Development of the Addiction Dimensions for Assessment and Personalised Treatment (ADAPT)

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 139, Issue , 2014, Pages 121-131

  Marsden, John ^a,b,c   Eastwood, Brian ^a,c   Ali, Robert ^d   Burkinshaw, Pete ^c   Chohan, Gagandeep ^e   Copello, Alex ^e   Burn, Daniel ^c   Kelleher, Michael ^a,b,c   Mitcheson, Luke ^a,b,c   Taylor, Steve ^c   Wilson, Nick ^f   Whiteley, Chris ^g   Day, Edward ^a,e,h  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTH LONDON AND MAUDSLEY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL MENTAL HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f Blenheim CDP ^*  (United Kingdom)

^g EAST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ADAPT; Assessment; Personalised; Substance use disorder; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION DIMENSIONS FOR ASSESSMENT AND PERSONALISED TREATMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF FUNCTIONING; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPIATE ADDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED KINGDOM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARDS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

ADULT; AMPHETAMINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84899946588     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ali R., Meena S., Eastwood B., Richards I., Marsden J. Ultra-rapid screening for substance-use disorders: the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST-Lite). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 132:352-361.
2. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 2000, American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DC. 4th ed., Text Revision.
3. Asparouhov T., Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 2009, 16:397-438.
4. Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models 1993, 136-162. Sage, Newbury Park. K. Bollen, J. Long (Eds.).
5. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Soc. Methods Res. 2004, 33:261-304.
6. Cicchetti D.V. Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: resolving some basic issues. Br. J. Psychiatry 1976, 129:452-456.
7. Celeux G., Soromenho G. An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. J. Classif. 1996, 13:195-212.
8. Costello A.B., Osborne J.W. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 2005, 10:173-178.
9. Del Boca F., Noll J.A. Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 2000, 95(Suppl. 3):347-360.
10. Dennis M.L., White M.K., Titus J.C., Unsicker J.I. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures (Version 5) 2006, Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL.
11. Enders C.K., Bandalos D.L. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct. Equat. Model. 2001, 8:430-457.
12. Ferguson E., Cox T. Exploratory factor analysis: a users' guide. Int. J. Select. Assess. 1993, 1:84-94.
13. Fleiss J.L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions 1981, John Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
14. Floyd F.J., Widaman K.F. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol. Assess. 1995, 7:286-299.
15. Glaser F.B., Skinner H.A. Matching in the real world. Matching Patient Needs and Treatment Methods in Alcoholism and Drug Abuse 1981, 295-324. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL. E. Gottheil, T.A. McLellan, K.A. Druley (Eds.).
16. Gossop M., Marsden J., Stewart D., Kidd T. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS): 4-5 year follow-up results. Addiction 2003, 98:291-303.
17. Grella C.E., Lovinger K. Thirty-year trajectories of heroin and other drug use among men and women sampled from methadone treatment in California. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011, 118:251-258.
18. Greenberg G.A., Rosenheck R.A. Using the GAF as a national mental health outcome measure in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Psychiatr. Serv. 2005, 56:420-426.
19. Halikas J.A., Kuhna K.L., Crosbya R., Carlsona G., Creaa F. The measurement of craving in cocaine patients using the Minnesota cocaine craving scale. Compr. Psychiatry 1991, 32:22-27.
20. Hser Y.I., Polinsky M.L., Maglione M., Anglin M.D. Matching clients' needs with drug treatment services. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1999, 16:299-305.
21. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 1998, 3:424-453.
22. Humphreys K., Moos R.H. Encouraging post-treatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: two-year clinical and utilization outcomes. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2007, 31:64-68.
23. Jöreskog K.G., Goldberger A.S. Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1975, 70:631-639.
24. Kalman D., Baker Morissette S., George T.P. Co-morbidity of smoking in patients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Am. J. Addict. 2005, 2:106-123.
25. Kleber H.D., Weiss R.D., Anton R.F., Rounsaville B.J., George T.P., Strain E.C., Greenfield S.F., Ziedonis D.M., Kosten T.R., et al. Treatment of patients with substance use disorders, second edition. Am. J. Psychiatry 2006, 163(Suppl. 8):5-82.
