Decreased abundance of type III secretion systeminducing signals in Arabidopsis mkp1 enhances resistance against Pseudomonas syringae

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 6846-6851

  Anderson, Jeffrey C ^a,b   Wan, Ying ^a,b   Kim, Young Mo ^c   Pasa Tolic, Ljiljana ^d   Metz, Thomas O ^c   Peck, Scott C ^a,b  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAPK PHOSPHATASE 1; PHOSPHATASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL INFECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOTYPE; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; IMMUNITY; METABOLITE; METABOLOMICS; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV. TOMATO; TYPE III SECRETION SYSTEM;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; GENES, PLANT; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MUTATION; PLANT DISEASES; PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE; RECEPTORS, PATTERN RECOGNITION; VIRULENCE;

EID: 84899860832     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403248111     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Segonzac C, Zipfel C (2011) Activation of plant pattern-recognition receptors by bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 14(1):54-61.
2. O'Brien HE, Thakur S, Guttman DS (2011) Evolution of plant pathogenesis in Pseudomonas syringae: A genomics perspective. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:269-289.
3. Bender CL, Alarcón-Chaidez F, Gross DC (1999) Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxins: Mode of action, regulation, and biosynthesis by peptide and polyketide synthetases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63(2):266-292.
4. Lindeberg M, Cunnac S, Collmer A (2012) Pseudomonas syringae type III effector repertoires: Last words in endless arguments. Trends Microbiol 20(4):199-208.
5. Lindgren PB, Peet RC, Panopoulos NJ (1986) Gene cluster of Pseudomonas syringae pv. "phaseolicola" controls pathogenicity of bean plants and hypersensitivity of nonhost plants. J Bacteriol 168(2):512-522.
6. Penaloza-Vá zquez A, Preston GM, Collmer A, Bender CL (2000) Regulatory interactions between th e Hrp type III protein secretion system and coronatine biosynthesis in Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato DC3000. Microbiology 146(Pt 10):2447-2456.
7. Oh HS, Park DH, Collmer A (2010) Components of the Pseudomo nas syringae type III secretion system can suppress and may elicit plant innate immunity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23(6):727-739.
8. Crabill E, Joe A, Block A, van Rooyen JM, Alfano JR (2010) Plant immunity directly or indirectly restricts the injection of type III effectors by the Pseudomonas syringae type III secretion system. Plant Physiol 154(1):233-244.
9. Salmeron JM, Staskawicz BJ (1993) Molecular characterization and hrp dependence of the avirulence gene avrPto from Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato. Mol Gen Genet 239(1 -2):6-16.
10. Rahme LG, Mindrinos MN, Panopoulos NJ (1992) Plant and environmental sensory signals control the expression of hrp genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. J Bacteriol 174(11):3499-3507.
11. Huynh TV, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz B J (1989) Bacterial blight of soybean: Regulation of a pathogen gene determining host cultivar specificity. Science 245(4924):1374-1377.
12. Tang X, Xiao Y, Zhou JM (2006) Regulation of the type III secretion system in phytopathogenic bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19(11):1159-1166.
13. Aldon D, Brito B, Boucher C, Genin S (2000) A bacterial sensor of plant cell conta ct controls the transcriptional induction of Ralstonia solanacearum pathogenicity genes. EMBO J 19(10):2304-2314.
14. Khokhani D, et al. (2013) Discovery of plant phenolic compounds that act as type III secretion system inhibitors or inducers of the fire blight pathogen, Erwinia amylovora. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(18):5424-5436.
15. Li Y, et al. (2009) The plant phenolic compound p-coumaric acid represses gene expression in the Dickeya dadantii type III secretion system. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(5):1223-1228.
16. Schulte R, Bonas U (1992) A Xanthomonas pathogenicity locus is induced by sucrose and sulfur-containing amino acids. Plant Cell 4(1):79-86.
17. Yang S, et al. (2008) Type III secretion system genes of Dickeya dadantii 3937 are induced by plant phenolic acids. PLoS ONE 3(8):e2973.
