System-level benefits of extracting and treating saline water from geologic formations during national-scale carbon capture and storage

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 25, Issue , 2014, Pages 186-197

  Roach, Jesse D ^a   Heath, Jason E ^a   Kobos, Peter H ^a   Klise, Geoffrey T ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Brine extraction; Injectivity; Marginal abatement cost curves; NatCarb; WECSsim

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; EXTRACTION; INSURANCE; SALINE WATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ACCURATE QUANTIFICATIONS; ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION; CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE; INJECTIVITY; MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST CURVES; NATCARB; TECHNICAL CHALLENGES; WECSSIM;

CARBON CAPTURE;

ABATEMENT COST; BOUNDARY CONDITION; BRINE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84899846506     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Averyt K., Macknick J., Rogers J., Madden N., Fisher J., Meldrum J., Newmark N. Water use for electricity in the United States: an analysis of reported and calculated water use information for 2008. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8(1):015001.
2. 2 injection and water production to optimise aquifer storage capacity. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5(3):555-564.
3. 2 storage in saline formations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2012, 7:168-180.
4. Breunig H.M., Birkholzer J.T., Borgia A., Oldenburg C.M., Price P.N., McKone T.E. Regional evaluation of brine management for geologic carbon sequestration. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2013, 14:39-48.
5. 2 reservoir management for carbon storage: analysis of operation strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2012, 6:230-245.
6. Cavanagh A.J., Haszeldine R.S., Blunt M.J. Open or closed: a discussion of the mistaken assumptions in the economides analysis of carbon sequestration. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2010, 74(1-2):107-110.
7. Cook J., Nuccitelli D., Green S.A., Richardson M., Winkler B., Painting R., Way R., Jacobs P., Skuce A. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8(2):024024.
8. Dooley J.J., Davidson C.L. A Brief Technical Critique of Ehlig Economides and Economides 2010: "Sequestering Carbon Dioxide in a Closed Underground Volume" 2010, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, (retrieved 15.07.13). http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-19249.pdf.
9. 2-storage supply curve for North America and its implications for the deployment of carbon dioxide capture and storage systems. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 2004, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
10. 2 in deep-saline aquifers. Energy Econ. 2012, 34(5):1569-1579.
11. Eccles J.K., Pratson L. Economic evaluation of offshore storage potential in the US Exclusive Economic Zone. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2013, 3(1):84-95.
12. Eccles J.K., Pratson L. A "carbonshed" assessment of small- vs. large scale CCS deployment in the continental US. Appl. Energy 2014, 113:352-361.
13. Ehlig-Economides C., Economides M.J. Sequestering carbon dioxide in a closed underground volume. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2010, 70:123-130.
14. EPA Environmental Protection Agency The Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database for 2007, (eGRID2007) 2007, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/index.html.
15. Global CCS Institute The Global Status of CCS: 2012 2012, Global CCS Institute, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/global-status-ccs-2012, 4th ed.
16. 2 Recovery, February 2002, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/analysis/pubs/Evaluation_of_Fossil_Fuel_Power_Plants_with_CO2_Recovery.pdf.
17. Heath J.E., Kobos P.H., Roach J.D., Dewers T.A., McKenna S.A. Geologic heterogeneity and economic uncertainty of subsurface carbon dioxide storage. SPE Econ. Manage. 2012, 4(1):32-41.
18. 2 storage efficiency and pressure buildup. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:1067-1074.
19. IEA International Energy Agency Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation - Working Paper 2011, International Energy Agency, Paris, (retrieved 09.07.13). http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/costperf_ccs_powergen.pdf.
20. 2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion; Highlights 2012, International Energy Agency, Paris, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CO2emissionfromfuelcombustionHIGHLIGHTSMarch2013.pdf.
21. IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
22. 2 Flooding. SPE Monograph Series 2002, vol. 22. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
23. Keating G.N., Middleton R.S., Stauffer P.H., Viswanathan H.S., Letellier B.C., Pasqualini D., Pawar R.J., Wolfsberg A.V. Mesoscale carbon sequestration site screening and CCS infrastructure analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:215-222.
