The coevolutionary implications of host tolerance

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1426-1435

  Best, Alex ^a,b   White, Andy ^c   Boots, Mike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Defense; Gene for gene; Host pathogen; Matching alleles; Tolerance

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENETICS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SYMBIOSIS; VIRULENCE;

ANIMALS; DISEASE RESISTANCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; SYMBIOSIS; VIRULENCE;

EID: 84899948087     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12368     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adelman, J. S., L. Kirkpatrick, J. L. Grodio, and D. M. Hawley . 2013. House finch populations differ in early inflammatory signaling and pathogen tolerance at the peak of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection. Am. Nat. 181:674-689.
2. Agrawal, A., and C. M. Lively . 2002. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-allele models and all points in between. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4:79-90.
3. Antonovics, J., and P. H. Thrall . 1994. The cost of resistance and the maintenance of genetic polymorphism in host-pathogen systems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257:105-110.
4. Ayres, J., and D. Schneider . 2008. A signaling protease required for melanization in Drosophila affects resistance and tolerance of infections. PLoS Biol. 6:2764-2773.
5. Best, A., A. White, and M. Boots . 2008. Maintenance of host variation in tolerance to pathogens and parasites. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:20786-20791.
6. Best, A., A. White, and M. Boots . 2009a. The implications of coevolutionary dynamics to host-parasite interactions. Am. Nat. 173:779-791.
7. Best, A., A. White, and M. Boots . 2009b. Resistance is futile but tolerance can explain why parasites do not always castrate their hosts. Evolution 64:348-357.
8. Best, A., A. White, E. Kisdi, J. Antonovics, M. A. Brockhurst, and M. Boots . 2010. The evolution of host-parasite range. Am. Nat. 176:63-71.
9. Boots, M. 2008. Fight or learn to live with the consequences? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:248-250.
10. Boots, M.. 2011. The evolution of resistance to a parasite is determined by resources. Am. Nat. 178:214-220.
11. Boots, M., and M. Begon . 1993. Trade-offs with resistance to a granulosis virus in the Indian meal moth, examined by a laboratory evolution experiment. Funct. Ecol. 7:528-534.
12. Boots, M., and R. G. Bowers . 1999. Three mechanisms of host resistance to microparasites-avoidance, recovery and tolerance-show different evolutionary dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 201:13-23.
13. Boots, M., and Y. Haraguchi . 1999. The evolution of costly resistance in host-parasite systems. Am. Nat. 153:359-370.
14. Boots, M., A. Best, M. R. Miller, and A. White . 2009. The role of ecological feedbacks in the evolution of host defence: what does theory tell us? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 364:27-36.
15. Boots, M., A. White, A. Best, and R. Bowers . 2012. The importance of who infects whom: the evolution of diversity in host resistance to infectious disease. Ecol. Lett. 15:1104-1111.
16. Bowers, R. G., M. Boots, and M. Begon . 1994. Life-history trade-offs and the evolution of pathogen resistance: competition between host strains. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257:247-253.
17. Burdon, J. J. 1987. Diseases and plant population biology. Pp 39-59 in U. Dieckmann, ed. Adaptive dynamics of pathogen-host interactions. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
18. Carval, D., and R. Ferriere . 2010. A unified model for the coevolution of resistance, tolerance and virulence. Evolution 64:2988-3009.
19. Day, T., and S. Gandon . 2007. Applying population-genetic models in theoretical evolutionary epidemiology. Ecol. Lett. 10:876-888.
20. Dybdahl, M. F., and C. M. Lively . 1996. The geography of coevolution: comparative population structures for a snail and its trematode parasite. Evolution 50:2264-2275.
21. Flor, H. H. 1956. The complementary genic systems in flax and flax rust. Adv. Genet. 8:29-54.
22. Geritz, S. A. H., E. Kisdi, G. Meszéna, and J. A. J. Metz . 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:35-57.
23. Jayakar, S. D. (1970). A mathematical model for interaction of gene frequencies in a parasite and its host. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1:140-164.
24. Little, T. J., D. M. Shuker, N. Colegrave, T. Day, and A. L. Graham . 2010. The coevolution of virulence: tolerance in perspective. PLoS Pathog. 6:1-5.
25. Luijckx, P., H. Fienberg, D. Duneau, and D. Ebert . 2013. A matching-allele model explains host resistance to parasites. Curr. Biol. 23:1085-1088.
26. Medzhitov, R., D. S. Schneider, and M. P. Soares . 2012. Disease tolerance as a defense strategy. Science 335:936-941.
27. Miller, M. R., A. White, and M. Boots . 2005. The evolution of host resistance: tolerance and control as distinct strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 236:198-207.
28. Miller, M. R., A. White, and M. Boots . 2006. The evolution of parasites in response to tolerance in their hosts: the good, the bad and apparent commensalism. Evolution 60:945-956.
29. Read, A. F., A. L. Graham, and L. Raberg . 2008. Animal defenses against infectious agents: is damage control more important than pathogen control? PLoS Biol. 6:2638-2641
30. Restif, O., and J. C. Koella . 2003. Shared control of epidemiological traits in a coevolutionary model of host-parasite interactions. Am. Nat. 161:827-836.
31. Restif, O., and J. C. Koella . 2004. Concurrent evolution of resistance and tolerance to pathogens. Am. Nat. 164:E90-E102.
32. Roy, B. A., and J. W. Kirchner . 2000. Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54:51-63.
33. Råberg, L., D. Sim, and A. F. Read . 2007. Disentangling genetic variation for resistance and tolerance to infectious diseases in animals. Science 318:812-814.
34. Råberg, L., A. L. Graham, and A. F. Read . 2009. Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 364:37-49.
35. Sasaki, A. 2000. Host-parasite coevolution in a multilocus gene-for-gene system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:2183-2188.
36. Simms, E. L., and J. Triplett . 1994. Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48:1973-1985.
37. Stowe, K. A., R. J. Marquis, C. G. Hochwender, and E. L. Simms . 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:565-595.
38. Strogatz, S. 1994. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Westview Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Tellier, A., and J. K. M. Brown . 2007a. Polymorphism in multilocus host-parasite coevolutionary interactions. Genetics 177:1777-1790.
40. Tellier, A., and J. K. M. Brown . 2007b. Stability of genetic polymorphism in host-parasite interactions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274:809-817.
41. Tellier, A., and J. K. M. Brown . 2009. The influence of perenniality and seed banks on polymorphism in plant-parasite interactions. Am. Nat. 174:769-779.
42. Thompson, J. N., and J. J. Burdon . 1992. Gene-for-gene coevolution between plants and parasites. Nature 360:121-125.
43. Tiffin, P., and M. D. Rausher . 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common Morning Glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat. 154:700-716.
44. Van der Linden, L., J. Bredenkamp, S. Naidoo, J. Fouche-Weich, K. J. Denby, S. Genin, Y. Marco, and D. K. Berger . 2013. Gene-for-gene tolerance to bacterial wilt in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26:398-406.