Modified human contrast sensitivity function based phase mask for susceptibility-weighted imaging

NeuroImage: Clinical

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages 765-778

  Wang, Wei Hsin ^a   Reutens, David C ^a   Yang, Zhengyi ^a   Nguyen, Giang ^a   Vegh, Viktor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Human contrast sensitivity function; Phase filtering; Phase mask; Susceptibility weighted imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; EX VIVO STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MOUSE; NEUROIMAGING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; VISUAL INFORMATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; DENTATE GYRUS; HIPPOCAMPUS; MASK; PHASE MASK; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; VISION; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE;

EID: 84899849283     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22131582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barnes S., Haacke E.M. Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and MR Angiography 2012 Springer New York, NY.
2. Beauchamp M.H., Ditchfield M., Babl F.E., Kean M., Catroppa C., Yeates K.O., Anderson V. Detecting traumatic brain lesions in children: CT versus MRI versus susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) Journal of Neurotrauma 28 2011 915 927 10.1089/neu.2010.1712 21501069
3. Daly S.J. Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity IS&T/SPIE's Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology 1992 International Society for Optics and Photonics 2 15
4. de Champfleur N.M., Langlois C., Ankenbrandt W.J., le Bars E., Leroy M.A., Duffau H., Bonafé A., Jaffe J., Awad I.A., Labauge P. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral cavernous malformations with susceptibility-weighted imaging Neurosurgery 68 2011 641 647 21164377
5. Deistung A., Rauscher A., Sedlacik J., Stadler J., Witoszynskyj S., Reichenbach J.R. Susceptibility weighted imaging at ultra high magnetic field strengths: theoretical considerations and experimental results Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 60 2008 1155 1168 10.1002/mrm.21754 18956467
6. Duyn J., van Gelderen P., Li T., de Zwart J., Koretsky A., Fukunaga M. High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 2007 11796 11801 10.1073/pnas.0610821104 17586684 (Pubitemid 47175092)
7. Duyn J.H. Study of brain anatomy with high-field MRI: recent progress Magnetic Resonance Imaging 28 2010 1210 1215 10.1016/j.mri.2010.02.007 20392587
8. Duyn J.H., van Gelderen P., Li T.-Q., de Zwart J.A., Koretsky A.P., Fukunaga M. High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 2007 11796 11801 10.1073/pnas.0610821104 17586684 (Pubitemid 47175092)
9. Farrell J.E. Image quality evaluation L.W. Macdonald M.R. Luo In Color Imaging: Vision and Technology 1999 Wiley
10. Fazel S.A.A., Gal Y., Yang Z., Vegh V. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of six image fusion methodologies and their application to medical imaging International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications 2011 Noosa Queensland, Australia
11. Haacke E., Mittal S., Wu Z., Neelavalli J., Cheng Y. Susceptibility- weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1 AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 30 2009 19 30 19039041
12. Haacke E., Xu Y., Cheng Y., Reichenbach J. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52 2004 612 618 10.1002/mrm.20198 (Pubitemid 39108975)
13. Haacke E.M., Kirsch W., Ayaz M., Khan A., Manova E.S., Krishnamurthy B., Gollapalli L., Ciulla C., Kim I., Petersen F. Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI 26 2007 256 264 10.1002/jmri.22987 17654738 (Pubitemid 47257722)
14. Haacke E.M., Obenaus A., Cheng N.Y.C., House M.J., Liu Q., Neelavalli J., Ogg R.J., Khan A., Ayaz M., Kirsch W. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging 23 2005 1 25 10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.001 15733784 (Pubitemid 40269946)
15. Haacke E.M., Xu Y., Cheng Y.C.N., Reichenbach J.R. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52 2004 612 618 10.1002/mrm.20198 (Pubitemid 39108975)
16. Haacke E.M., Ye Y. The role of susceptibility weighted imaging in functional MRI Neuroimage 62 2012 923 929 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.020 22245649
17. Hagberg G.E., Bianciardi M., Brainovich V., Cassara A.M., Maraviglia B. Phase stability in fMRI time series: effect of noise regression, off-resonance correction and spatial filtering techniques Neuroimage 59 2012 3748 3761 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.095 22079450
18. Jagadeesan B.D., Almandoz J.E.D., Moran C.J., Benzinger T.L.S. Accuracy of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the detection of arteriovenous shunting in vascular malformations of the brain Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 42 2011 87 92 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584862 21088245
19. Kelly D.H. Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina Vision Research 15 1975 665 672 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90282-5 1138482
20. Lee J., Shmueli K., Kang B.-T., Yao B., Fukunaga M., van Gelderen P., Palumbo S., Bosetti F., Silva A.C., Duyn J.H. The contribution of myelin to magnetic susceptibility-weighted contrasts in high-field MRI of the brain Neuroimage 59 2012 3967 3975 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.076 22056461
21. Lee Y., Han Y., Park H. A new susceptibility-weighted image reconstruction method for the reduction of background phase artifacts Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2013
22. Liu T., Khalidov I., de Rochefort L., Spincemaille P., Liu J., Tsiouris A.J., Wang Y. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF) NMR in Biomedicine 24 2011 1129 1136 10.1002/nbm.1670 21387445
23. Mannos J., Sakrison D. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 20 1974 525 536 10.1109/TIT.1974.1055250
24. Meoded A., Poretti A., Benson J.E., Tekes A., Huisman T.A. Evaluation of the ischemic penumbra focusing on the venous drainage: the role of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) in pediatric ischemic cerebral stroke Journal of Neuroradiology. Journal de Neuroradiologie 2013
25. Mittal S., Wu Z., Neelavalli J., Haacke E. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2 AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 30 2009 232 252 19131406
26. Papari G., Campisi P., Petkov N., Neri A. A biologically motivated multiresolution approach to contour detection EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2007 2007 119
27. Paxinos G., Franklin K. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: Compact Second Edition 2003 Academic San Diego
28. Petridou N., Schäfer A., Gowland P., Bowtell R. Phase vs. magnitude information in functional magnetic resonance imaging time series: toward understanding the noise Magnetic Resonance Imaging 27 2009 1046 1057 10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.006 19369024
29. Rauscher A., Barth M., Reichenbach J.R., Stollberger R., Moser E. Automated unwrapping of MR phase images applied to BOLD MR-venography at 3 Tesla Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI 18 2003 175 180 10.1002/jmri.10346 12884329 (Pubitemid 36935948)
30. Richards W., Nishihara H., Dawson B. CARTOON: A Biologically Motivated Edge Detection Algorithm 1982 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
31. Robinson R.J., Bhuta S. Susceptibility-weighted imaging of the brain: current utility and potential applications Journal of Neuroimaging: Official Journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging 21 2011 e189 e204 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00516.x 21281380
32. Vegh V., Kording F., Venkatachalam T.K., Reutens D.C. Magnetic susceptibility derived from T2 and T2*-weighted magnetic resonance magnitude images Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering 41 2012 28 36
33. Wang Y., Yu Y., Li D., Bae K.T., Brown J.J., Lin W., Haacke E.M. Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI 12 2000 661 670 10.1002/1522-2586(200011)12:5<661::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-L 11050635
34. Zivadinov R., Brown M.H., Schirda C.V., Poloni G.U., Bergsland N., Magnano C.R., Durfee J., Kennedy C., Carl E., Hagemeier J. Abnormal subcortical deep-gray matter susceptibility-weighted imaging filtered phase measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis: a case-control study Neuroimage 59 2012 331 339 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.045 21820063