24. 2 capture and storage utilizing non-traditional waters from geologic saline formations. Hydrogeol. J. 2013, 21(3):587-604.
25. Kobos P.H., Krumhansl J.L., Dewers T.A., Cappelle M.A., Heath J.E. Study of the Use of Deep Saline Formations for Combined Thermoelectric Power Plant Water Needs and Carbon Sequestration at a Regional Scale: Phase II Report 2010, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, (retrieved 20.08.13). http://energy.sandia.gov/wp/wp-content/gallery/uploads/Phase-II-WECS-08_014050-SAND2010_8073P.pdf.
26. Kobos P.H., Cappelle M.A., Krumhansl J.L., Dewers T.A., McNemar A., Borns D. Combining power plant water needs and carbon dioxide storage using saline formations: implications for carbon dioxide and water management policies. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5(4):899-910.
27. 2 storage: geological injection limits and consequences for carbon management costs. USAEE/IAEE North American Conference Proceedings 2011, U.S. Association for Energy Economics, Washington, DC, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.usaee.org/usaee2011/submissions/OnlineProceedings/1918-Kobos%20et%20al%202011%20USAEE%20SAND2011_5975C.pdf.
28. Kobos P.H., Roach J.D., Klise G.T., Heath J.E., Dewers T.A., Gutierrez K.A., Malczynski L.A., Borns D.J., McNemar A. The Water, Energy, and Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Simulation Model (WECSsim): A User's Manual 2013, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, SAND2014-0687.
29. 2 geosequestration on overlying freshwater aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44(23):9225-9232.
30. 2 injection sites on formation stability. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5(1):69-74.
31. Munson B.R., Young D.F., Okiishi T.H. Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics 1994, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
32. NETL National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Dioxide Capture from Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants 2007, National Energy Technology Laboratory, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/refshelf/PubDetails.aspx%3FAction=View%26PubId=225.
33. NETL National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap and Program Plan 2007 2007, Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy/Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/project%20portfolio/2007/2007roadmap.pdf.
34. NETL National Energy Technology Laboratory Estimating Freshwater Needs to Meet Future Thermoelectric Generation Requirements 2008, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory.
35. NETL National Energy Technology Laboratory National Carbon Sequestration Database and Geographic Information System (NatCarb) 2008, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, WV.
36. NETL National Energy Technology Laboratory Water Requirements for Existing and Emerging Thermoelectric Plant Technologies 2008, U.S. Department of Energy.
37. NETL National Energy Technology Laboratory 2012 Technology Readiness Assessment - Overview; Pathway for readying the next generation of affordable clean energy technology - Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage, (CCUS) 2012, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, (retrieved 08.07.13). http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/refshelf/TRA%20Overview%20Report_121112_FINAL_1.pdf.
38. 2 sequestration. 6th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference 2002, 1069-1074.
39. Pruess K., Oldenburg C., Moridis G. TOUGH2 User's Guide, Version 2.0, Report LBNL-43134 1999, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
40. Roach J.D., Kobos P.H., Klise G.T., Krumhansl J.L., McNemar A. New demands, new supplies: a national look at the water balance of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010 2010, abstract #H21A-1021.
41. Stauffer P.H., Viswanathan H.S., Pawar R.J., Guthrie G.D. A system model for geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43(3):565-570.
42. Szulczewski M.L., MacMinn C.W., Herzog H.J., Juanes R. Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109(14):5185-5189.
43. Tidwell V., Moreland B., Roberts B., Passell H., Jensen D., Forsgren C., Sehlke G., Cook M., King C., Larsen S. Mapping water availability and cost in the Western United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, in press.
44. USBR United States Bureau of Reclamation Desalting Handbook for Planners 2003, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. 3rd ed.
45. 2 "Molecular Basket" adsorbent. ACS Fuels 2003, 48:162-163. New Orleans: American Chemical Society - Division of Energy & Fuels, http://web.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel/preprint%20archive/Files/48_1_New%20Orleans__03-03_0429.pdf.
46. Zammit K., DiFilippo M. Use of Produced Water in Recirculating Cooling Systems at Power Generating Facilities, Treatment & Disposal Analysis: Semi-Annual Technical Progress Report, April 12, 2004 to October 22, 2004 2004, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto.