Verification of k0-NAA results at the LVR-15 reactor in Řež with the use of Au+Mo+Rb(+Zn) monitor set

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

Volumn 300, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 473-480

  Kubešová, Marie ^a   Krausová, Ivana ^a   Kučera, Jan ^a  

^a NUCLEAR PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Monitor set for long irradiations; Neutron activation analysis; Neutron flux parameters

Indexed keywords

GOLD; MOLYBDENUM; RUBIDIUM; ZINC;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS; NEUTRON RADIATION; NUCLEAR REACTOR; RADIATION MEASUREMENT; RADIATION MONITORING;

EID: 84899894835     PISSN: 02365731     EISSN: 15882780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-014-2991-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 0 users. DSM Research, Geleen
2. Kayzero (2005) Kayzero for Windows, Version 2, User's Manual November (2005). http://www.kayzero.com/KfW%20Manual%20V1.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2013
3. De Corte F (1987) The k 0-standardization method. A move to the optimization of neutron activation analysis. University of Gent, Ghent
4. Koster-Ammerlaan MJJ, Bacchi MA, Bode P (2008) De Nadai Fernandes EA. Appl Rad Isotopes 66:1964-1969
5. 0-NAA method. In: Proceedings of the 12th Int. Conference on Modern Trends in Activation Analysis (MTAA-12), Sept 16-21, 2007, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, p 124
6. Montoya E, Mendoza P, Bedregal P, Ubillús M, Torres B, Cohen IM (2007) The set Au-Zr-Mo-Cr-Lu as multiple reactor flux monitor. The performance of 96Zr and the analysis of inconsistencies. Informe Científico Tecnológico (ICT) and Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear (IPEN), Lima, pp 15-19 ISSN 1684-1662
7. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2010) Chem Listy 105:261-268 (in Czech)
8. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2010) Nucl Instrum Methods A 622:403-406
9. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2011) Nucl Instrum Methods A 654:206-212
10. Kubešová M, Kučera J, Fikrle M (2011) Nucl Instrum Methods A 656:61-64
11. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293:665-674
12. Koster-Ammerlaan MJJ, Bode P, Winkelman AJM (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:569-572
13. Ingelbrecht C, Peetermans F, De Corte F, De Wispelaere A, Vandercasteele C, Courtijn E, D'Hondt P (1991) Nucl Instrum Methods A 303:119-122
14. 0-database (2012). http://www.kayzero.com/k0naa/k0naa/News/ Entries/2012/3/25-The-IUPAC-databasa.html
15. NIST Certificates of Analysis. http://ts.nist.gov/measurementservices/ referencematerials/index.cfm
16. IRMM Certificate of Analysis. http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Pages/ rmcatalogue.aspx
17. Goodfellow, Certificate of Analysis. http://www.goodfellow.com/catalogue/ GFCat4I.php?ewd-token=20huNpDc8E4QioaJUNmiiP fulyESMT&n= Of952yV2Fz5tWw8LKyEz3a4nbvzw7v&ewd-urlNo=GFCat411&Catite= ZR000260&CatSearNum=2
18. Kučera J (1979) Radiochem Radioanal Lett 38:229-246
19. Kubešová M, Kučera J (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293:87-94
20. ISO Guide 13528 (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO, Geneva
21. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4 (2000) Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Second Edition
22. ISO/IEC Guide 98 (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva