The role of spatial information in the preservation of the shrimp nursery function of mangroves: A spatially explicit bio-economic model for the assessment of land use trade-offs

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 143, Issue , 2014, Pages 17-25

  Zavalloni, Matteo ^a   Groeneveld, Rolf A ^b   van Zwieten, Paul A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aquaculture; Ecosystem service; Mangrove; Production possibilities frontier; Shrimp nursery habitat; Spatial information

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE PRODUCTION; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LAND USE CHANGE; MANGROVE; NUMERICAL MODEL; NURSERY GROUND; PRESERVATION; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SHRIMP CULTURE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADE-OFF; WILD POPULATION;

AQUACULTURE; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; LAND USE; MANGROVE; MODEL; NONHUMAN; SHRIMP; SPECIES HABITAT; ANIMAL; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM; FOREST; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PROCEDURES; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; VIET NAM;

CA MAU; VIET NAM;

ANIMALS; AQUACULTURE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); ECOSYSTEM; FORESTS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; VIETNAM;

EID: 84900000267     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aburto-Oropeza O., Ezcurra E., Danemann G., Valdez V.c., Murray J., Sala E. Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:10456-10459.
2. Anh P.T., Kroeze C., Bush S.R., Mol A.P.J. Water pollution by intensive brackish shrimp farming in south-east Vietnam: causes and options for control. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97:872-882.
3. Barbier E.B. Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ. Policy 2007, 22:177-229.
4. Barbier E.B. Aspatial model of coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 78:70-79.
5. Barbier E.B., Cox M. An economic analysis of shrimp farm expansion and mangrove conversion in Thailand. Land Econ. 2004, 80:389-407.
6. Barbier E.B., Hacker S.D., Kennedy C., Koch E.W., Stier A.C., Silliman B.R. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 2010, 81:169-193.
7. Barbier E.B., Koch E.W., Silliman B.R., Hacker S.D., Wolanski E., Primavera J., Granek E.F., Polasky S., Aswani S., Cramer L.A., Stoms D.M., Kennedy C.J., Bael D., Kappel C.V., Perillo G.M.E., Reed D.J. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 2008, 319:321-323.
8. Bekele E.G., Lant C.L., Soman S., Misgna G. The evolution and empirical estimation of ecological-economic production possibilities frontiers. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 90:1-9.
9. Binh C.T., Phillips M.J., Demaine H. Integrated shrimp-mangrove farming systems in the Mekong delta of Vietnam. Aquac. Res. 1997, 28:599-610.
10. Blaber S.J.M. Fishes and fisheries in tropical estuaries: the last 10 years. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 135:57-65.
11. Brander L.M., Wagtendonk A.J., Hussain S.S., McVittie A., Verburg P.H., de Groot R.S., van der Ploeg S. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: a meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:62-69.
12. Browder J.A., May L.N., Rosenthal A., Gosselink J.G., Baumann R.H. Modeling future trends in wetland loss and brown shrimp production in Louisiana using thematic mapper imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 1989, 28:45-59.
13. Cong R.-G., Smith H.G., Olsson O., Brady M. Managing ecosystem services for agriculture: will landscape-scale management pay?. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 99:53-62.
14. Costello C., Rassweiler A., Siegel D., De Leo G., Micheli F., Rosenberg A. The value of spatial information in MPA network design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:18294-18299.
15. de Graaf G.J., Xuan T.T. Extensive shrimp farming, mangrove clearance and marine fisheries in the southern provinces of Vietnam. Mangroves Salt Marshes 1998, 2:159-166.
16. DeFries R., Pagiola S., Adamowicz W.L., Akcakaya H.R., Arcenas A., Babu S., Balk D., Confalonieri U., Cramer W., Falconí F., Fritz S., Green R., Gutiérrez-espeleta E., Hamilton K., Kane R., Latham J., Matthews E., Ricketts T., Yue T.X., Ash N., Thonell J. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Analytical Approaches for Assessing Ecosystems and Human Well-being 2009, vol. 1.
17. Duke N.C., Meynecke J.-O., Dittmann S., Ellison A.M., Anger K., Berger U., Cannicci S., Diele K., Ewel K.C., Field C.D., Koedam N., Lee S.Y., Marchand C., Nordhaus I., Dahdouh-Guebas F. Aworld without mangroves?. Science 2007, 317:41-42.