18. Anderson JC, et al. (2011) Arabidopsis MAP Kinase Phosphatase (AtMKP1) negatively regulates MPK6-mediated PAMP responses and resistance against bacteria. Plant J 67(2):258-268.
19. Sory MP, Cornelis GR (1994) Translocation of a hybrid YopE-adenylate cyclase from Yersinia enterocolitica into HeLa cells. Mol Microbiol 14(3):583-594.
20. Schechter LM Roberts KA Jamir Y Alfano JR Collmer A 2004 Pseudomonas syringae type III secretion system targeting signals and novel effectors studi ed with a Cya translocation reporter J Bacteriol 186 2 543-555
21. Keshavarzi M, et al. (2004) Basal defenses induced in pepper by lipopolysaccharides are suppressed by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17(7):805-815.
22. Durrett TP, Gassmann W, Rogers EE (2007) The FRD3-mediated efflux of citrate into the root vasculature is necessary for efficient iron translocation. Plant Physiol 144(1): 197-205.
23. White MC, Decker AM, Chaney RL (1981) Metal complexation in xylem fluid I. Chemical composition of tomato and soybean stem exudate. Plant Physiol 67(2): 292-300.
24. Zipfel C, et al. (2006) Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 125(4):749-760.
25. Cai R, et al. (2011) The plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato is genetically monomorphic and under strong selection to evade tomato immunity. PLoS Pathog 7(8):e1002130.
26. Clarke CR, et al. (2013) Allelic variation in two distinct Pseudomonas syringae flagellin epitopes modulates the strength of plant immune responses but not bacterial motility. New Phytol 200(3):847-860, 10.1111/nph.1 2408.
27. Takeuchi K, et al. (2003) Flagellin glycosylation island in Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea and its role in host specificity. J Bacteriol 185(22):6658-6665.
28. Brencic A, Winans SC (2005) Detection of and response to signals involved in hostmicrobe interactions by plant-associated bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69(1): 155-194.
29. Mo YY, Gross DC (1991) Plant signal molecules activate the syrB gene, which is required for syringomycin production by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. J Bacteriol 173(18):5784-5792.
30. Cuppels DA ( 1988) Chemotaxis by Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato. Appl Environ Microbiol 54(3):629-632.
31. Li XZ, Starratt AN, Cuppels DA (1998) Identification of tomato leaf factors that activate toxin gene expression in Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato DC3000. Phytopathology 88(10):1094-1100.
32. Sreedharan A, Penaloza-Vazquez A, Kunkel BN, Bender CL (2006) CorR regulates multiple co mponents of virulence in Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato DC3000. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19(7):768-779.
33. Bulgarelli D, et al. (2012) Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis rootinhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488(7409):91-95.
34. Lundberg DS, et al. (2012) Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488(7409):86-90.
35. Rico A, Preston GM (2008) Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato DC3000 uses constitutive and apoplast-induced nutrient assimilation pathways to catabolize nutrients that are abundant in the tomato apoplast. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 21(2):269-282.
36. Kim YM, et al. (2011) Formation of dehydroalanine from mimosine and cysteine: Artifacts in gas chromatography/mass spectrometry based metabolomics. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25(17):2561-2564.
37. Hiller K, et al. (2009) MetaboliteDetector: Comprehensive analysis tool for targeted and nontargeted GC/MS based metabolome analysis. Anal Chem 81(9):3429-3439.
38. Kind T, et al. (2009) FiehnLib: Mass spectral and retention index libraries for metabolomics based on quadrupole and time-of-flight gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 81(24):10038-10048.
39. Sumner LW, et al. (2007) Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Ana lysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI). Metabolomics 3(3):211-221.
40. Fiehn O, et al. (2008) Quality control for plant metabolomics: Reporting MSIcompliant studies. Plant J 53(4):691-704.
41. Shan L He P Zhou JM Tang X 2000 A cluster of mutations disrupt the avirulence but not the virulence function of AvrPto Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13 6 592-598
42. Kunze G, et al. (2004) The N terminus of bacterial elongation factor Tu elicits innate immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell 16(12):3496-3507.