Dynamic Social Networks in Recovery Homes

American Journal of Community Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 324-334

  Jason, Leonard A ^a   Light, John M ^b   Stevens, Edward B ^a   Beers, Kimberly ^a  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic social networks; Oxford Houses; Recovery homes; Substance use disorders

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; EVALUATION STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HALFWAY HOUSE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRUST;

ALCOHOLISM; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HALFWAY HOUSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TRUST;

EID: 84899969213     PISSN: 00910562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10464-013-9610-6     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
2. Bickel, W. K., & Vuchinich, R. E. (Eds.). (2000). Reframing health behavior change with behavior economics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
4. Bogat, G. A., Zarrett, N., Peck, S. C., & von Eye, A. (2012). The person-oriented approach and community research. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Methodological approaches to community-based research (pp. 89-110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Bonaventura, M., Ames, K., Brumpton, R., Garratt, R., Hall, K., & Wilson, N. (2006). Human friendship favours cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Behaviour, 143, 1383-1395.
6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Butts, C. T. (2010). sna: Tools for social network analysis. R package version 2. 2-0. Retrieved from http://CRAN. R-project. org/package=sna.
8. Carley, K. M., & Krackhardt, D. (1996). Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Social Networks, 18, 1-27. doi: 10. 1016/0378-8733(95)00252-9.
9. Cruz, J. E., Emery, R. E., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Peer network drinking predicts increased alcohol use from adolescence to early adulthood after controlling for genetic and shared environmental selection. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1390-1402.
10. Davey, M. A., Latkin, C. A., Hua, W., Tobin, K. E., & Strathdee, S. (2007). Individual and social network factors that predict entry to drug treatment. American Journal on Addictions, 16(1), 38-45. doi: 10. 1080/10601330601080057.
11. DiClemente, C. C., Fairhurst, S., & Piotrowski, N. (1995). The role of self-efficacy in the addictive behaviors. In J. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaption and adjustment: Theory, research and application (pp. 109-141). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
12. Hlebec, V., & Ferligoj, A. (2002). Reliability of social network measurement instruments. Field Methods, 14(3), 288-306.
13. Horst, M., & Coffé, H. (2012). How friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107, 509-529.
14. Humphreys, K., Kaskutas, L. A., & Weisner, C. (1998). The Alcoholics Anonymous Affiliation Scale: Development, reliability, and norms for diverse treated and untreated populations. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 22, 974-978. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1530-0277. 1998. tb03691. x.
15. Humphreys, K., Mankowski, E. S., Moos, R. H., & Finney, J. W. (1999). Do enhanced friendship networks and active coping mediate the effect of self-help groups on substance abuse? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 54-60. doi: 10. 1007/BF02895034.
16. Humphreys, K., & Noke, J. (1997). The influence of post-treatment mutual help group participation on the friendship networks of substance abuse patients. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(1), 1-16.
17. Jason, L. A., Davis, M. I., Ferrari, J. R., & Anderson, E. (2007a). The need for substance abuse after-care: Longitudinal analysis of Oxford House. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 803-818. doi: 10. 1016/j. addbeh. 2006. 06. 014.
18. Jason, L. A., & Glenwick, D. S. (2012). Introduction: An overview of methodological innovations in community research. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Methodological approaches to community-based research (pp. 3-10). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Jason, L. A., Olson, B. D., & Foli, K. (2008). Rescued lives: The Oxford House approach to substance abuse. New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Jason, L. A., Stevens, E., Ferrari, J. R., Thompson, E., & Legler, R. (2012). Social networks among residents in recovery homes. Advances in Psychology Study, 1, 4-12.
21. Kaplan, H. B. (1996). Psychosocial stress from the perspective of self theory. In H. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Psychosocial stress: Perspectives on structure, theory, life-course and methods (pp. 175-244). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Kaskutas, L. A., Bond, J., & Humphreys, K. (2002). Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction, 97, 891-900. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1360-0443. 2002. 00118. x.
23. Kelly, J. G. (2006). Becoming ecological: An expedition into community psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24. Kelly, J. F., Stout, R. L., Magill, M., Tonigan, J. S., & Pagano, M. E. (2010). Mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics Anonymous: Does AA lead to better alcohol use outcomes by reducing depression symptoms? Addiction, 105, 626-636. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1360-0443. 2009. 02820. x.
25. Kelly, J. F., & Urbanoski, K. (2012). Youth recovery contexts: The incremental effects of 12-step attendance and involvement on adolescent outpatient outcomes. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(7), 1219-1229.
26. Longabaugh, R., Wirtz, P. W., Beattie, M. C., Noel, N., & Stout, R. (1995). Matching treatment focus to patient social investment and support: 18-month follow-up results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 296-307. doi: 10. 1037/0022-006X. 63. 2. 296.
27. Magnusson, D. (1987). Individual development from an interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Malloy, J. P. (1988). Oxford house manual 2. Silver Spring, MD: Oxford House Inc.
29. Marsden, P. V. (2011). Survey methods for network data. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 370-388). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Montgomery, H. A., Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Differences among AA groups: Implications for research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 54, 502-504.
31. Moos, R. H. (1994). The Social Climate Scales: A user's guide (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden Inc.
32. Moos, R. H. (2008). Active ingredients of substance use-focused self-help groups. Addiction, 103, 387-396. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1360-0443. 2007. 02111. x.
33. Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (2006). Rates and predictors of relapse after natural and treated remission from alcohol use disorders. Addiction, 101, 212-222. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1360-0443. 2006. 01310. x.
34. Patulny, R. (2011). Social trust, social partner time and television time. Social Indicators Research, 101, 289-293.
35. Polcin, D. L., Korcha, R., Bond, J., Galloway, G., & Lapp, W. (2010). Recovery from addiction in two types of sober living houses: 12-month outcomes. Addiction Research and Theory, 18, 442-455. doi: 10. 3109/16066350903398460.
36. Richman, A., & Neumann, B. (1984). Breaking the 'detox loop' for alcoholics with social detoxification. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 13, 65-73. doi: 10. 1016/0376-8716(84)90033-4.
37. Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., & Preciado, P. (2013). Manual for RSiena. Oxford, UK: Department of Statistics, Nuffield College.
38. Rynes, K. N., & Tonigan, J. S. (2012). Do social networks explain 12-step sponsorship effects? A prospective lagged mediation analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(3), 432-439.
39. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207. doi: 10. 1037/h0062326.
40. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31, 361-395. doi: 10. 1111/0081-1750. 00099.
41. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60. doi: 10. 1016/j. socnet. 2009. 02. 004.
43. Steglich, C., Sinclair, P., Holliday, J., & Moore, L. (2012). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in a stop smoking in schools trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, 34, 359-369.
44. Stevens, E. B., Jason, L. A., & Ferrari, J. R. (2011). Measurement performance of the Sense of Community Index in substance abuse recovery communal housing. Australian Community Psychologist, 23, 135-147.
45. Todd, N. R., Allen, N. E., & Javdani, S. (2012). Multilevel modeling: Method and application for community-based research. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Methodological approaches to community-based research (pp. 167-186). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46. Vaillant, G. E. (1983). The natural history of alcoholism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Vaillant, G. E. (2003). A 60-year follow-up of alcoholic men. Addiction, 98, 1043-1051. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1360-0443. 2003. 00422. x.
48. Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & van Zalk, M. H. W. (2103). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 399-412.
49. Zywiak, W. H., Longabaugh, R., & Wirtz, P. W. (2002). Decomposing the relationships between pretreatment social network characteristics and alcohol treatment outcome. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(1), 114-121.