Erratum to Earthquake-and-landslide events are associated with more fatalities than earthquakes alone[Nat Hazards, (2014), 72, 895–914, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1044-4];Earthquake-and-landslide events are associated with more fatalities than earthquakes alone

Natural Hazards

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 895-914

  Budimir, M E A ^a   Atkinson, P M ^a   Lewis, H G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cascading hazards; Coseismic; Earthquakes; Landslides; Natural hazards; Risk

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE MECHANISM; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LANDSLIDE; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRIGGER MECHANISM; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84899911281     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: 15730840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1621-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Allen TI, Marano KD, Earle PS, Wald DJ (2009) PAGER-CAT: A composite earthquake catalog for calibrating global fatality models. Seism Res Lett 80(1): 57-62.
2. Buzna L, Peters K, Helbing D (2006) Modelling the dynamics of disaster spreading in network. Physica A 363(1): 132-140.
3. Buzna L, Peters K, Ammoser H, and Helbing D (2007) Efficient response to cascading disaster spreading. Phys Rev E 75: 1-7.
4. Carpignano A, Golia E, Di Mauro C, Bouchon S, Nordvik J-P (2009) A methodological approach for the definition of multi-risk maps at regional level: first application. J Risk Res 12(3): 513-534.
5. CIESIN (2005) Gridded Population of the World, Version 3 (GPWv3), Palisades, NY, CIESIN, Columbia University. http//sedac. ciesin. columbia. edu/gpw/index. jsp. Accessed 1st Feb 2012.
6. Dilley M, Chen S, Lerner-Lam A (2005) Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. The World Bank and Columbia University.
7. El-Masri S, Tipple G (1997) Urbanization, poverty and natural disasters: vulnerability of settlements in developing countries. Reconstr After Disasters 12(2): 141-158.
8. Fleming G (2002) Learning to live with rivers: the ICE's report to government. Civ Eng 150: 15-21.
9. Greiving S (2006) Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards: a new methodology. In: P Schmidt-Thome (ed) Natural and Technological Hazards and Risks Affecting the Spatial Development of European Regions, Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 42, 75-82.
10. Helbing D, Kuhnert C (2003) Assessing interaction networks with applications to catastrophe dynamics and disaster management. Physica A 328(3-4): 584-606.
11. Helbing D, Ammoser H, Kühnert C (2005) Disasters as extreme events and the importance of network interactions for disaster response management. In: Albeverio S, Jentsch V, Kantz H (eds) The unimaginable and unpredictable: extreme events in nature and society. Springer, Berlin, pp 319-348.
12. Hengl T and Reuter HI (2010) Worldgrids-a public repository and a WPS for global environmental layers: Slope Map. http://worldgrids. org/doku. php?id=wiki: Slpsrt3. Accessed 9th Feb 2012.
13. Jaiswal K and Wald DJ (2008) Creating a Global Building Inventory for Earthquake Loss Assessment and Risk Management: Open-File Report 2008-1160: Appendix VII: PAGER_database_v1. 4. xls. http//pubs. usgs. gov/of/2008/1160/downloads/PAGER_database/. Accessed 4th Mar 2012.
14. Jaiswal KS, Wald D (2010) An empirical model for global earthquake fatality estimation. Earthq Spectra 26(4): 1017-1037.
15. Kappes M, Keiler M, and Glade T (2010) From Single- to Multi-Hazard Risk Analyses: a concept addressing emerging challenges. In Mountain Risks: Bringing Science to Society, eds J-P Malet, T Glade and N Casagli, Proceedings of the 'Mountain Risks' International Conference, Nov 2010.
16. Kappes M, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64(2): 1925-1958.
17. Kates RW, and Haarmann (1992) Where the poor live: are the assumptions correct? Environment 34, 4, 4-11, 25-28.
18. Keefer DK (1984) Geological society of America bulletin landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Bull 95(4): 406-421.
19. Keefer DK (2002) Investigating landslides caused by earthquakes: a historical review. Surv Geophys 23: 473-510.
20. Korup O (2010) Earthquake-triggered landslides: Spatial patterns and impacts. COGEAR, Module 1a Report.
21. Lerner-Lam A (2007) Assessing global exposure to natural hazards: Progress and future trends. Environ Hazards 7: 10-19.
22. Macintyre AG, Barbera JA, Smith ER (2006) Surviving collapsed structure entrapment after earthquakes: a "time-to rescue" analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med 21(1): 4-19.
23. Marano KD, Wald DJ, Allen TI (2010) Global earthquake casualties due to secondary effects: a quantitative analysis for improving rapid loss analyses. Nat Hazards 52: 319-328.
24. Marzocchi W, Mastellone ML, and Di Ruocco A (2009) Principles of multi-risk assessment: Interaction amongst natural and man-induced risks. European Commission EU 23615.
25. Meunier P, Houvis N, Haines JA (2007) Regional patterns of earthquake-triggered landslides and their relation to ground motion. Geophys Res Lett 34: L20408.
26. Nelson A (2008) Travel time to major cities: A global map of Accessibility. Global environment monitoring unit: Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra Italy. http://www-tem. jrc. it/accessibility. Accessed 9 Mar 2012.
27. Peduzzi P, Dao H, Herold C, Mouton F (2009) Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the disaster risk index. Earth 4: 1149-1159.
28. Rodriguez CE, Bommer JJ, Chandler RJ (1999) Earthquake-induced landslides: 1980-1997. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18: 325-346.
29. Shi P (2005) Theory and practice on disaster system research. Paper for the Fifth Annual IIASA-DPRI Forum.
30. Sidle RC, Ochiai H (2006) Landslides: Processes, prediction, and landuse. Water Resour Monogr. AGU, Washington, DC.
31. UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. UNDP Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New York 146 pp.
32. UNDP (2013) International Human Development Indices: Data. http://hdrstats. undp. org/en/tables/. Accessed 1 Mar 2012.
33. UNU-EHS (2011) World Risk Report 2011.
34. Yetman G, Gaffin SR, and Xing X (2004) Global 15 × 15 Minute Grids of the Downscaled GDP Based on the SRES B2 Scenario, 1990 and 2025. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). http://sedac. ciesin. columbia. edu/data/set/sdp-downscaled-gdp-grid-b2-1990-2025. Accessed 1 Mar 2012.