Comparison of open and robotic-assisted prostatectomy: The University of British Columbia experience

Canadian Urological Association Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 92-97

  Gagnon, Louis Olivier ^a   Goldenberg, S Larry ^a   Lynch, Kenny ^a   Hurtado, Antonio ^a   Gleave, Martin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899976482     PISSN: 19116470     EISSN: 19201214     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1707     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Statistics Canada, Health Statistics Division, Vital Statistics. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-624-x/2011001/article/11596-eng.htm. Accessed March 18, 2014.
2. Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al. AUA Prostate Cancer Clinical Guideline Update Panel. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 2007;177:2106-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.003.
3. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol 2012;187:2087-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.061.
4. Descazeaud A, Peyromaure M, Zerbib M. Will robotic surgery become the gold standard for radical prostatectomy? Eur Urol 2007;51:9-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.007.
5. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 2011;59:61-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.039.
6. Walsh P, Schaeffer EM, Partin AW, et al. Radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy. In A. Wein. Campbell-Walsh Urology (10th edition). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2011.
7. Menon M, Hemal AK, VIP Team. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: A technique of robotic radical prostatectomy: Experience in more than 1000 cases. J Endourol 2004;18:611-9; discussion 619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2004.18.611.
8. Nelson AL, Cohen JT, Greenberg D, et al. Much cheaper, almost as good: Decrementally cost-effective medical innovation. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:662-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00011.
9. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302:1557-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1451.
10. Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008;54:785-93. Epub 2008 Jun 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.063.
11. Kang DC, Hardee MJ, Fesperman SF, et al. Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results of a systematic review of the published literature. Eur Urol 2010;57:930-7. Epub 2010 Jan 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.01.034.
12. Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010;24:2003-15. Epub 2010 Oct 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0295.
13. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: Results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012;61:679-85. Epub 2011 Dec 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027.
14. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, et al. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:1-15. Epub 2012 Feb 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029.
15. Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010;8:162-200.
16. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part I: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Actas Urol Esp 2011;35:501-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2011.12.003.
17. Ahmed K, Ibrahim A, Wang TT, et al. Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - A systematic review. BJU Int 2012;110:1544-56. Epub 2012 Mar 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11015.x.
18. Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: The differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. J Urol 2013;189:1289-94. Epub 2012 Oct 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.028.