The evolving science of stream restoration

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 194, Issue , 2011, Pages 1-8

  Bennett, Sean J ^a   Simon, Andrew ^b   Castro, Janine M ^c   Atkinson, Joseph F ^d   Bronner, Colleen E ^d   Blersch, Stacey S ^d   Rabideau, Alan J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b USDA ARS NATIONAL SEDIMENTATION LABORATORY   (United States)

^c U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^d the State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899818665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/2011GM001099     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Baldigo, B. P., A. G. Ernst, D. R. Warren., and S. J. Miller (2010), Variable responses of fish assemblages, habitat, and stability to natural-channel-design restoration in Catskill Mountain streams, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 139, 449-467.
2. Bennett, S. J., W. Wu, C. V. Alonso, and S. S. Y. Wang (2008), Modeling fluvial response to in-stream woody vegetation: Implications for stream corridor restoration, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 33, 890-909.
3. Bernhardt, E. S., et al. (2005), Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts, Science, 308, 636-637.
4. Bernhardt, E. S., et al. (2007), Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners, Restor. Ecol., 15, 482-493.
5. Billi, P., M. Rinaldi, and A. Simon (1997), Disturbance and adjustment of the Arno River, central Italy I: Historical perspective, the last 2,000 years, in Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision, edited by S. S. Y.Wang, E. J. Langendoen, and F. D. Shields Jr., pp. 256-261, Univ. of Miss., Oxford.
6. Booth, D. B. (2005), Challenges and prospects for restoring urban streams: A perspective from the Pacific Northwest of North America, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 724-737.
7. Booth, D. B. (2007), Regional perspectives of stream restoration-The Pacific Northwest, in Regional Perspectives of Stream Restoration: Motivations and Approaches, edited by J. Marr, Stream Restor. Networker, 1, 2-3.
8. Brierley, G., and K. Fryirs (Eds.) (2008), River Futures: An Integrative Scientific Approach to River Repair, 328 pp., Island Press, Washington, D. C.
9. Brookes, A. (1988), Channelized Rivers: Perspectives for Environmental Management, 326 pp., John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
10. Brookes, A., and F. D. Shields Jr. (Eds.) (1996), River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects, 433 pp., John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
11. Cantelli, A., C. Paola, and G. Parker (2004), Experiments on upstream-migrating erosional narrowing and widening of an incisional channel caused by dam removal, Water Resour. Res., 40, W03304, doi:10.1029/2003WR002940.
12. Darby, S., and D. Sear (Eds.) (2008), River Restoration: Managing the Uncertainty in Restoring Physical Habitat, 315 pp., John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
13. Doll, B. A., G. L. Grabow, K. R. Hall, J. Halley, W. A. Harman, G. D. Jennings, and D. E. Wise (2003), Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel Design Handbook, 128 pp., N. C. Stream Restoration Inst., N. C. State Univ., Raleigh.
14. Dufour, S., and H. Piégay (2009), From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: Forget natural references and focus on human benefits, River Res. Appl., 25, 568-581.
15. Eden, S., and S. Tunstall (2006), Ecological versus social restoration? How urban river restoration challenges but also fails to challenge the science-policy nexus in the United Kingdom, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 24, 661-680.
16. Froriep, S. (1986), Ein Wasserweg in Bithynien. Bemühungen der Römer, Byzantiner und Osmanen, Antike Welt, 2, 39-50.
17. Gillian, S., K. Boyd, T. Hoitsma, and M. Kauffman (2005), Challenges in developing and implementing ecological standards for geomorphic river restoration projects: A practitioner's response to Palmer et al. (2005), J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 223-227.
18. Goodwin, R. A., J. M. Nestler, J. J. Anderson, L. J.Weber, and D. P. Loucks (2006), Forecasting 3-D fish movement behavior using a Eulerian-Lagrangian-agent method (ELAM), Ecol. Modell., 192, 197-223.
19. Hadfield, C. (1986), World Canals: Inland Navigation Past and Present, 426 pp., Facts on File Publ., New York.
20. Hey, R. D. (1996), Environmentally sensitive river engineering, in River Restoration, edited by G. Petts and P. Calow, pp. 80-105, Blackwell Sci., Oxford, U. K.
21. Hidinger, L. L., and A. E. Morgan (1912), Drainage problems of the Wolf, Hatchie, and South Fork forked deer rivers, in west Tennessee, in The Resources of Tennessee, Tenn. Geol. Surv., 2(6), 231-249.
22. Hodge, A. T. (2000), Reservoirs and dams, in Handbook of Ancient Water Technology, Technol. Change History, vol. 2, edited by Ú. Wikander, pp. 331-339, Brill, Leiden, Netherlands.
23. Hodge, A. T. (2002), Roman Aqueducts and Water Supply, 2nd ed., 505 pp., Duckworth, London.
24. Ireland, H. A., C. F. S. Sharpe, and D. H. Eargle (1939), Principles of gully erosion in the piedmont of South Carolina, Tech. Bull. 633, 142 pp., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Washington, D. C.
25. Kemp, P. S., and J. G. Williams (2008), Response of migrating Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts to instream structure associated with culverts, River Res. Appl., 24, 571-579.
26. Kondolf, M. G., and C. N. Yang (2008), Planning river restoration projects: Social and cultural dimensions, in River Restoration: Managing The Uncertainty in Restoring Physical Habitat, edited by S. Darby and D. Sear, pp. 43-60, John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
27. Kuhnle, R. A., C. V. Alonso, and F. D. Shields Jr. (2002), Local scour associated with angled spur dikes, J. Hydraul. Eng., 128, 1087-1093.
28. Kuhnle, R. A., Y. Jia, and C. V. Alonso (2008), Measured and simulated flow near a submerged spur dike, J. Hydraul. Eng., 134, 916-924.
29. Langendoen, E. J. (2011), Application of the CONCEPTS channel evolution model in stream restoration strategies, in Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses, and Tools, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., doi: 10.1029/2010GM000986, this volume.
30. Lave, R. (2009), The controversy over natural channel design: Substantive explanations and potential avenues for resolution, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45, 1519-1532.
31. Lave, R., M. Doyle, and M. Robertson (2010), Privatizing stream restoration in the U.S, Soc. Stud. Sci., 40, 677-703.
32. Marr, J. (2009), Developing the practice: Perspectives on training and education in river restoration, Stream Restor. Networker, 3(1), 1.
33. Merten, E. C., W. Hintz, A. Lightbody, and T. Wellnitz (2010), Macroinvertebrate grazers, current velocity, and bedload transport rate influence periphytic accrual in a field-scale experimental stream, Hydrobiologia, 652, 179-184.
34. Miller, J. R., and R. C. Kochel (2010), Assessment of channel dynamics, in-stream structures and post-project channel adjustments in North Carolina and its implications to effective stream restoration, Environ. Earth Sci., 59, 1681-1692.
35. Moore, C. T. (1917), Drainage districts in southeastern Nebraska, NGS-7-17, Nebr. Geol. Surv., Lincoln.
36. Moore, F. G. (1950), Three canal projects, Roman and Byzantine, Am. J. Archaeol., 54, 97-111.
37. Nagle, G. (2007), Evaluating 'natural channel design' stream projects, Hydrol. Processes, 21, 2539-2545.
38. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2007), National Engineering Handbook, Part 654, Stream Restoration Design, U.S. Dep. of Agric., Washington, D. C. (Available at http://policy. nrcs.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent. aspx?content=17807.wba)
39. Palmer, M. A., and E. S. Bernhardt (2006), Hydroecology and river restoration: Ripe for research and synthesis, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S07, doi:10.1029/2005WR004354.
40. Palmer, M. A., et al. (2005), Standards for ecologically successful river restoration, J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 208-217.
41. Palmer, M. A., H. L. Menninger, and E. Bernhardt (2010), River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: A failure of theory or practice?, Freshwater Biol., 55, 205-222.
42. Reiners,W. A., and J. A. Lockwood (2010), Philosophical Foundations for the Practice of Ecology, 226 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
43. Rice, S. P., T. Buffin-Bélanager, J. Lancaster, and I. Reid (2008), Movements of a macroinvertebrate (Potamophylax latipennis) across a gravel-bed substrate: Effects of local hydraulics and micro-topography under increasing discharge, in Gravel-Bed Rivers: From Process Understanding to River Restoration, edited by H. Habersack et al., pp. 637-660, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
44. Rodda, J. C., and L. Ubertini (Eds.) (2004), The basis of civilization-Water science?, IAHS Publ., 286, 334 pp.
45. Rosgen, D. L. (2008), Discussion -"Critical evaluation of how the Rosgen classification and associated 'natural channel design' methods fail to integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel responses" by A. Simon, M. Doyle, M. Kondolf, F. D. Shields Jr., B. Rhoads, and M. McPhillips, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 44, 782-792.
46. Salehin, M., A. I. Packman, and M. Paradis (2004), Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneous streambeds: Laboratory experiments and modeling, Water Resour. Res., 40, W11504, doi:10.1029/2003WR002567.
47. Schörner, H. (2000), Künstliche Schiffahrtskanäle in der Antike, der sogenannte antike Suez-Kanal, Skyllis, 3, 28-43.
48. Shields, F. D., Jr., R. R. Copeland, P. C. Klingeman, M. W. Doyle, and A. Simon (2003), Design for stream restoration, J. Hydraul. Eng., 129, 575-584.
49. Shields, F. D., Jr., S. S. Knight, and C. M. Cooper (2005), Longterm monitoring: Stream ecosystem restoration: Is watershedscale treatment effective without instream habitat rehabilitation?, Ecol. Restor., 23, 103-109.
50. Shields, F. D., Jr., S. S. Knight, and C. M. Cooper (2007), Can warm water streams be rehabilitated using watershed-scale standard erosion control measures alone?, Environ. Manage., 40, 62-79.
51. Simon, A. (1994), Gradation processes and channel evolution in modified west Tennessee streams: Process, response, and form, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1470, 84 pp.
52. Simon, A., A. Curini, S. E. Darby, and E. J. Langendoen (2000), Bank and near-bank processes in an incised channel, Geomorphology, 35, 193-217.
53. Simon, A., M. Doyle, M. Kondolf, F. D. Shields Jr., B. Rhoads, and M. McPhillips (2007), Critical evaluation of how the Rosgen classification and associated "natural channel design" methods fail to integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel response, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43, 1117-1131.
54. Simon, A., M. Doyle, M. Kondolf, F. D. Shields Jr., B. Rhoads, and M. McPhillips (2008), Reply to discussion by Dave Rosgen on "Critical evaluation of how the Rosgen classification and associated 'natural channel design' methods fail to integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel responses," J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 44, 793-802.
55. Smith, S. M., and K. L. Prestegaard (2005), Hydraulic performance of a morphology-based stream channel design, Water Resour. Res., 41, W11413, doi:10.1029/2004WR003926.
56. Stewardson, M., and I. Rutherford (2008), Conceptual and mathematical modelling in river restoration: Do we have unreasonable confidence?, in River Restoration: Managing the Uncertainty in Restoring Physical Habitat, edited by S. Darby and D. Sear, pp. 61-78, John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
57. Thorp, J., M. Thoms, and M. Delong (2008), The Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis: Toward Conceptual Cohesiveness in River Science, 232 pp., Academic, Oxford, U. K.
58. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2006), Wadeable streams assessment: A collaborative survey of the nation's streams, Rep. EPA 841-B-06-002, Washington, D. C.
59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2009), National water quality inventory: Report to Congress, 2004 reporting cycle, Rep. EPA 841-R-08-001, Washington, D. C.
60. Wallerstein, N., C. V. Alonso, S. J. Bennett, and C. R. Thorne (2001), Distorted Froude-scaled flume analysis of large woody debris, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 26, 1265-1283.
61. Watson, C. C., D. S. Biedenharn, and C. R. Thorne (2005), Stream Rehabilitation Version 1.0, 201 pp., Cottonwood Res. LLC, Fort Collins, Colo.
62. Wheaton, J. M., S. E. Darby, and D. A. Sear (2008), The scope of uncertainties in river restoration, in River Restoration: Managing the Uncertainty in Restoring Physical Habitat, edited by S. Darby and D. Sear, pp. 21-39, John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
63. Whitacre, H. W., B. B. Roper, and J. L. Kershner (2007), A comparison of protocols and observer precision for measuring physical stream attributes, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43, 923-937.
64. Wohl, E., P. L. Angermeier, B. Bledsoe, G. M. Kondolf, L. Mac-Donnell, D. M. Merritt, M. A. Palmer, N. L. Poff, and D. Tarboton (2005), River restoration, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10301, doi:10.1029/2005WR003985.
65. Woolsey, S., et al. (2007), A strategy to assess river restoration success, Freshwater Biol., 52, 752-769.
66. Wu, W., F. D. Shields Jr., S. J. Bennett, and S. S. Y. Wang (2005), A depth-averaged two-dimensional model for flow, sediment transport, and bed topography in curved channels with riparian vegetation, Water Resour. Res., 41, W03015, doi:10.1029/2004WR003730.