Development of quantitative evaluation method regarding value and environmental impact of cities

Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 112-120

  Yamauchi, Takahiro ^a   Kutami, Michinori ^a   Konishi Nagano, Tomoko ^a  

^a FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; FOCUSING;

FUJITSU; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; IMPACT EVALUATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY; NEW SERVICES; PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION METHODS; SMART CITIES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

EID: 84899798915     PISSN: 00162523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. United Nations Environment Programme: Sustainable, Resource Efficient Cities-Making it Happen! (2012). http://www.unep.org/urban-environment/PDFs/ SustainableResourceEfficientCities.pdf
2. S. Murakami et al.: Development of Comprehensive Assessment Tool for the Built Environment of Cities: CASBEE-City-Concept and Framework of Assessment System-. AIJ Journal of Technology and Design, Vol. 17, No. 35, pp. 239-244 (2011) (in Japanese).
3. U.S. Green Building Council: LEED Reference Guide for Green Neighborhood Development 2009 Edition, (2009)
4. The Mori Memorial Foundation: Global Power City Index YEARBOOK2013 (2013). http://www.mori-m-foundation.or.jp/english/published/gpci/gpciyb/index. shtml
5. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT: Final report Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities, (2007). http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/ smart-cities-final-report.pdf
6. T. Hashitani et al.: Environmental Load Reduction by ICT. Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 95-106 (2009).
7. Fujitsu: Environmental Contribution by Solutions (in Japanese). http://jp.fujitsu.com/solutions/eco/contribution/
8. Y. Nakagami et al.: Environmentally Conscious Product Design through Entire Life Cycle. FUJITSU, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 680-687 (2011) (in Japanese).
9. United Nations Environment Programme: Life Cycle Management, A Business Guide to Sustainability, 2007. http://www.unep.org/pdf/dtie/DTI0889PA.pdf
10. Y. Asami et al.: Environmental Performance Assessment of Municipalities with the " CASBEE-City" Tool. Transactions of AIJ, (September 2010).
11. K. J. Bagstad et al.: Can the Genuine Progress Indicator better inform sustainable regional progress?-A case study for Northeast Ohio. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 18, pp. 330-341 (2012).
12. David Vačkář: Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity: A cross-national comparison. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 16, pp. 40-46 (2012).
13. H. Takayama et al.: Developing More Super Green Products and Achieving Eco-efficiency Factor. Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J., Vol.45, No.1, pp. 62-73 (2009).
14. Fujitsu: Environmental Consciousness of Products (in Japanese). http://jp.fujitsu.com/about/csr/eco/products/gproducts/
15. M. Kutami: A method for the assessment of corporate activities' impact on and contribution to biodiversity TERI Green Growth and Development Quarterly, Vol.1, Issue 2, pp. 39-45 (January 2013). http://www.teriin.org/pdf/ggd-vol1- Iss2.pdf
16. M. Kutami et al.: New Approach for Environmental Future City Created by ICT: Sustainable City Network. FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 110-111 (2014).