Onsite provision of specialized contraceptive services: Does title X funding enhance access?

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 428-433

  De Bocanegra, Heike Thiel ^a,b   Riedel, Julie Cross ^a   Menz, Mary ^a   Darney, Philip D ^a   Brindis, Claire D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING; FERTILITY; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RURAL AREA; URBAN AREA; VASECTOMY;

AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; CALIFORNIA; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 84899900037     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: 1931843X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4511     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Frost JJ, Darroch JE, Remez L. Improving contraceptive use in the United States. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) 2008;1:1-8.
2. Frost JJ, Lindberg LD. Reasons for using contraception: Perspectives of US women seeking care at specialized family planning clinics. Contraception 2013;87:465-472.
3. Butler AS, Clayton EW, eds. A review of the HHS Family Planning Program: Mission, management, and measurement of results. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, 2009.
4. Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health. Family PACT program report, FY 2010-2011. San Francisco: University of California, 2012. Available at: http://bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/publications/files/FPACT-ProgramReport-10-11.pdf (accessed June 13, 2013).
5. Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health. Family PACT: An overview. San Francisco: University of California, 2012. Available at: http://bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/publications/files/FPACT-Overview-2012.pdf (accessed June 13, 2013).
6. Family PACT policies, procedures, billing and instruction manual. Sacramento: California Department of Public Health, Office of Family Planning, 2007. Available at: http://www.familypact.org/Providers/policies-procedures- andbilling-instructions (accessed June 13, 2013).
7. Thiel de Bocanegra H, Rostovtseva D, Menz M, Karl J, Darney P. The 2007 Family PACT medical record review: Assessing the quality of services. Sacramento, CA: Bixby Center for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, 2009. Available at: http://bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/publications/files/ MRR%20Full%20Report.pdf (accessed June 13, 2013).
8. Thiel de Bocanegra H, Maguire F, Hulett D, Horsley K, Puffer MJ, Brindis C. Enhancing service delivery through Title X funding: Findings from California. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2012;44:262-269.
9. Moskosky SB, Zapata LB, Whiteman MK, et al. Contraceptive methods available to patients of office-based physicians and Title X clinics: United States, 2009-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:1-4.
10. Frost JJ, Gold RB, Frohwirth L, Blades N. Variation in service delivery practices among clinics providing publicly funded family planning services in 2010. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2012. Available at: http://www.guttmacher. org/pubs/clinic-survey-2010.pdf (accessed June 13, 2013).
11. Cohen SA. The numbers tell the story: The reach and impact of Title X, http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/14/2/gpr140220.html (accessed June 13, 2013).
12. Harper CC, Blum M, Thiel de Bocanegra H, et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: The provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(6): 1359-1369.