Comparison of outcomes of open versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication performed in a single practice. Am J Surg 175:371-374 (Pubitemid 28213447)
3. Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, Neary P, DeMeester TR, Perdikis G (1994) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 220:472-481
4. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic vs conventional Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 11:441-444 (Pubitemid 127523829)
5. Landreneau RJ, Wichmann RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Santucci TS, Boley TM, Magee MJ, Naunheim KS (1998) Success of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Thorac Surg 66:1886-1983
6. Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Crookes P, Oberg S, de Vos Shoop M, Hagan JA, Bremner CG (1998) The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: prospective evaluation of 100 patients with "typical" symptoms. Ann Surg 228:40-50 (Pubitemid 30190314)
7. Watson DI, Jamieson GG (1999) Antireflux surgery in the laparoscopic era. Br J Surg 85:1173-1184
8. Niebisch S, Fleming FJ, Galey KM, Wilshire CL, Jones CE, Litle VR, Watson TJ, Peters JH (2012) Perioperative risk of laparoscopic fundoplication: safer than previously reported. Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2009. J Am Coll Surg 215(1):61-68
9. Jun M, Yingxin K, Xiao C, Wang B, Wang Z (2010) Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1803-1814
10. Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, Bintintan VV, Koninger J, Buchler MW, Gutt CN (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 21:1800-1805 (Pubitemid 47404117)
11. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa M, Fayad C, Varela E, Wilson SE (2007) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers. J Am Coll Surg 205:248-255 (Pubitemid 47095420)
12. Hinojosa MW, Murrell ZA, Konyalian VR, Mills S, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2007) Comparison of laparoscopic vs. warning open sigmoid colectomy for benign and malignant disease at academic medical centers. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1423-1429 (discussion 1429-1430)
13. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36(1):8-27 (Pubitemid 128456396)
14. Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16:1389-1402
15. Shaligram A, Unnirevi J, Simorov A, Kothari VM, Oleynikov D (2012) How does the robot affect outcomes? A retrospective review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 26:1047-1050