United states birth weight reference corrected for implausible gestational age estimates

Pediatrics

Volumn 133, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 844-853

  Talge, Nicole M ^a   Mudd, Lanay M ^b   Sikorskii, Alla ^b   Basso, Olga ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Birth weight; Gestational age; Growth charts; Reference; Small for gestational age; United States

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CALCULATION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; INFANT; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD; MALE; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; POSTMATURITY; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; UNITED STATES; BIRTH CERTIFICATE; NEWBORN; SEX DIFFERENCE;

BIRTH CERTIFICATES; BIRTH WEIGHT; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84899830714     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3285     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163-168
2. Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH. 1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3(4):225-231
3. Zhang J, Bowes WA Jr. Birth-weight-forgestational- age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(2):200-208
4. Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:6
5. Qin C, Dietz PM, England LJ, Martin JA, Callaghan WM. Effects of different dataediting methods on trends in race-specific preterm delivery rates, United States, 1990- 2002. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21 (suppl 2):41-49
6. Fenton TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:13
7. Ananth CV. Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(suppl 2):22-30
8. Savitz DA, Terry JW Jr, Dole N, Thorp JM Jr, Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6): 1660-1666
9. Gjessing HK, Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ. Errors in gestational age: evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(2):213-218
10. Alexander GR, Tompkins ME, Petersen DJ, Hulsey TC, Mor J. Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy. Public Health Rep. 1995; 110(4):395-402
11. Callaghan WM, Dietz PM. Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(7):826-836
12. Basso O, Wilcox A. Mortality risk among preterm babies: immaturity versus underlying pathology. Epidemiology. 2010;21 (4):521-527
13. National Center for Health Statistics. The 1989 Revision of the U.S. Standard Certificates and Reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1989
14. National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the Certificate of Live Birth and Report of Fetal Death. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003
15. Himes JH, Hoaglin DC. Resistant cross-age smoothing of age-specific percentiles for growth reference data. Am J Hum Biol. 1989;1(2):165-173
16. Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE. Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(4):335-343
17. Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, et al; Fetal/ Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2). Available at: www. pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/108/2/e35
18. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59
19. Olsen IE, Groveman SA, Lawson ML, Clark RH, Zemel BS. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010;125(2). Available at: www.pediatrics. org/cgi/content/full/125/2/e214
20. Li J, Robbins S, Lamm SH. The influence of misclassification bias on the reported rates of congenital anomalies on the birth certificates for West Virginia - a consequence of an open-ended query. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(3): 140-151
21. Watkins ML, Edmonds L, McClearn A, Mullins L, Mulinare J, Khoury M. The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(5): 731-734
22. Banerjee E, Zabel E, Alexander B. Comparison of defects identified through Minnesota's Birth Defects Information System And Vital Records, 2006-2008. J Registry Manag. Spring 2012;39(1):8-12
23. Zollinger TW, Przybylski MJ, Gamache RE. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16(1):1-10
24. Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(suppl 2):62-71
25. Simic M, Wahlin IA, Marsál K, Källén K. Maternal obesity is a potential source of error in mid-trimester ultrasound estimation of gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(1):48-53
26. Henriksen TB, Wilcox AJ, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology. 1995;6(5):533-537
27. Wolfe HM, Sokol RJ, Martier SM, Zador IE. Maternal obesity: a potential source of error in sonographic prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76(3 Pt 1):339-342
28. Wingate MS, Alexander GR, Buekens P, Vahratian A. Comparison of gestational age classifications: date of last menstrual period vs. clinical estimate. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17 (6):425-430
29. Clausson B, Cnattingius S, Axelsson O. Outcomes of post-term births: the role of fetal growth restriction and malformations. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(5 pt 1):758-762
30. Hutcheon JA, Platt RW. The missing data problem in birth weight percentiles and thresholds for "small-for-gestational-age". Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(7):786-792
31. Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):28.e1-28.e8
32. Hutcheon JA, Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, Kramer MS. The case against customised birthweight standards. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25(1):11-16
33. Haglund B. Birthweight distributions by gestational age: comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using data from the Swedish Birth Registry. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(suppl 2):72-78
34. Carberry AE, Raynes-Greenow CH, Turner RM, Jeffery HE. Customized versus population-based birth weight charts for the detection of neonatal growth and perinatal morbidity in a cross-sectional study of term neonates. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(8):1301-1308
35. Hutcheon JA, Walker M, Platt RW. Assessing the value of customized birth weight percentiles. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(4):459-467