18. Ellison A.M. Managing mangroves with benthic biodiversity in mind: moving beyond roving banditry. J.Sea Res. 2008, 59:2-15.
19. Fry B. Open bays as nurseries for Louisiana brown shrimp. Estuaries Coasts 2008, 31:776-789.
20. Gedan K., Kirwan M., Wolanski E., Barbier E., Silliman B. The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Clim. Change 2011, 106:7-29.
21. Giap D.H., Yi Y., Yakupitiyage A. GIS for land evaluation for shrimp farming in Haiphong of Vietnam. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2005, 48:51-63.
22. Ha T.T.P., van Dijk H., Visser L. Impacts of changes in mangrove forest management practices on forest accessibility and livelihood: a case study in mangrove-shrimp farming system in Ca Mau Province, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Land Use Policy 2014, 36:89-101.
23. Haas H.L., Rose K.A., Fry B., Minello T.J., Rozas L.P. Brown shrimp on the edge: linking habitat to survival using an individual-based simulation model. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:1232-1247.
24. Igulu M., Nagelkerken I., van der Beek M., Schippers M., van Eck R., Mgaya Y. Orientation from open water to settlement habitats by coral reef fish: behavioral flexibility in the use of multiple reliable cues. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 493:243-257.
25. Kautsky N., Berg H., Folke C., Larsson J., Troell M. Ecological footprint for assessment of resource use and development limitations in shrimp and tilapia aquaculture. Aquac. Res. 1997, 28:753-766.
26. Kimirei I.A., Nagelkerken I., Mgaya Y.D., Huijbers C.M. The mangrove Nursery paradigm revisited: otolith stable isotopes support nursery-to-Reef movements by Indo-Pacific fishes. Plos One 2013, 8:e66320.
27. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:468-479.
28. Lichtenstein M.E., Montgomery C.A. Biodiversity and timber in the coast Range of Oregon: inside the production possibility frontier. Land Econ. 2003, 79:56-73.
29. Loneragan N.R., Ahmad Adnan N., Connolly R.M., Manson F.J. Prawn landings and their relationship with the extent of mangroves and shallow waters in western peninsular Malaysia. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2005, 63:187-200.
30. Lugendo B.R., Nagelkerken I., Kruitwagen G., van der Velde G., Mgaya Y.D. Relative importance of mangroves as feeding habitats for fishes: a comparison between mangrove habitats with different settings. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2007, 80:497-512.
31. Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155:1-12.
32. Manson F.J., Loneragan N.R., Harch B.D., Skilleter G.A., Williams L. Abroad-scale analysis of links between coastal fisheries production and mangrove extent: a case-study for northeastern Australia. Fish. Res. 2005, 74:69-85.
33. McNally C.G., Uchida E., Gold A.J. The effect of a protected area on the tradeoffs between short-run and long-run benefits from mangrove ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108:13945-13950.
34. Meynecke J.-O., Lee S.Y., Duke N.C., Warnken J. Relationships between estuarine habitats and coastal fisheries in Queensland, Australia. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2007, 80:773-793.
35. Mönkkönen M., Juutinen A., Mazziotta A., Miettinen K., Podkopaev D., Reunanen P., Salminen H., Tikkanen O.-P. Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. J.Environ. Manag. 2014, 134:80-89.
36. Mumby P.J., Edwards A.J., Arias-González J.E., Lindeman K.C., Blackwell P.G., Gall A., Gorczynska M.I., Harborne A.R., Pescod C.L., Renken H. Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nature 2004, 427:533-536.
37. Shrimp Price Study, Phase II; Case studies in Vietnam, Indonesia and Bangladesh 2010, 111. NACA, Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific, Available online at. http://www.enaca.org/modules/library/publication.php?publication_id=1002.
38. Nagelkerken I. Evaluation of Nursery Function of Mangroves and Seagrass beds for Tropical Decapods and Reef Fishes: Patterns and Underlying Mechanisms, Ecological Connectivity Among Tropical Coastal Ecosystems 2009, 357-399. Springer.
39. Nalle D.J., Montgomery C.A., Arthur J.L., Polasky S., Schumaker N.H. Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber. J.Environ. Econ. Manag. 2004, 48:997-1017.
40. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D., Chan K.M., Daily G.C., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Lonsdorf E., Naidoo R., Ricketts T.H., Shaw M. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:4-11.
41. Parks P.J., Bonifaz M. Nonsustainable use of renewable resources: mangrove deforestation and mariculture in Ecuador. Mar. Resour. Econ. 1994, 9.
42. Pauly D. Amethod to estimate the stock-recruitment relationship of shrimps. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1982, 111:13-20.
43. Phung T.H.T. Resilience and Livelihood Dynamics of Shrimp Farmers and Fishers in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam 2012, Wageningen School of Social Science. Wageningen University, Wageningen.
44. Phuong T.N. A(conceptual) Model for Evaluating Accessibility of Shrimp Species to Mangrove Forest Using Remote Sensing and GIS, Case Study in Ngoc Hien District, Ca Mau Province, Viet Nam 2009, 45. Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing. Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen.
45. Polasky S., Nelson E., Camm J., Csuti B., Fackler P., Lonsdorf E., Montgomery C., White D., Arthur J., Garber-Yonts B., Haight R., Kagan J., Starfield A., Tobalske C. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:1505-1524.
46. Polasky S., Solow A. The value of information in reserve site selection. Biodivers. Conserv. 2001, 10:1051-1058.
47. Polidoro B.A., Carpenter K.E., Collins L., Duke N.C., Ellison A.M., Ellison J.C., Farnsworth E.J., Fernando E.S., Kathiresan K., Koedam N.E. The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. Plos One 2010, 5:e10095.
48. Primavera J.H. Development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: institutional issues. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 35:91-106.
49. Primavera J.H. Overcoming the impacts of aquaculture on the coastal zone. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2006, 49:531-545.
50. Rönnbäck P. The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 29:235-252.
51. Rönnbäck P., Macia A., Almqvist G., Schultz L., Troell M. Do Penaeid shrimps have a preference for mangrove habitats? Distribution pattern analysis on Inhaca island, Mozambique. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2002, 55:427-436.
52. Rönnbäck P., Troell M., Kautsky N., Primavera J.H. Distribution pattern of shrimps and fish among Avicennia and Rhizophora microhabitats in the Pagbilao Mangroves, Philippines. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1999, 48:223-234.
53. Roth B., KA R., LP R., TJ M. Relative influence of habitat fragmentation and inundation on brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus production in northern Gulf of Mexico salt marshes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 359:185-202.
54. Runting R.K., Wilson K.A., Rhodes J.R. Does more mean less? the value of information for conservation planning under sea level rise. Glob. Change Biol. 2013, 19:352-363.
55. Sanchirico J., Springborn M. How to get there from here: ecological and economic dynamics of ecosystem service provision. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 48:243-267.
56. Sathirathai S., Barbier E.B. Valuing mangrove conservation in southern thailand. Contemp. Econ. Policy 2001, 19:109-122.
57. Siikamäki J., Sanchirico J.N., Jardine S.L. Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109:14369-14374.
58. Valiela I., Bowen J.L., York J.K. Mangrove forests: one of the world's threatened major tropical environments. Bioscience 2001, 51:807-815.
59. Vance D.J., Haywood M.D.E., Heales D.S., Kenyon R.A., Loneragan N.R., Pendrey R.C. How far do prawns and fish move into mangroves? Distributionof juvenile banana prawns Penaeus merguiensis and fish inatropical mangrove forest in northern Australia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1996, 131:115-124.
60. Walters B.B., Rönnbäck P., Kovacs J.M., Crona B., Hussain S.A., Badola R., Primavera J.H., Barbier E., Dahdouh-Guebas F. Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89:220-236.
61. Walters C., Korman J. Linking recruitment to trophic factors: revisiting the Beverton-Holt recruitment model from a life history and multispecies perspective. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 1999, 9:187-202.
62. Walters C.J., Martell S.J.D. Fisheries Ecology and Management 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
63. Wang Y., Die D. Stock-recruitment relationships of the tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus and Penaeus semisulcatus) in the Australian northern prawn fishery. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1996, 47:87-95.
64. Wickramasinghe S., Borin M., Kotagama S.W., Cochard R., Anceno A.J., Shipin O.V. Multi-functional pollution mitigation in a rehabilitated mangrove conservation area. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35:898-907.
65. Williams J., ReVelle C., Levin S. Spatial attributes and reserve design models: a review. Environ. Model. Assess. 2005, 10:163-181.