26. Kuyken W., Padesky C.A., Dudley R. Collaborative Case Conceptualization 2011, The Guilford Press, New York.
27. Lavori P.W., Dawson R. Adaptive treatment strategies in chronic disease. Ann. Rev. Med. 2008, 59:443-453.
28. Lazarsfeld P.F., Henry N.W. Latent Structure Analysis 1968, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
29. Light R.J. Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol. Bull. 1971, 76:365-377.
30. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1996, 1:130-149.
31. Marsden J., Farrell M., Bradbury C., Dale-Perera A., Eastwood B., Roxburgh M., Taylor S. Development of the treatment outcomes profile. Addiction 2008, 103:1450-1460.
32. Marsden J., Eastwood B., Jones H., Bradbury C., Hickman M., Knight J., Randhawa K., White M. Risk adjustment of heroin treatment outcomes for comparative performance assessment in England. Addiction 2012, 107:2161-2172.
33. McKay J.R. Treating Substance Use Disorders with Adaptive Continuing Care 2009, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
34. McLachlan G., Peel D.A. Finite Mixture Models 2000, Wiley, New York.
35. McLellan A.T., Luborsky L., Woody G.E., O'Brien C.P. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abusers: the Addiction Severity Index. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1980, 168:26-33.
36. McLellan A.T., Woody G.E., Luborsky L., O'Brien C.P., Druley K.A. Increased effectiveness of substance abuse treatment: a prospective study of patient treatment matching. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1983, 171:597-605.
37. McLellan A.T., Grissom G.R., Zanis D., Randall M., Brill P., O'Brien C.P. Problem-service 'matching' in addiction treatment. A prospective study in 4 programs. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1997, 54:730-735.
38. McLellan A.T., Kushner H., Metzger D., Peters R., Smith I., Grissom G., Pettinati H., Argeriou M. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1992, 9:199-213.
39. ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-related Disorders, Second Edition-Revised (ASAM PPC-2R) 2001, ASAM, Chevy Chase. D. Mee-Lee, G.D. Shulman, M. Fishman (Eds.).
40. Mitcheson L., Maslin J., Meynan T., Morrison T., Hill R., Wanigaratne S. Applied cognitive and behavioural approaches to the treatment of addiction: a practical treatment guide 2010, Wiley, West Sussex.
41. Muthén B., Muthén L.K. Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24:882-891.
42. National Institutes for Health and Clinical Excellence Drug Misuse: Psychosocial Interventions. National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 51 2008, (accessed 27.01.14). http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11812/35975/35975.pdf.
43. Nasreddine Z.S., Phillips N.A., Bédirian V., Charbonneau S., Whitehead V., Collin I., Cummings J.L., Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53:695-699.
44. Nylund K.L., Asparouhov T., Muthén B.O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct. Equat. Model. 2007, 14:535-569.
45. Orlando M.E., Reeve B.B. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual. Life Res. Suppl. 2007, 16(1):5-18.
46. Patton J.H., Stanford M.S., Barratt E.S. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J. Clin. Psychol. 1995, 51:768-774.
47. Recovery Orientated Drug Treatment Expert Group Medications in Recovery: Re-Orientating Drug Dependence Treatment 2012, National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse, London.
48. Rigdon E.E. Calculating degrees of freedom for a structural equation model. Struct. Equat. Model. 1994, 1:274-278.
49. Rosas S.R., Camphausen L.C. The use of concept mapping for scale development and validation in evaluation. Eval. Program Plan. 2007, 30:125-135.
50. Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monogr. Suppl. 1969, 34:100-114.
51. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6:461-464.
52. Sclove L.S. Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika 1987, 52:333-343.
53. Wadland W.C., Ferenchick G.S. Medical comorbidity in addictive disorders. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 2004, 27:675-687.
54. White W. Peer-based Addiction Recovery Support: History, Theory, Practice and Scientific Evaluation 2009, Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center and Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health, Chicago, IL.
55. White W., Cloud W. Recovery capital: a primer for addictions professionals. Counselor 2008, 9:22-27.
56. White W.L., Mojer-Torres L. Recovery-oriented Methadone Maintenance 2008, Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center; Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services; Northeast Addiction Technology Transfer Center, (accessed 27.01.14). http://www.atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/Recovery.pdf.
57. World Health Organization ICF CHECKLIST. Version 2.1a. Clinician Form for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2003, (accessed 27.01.14). http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfchecklist.pdf.
58. Wright B.D., Stone M.H. Making Measures 2004, Phaneron Press, Chicago.