Content and style comparison of physician communication in teledermatology and in-person visits

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 509-514

  Edison, Karen E ^a   Fleming, David A ^a   Nieman, Elizabeth Lewis ^a   Stine, Kendra ^b   Chance, Louanne ^a   Demiris, George ^a,c  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

dermatology; telecommunications; teledermatology; telemedicine

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DERMATOLOGY; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEMEDICINE;

CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS; HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; STYLE AND CONTENTS; TELEDERMATOLOGY; WILCOXON RANK SUM TEST;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; DERMATOLOGY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RECORDING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNICATION; DERMATOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MISSOURI; OFFICE VISITS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TAPE RECORDING; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899772820     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0227     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Demiris G, Edison K, Vijaykumar S. A comparison of communication models of traditional and video-mediated healthcare delivery. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:851-856.
2. Fleming DA. Ethical implications in the use of telehealth and teledermatology. In: Pak H, Edison KE, Whited JD, eds. Teledermatology: A user's guide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2008:97-108.
3. Whited JD. Summary of the status of teledermatology research. Teledermatology Special Interest Group, American Telemedicine Association. June 7, 2010. Available at: www.americantelemed.org/files/public/MemberGroups/ Teledermatology/Teledermatology-Research-2010.pdf (last accessed April 22, 2011).
4. Edison KE, Ward DS, Dyer JA, Lane W, Chance L, Hicks LL. Diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and management concordance in live-interactive and store-andforward teledermatology compared to in-person examination. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:889-895.
5. Ball CJ, McLaren PM, Summerfield AB, Lipsedge MS, Watson JP. A comparison of communication modes in adult psychiatry. J Telemed Telecare 1995;1:22-26.
6. Liu X, Sawada Y, Takizawa T, et al. Doctor-patient communication: A comparison between telemedicine consultation and face-to-face consultation. Intern Med 2007;46:227-232.
7. Fleming DA, Riley SL, Boren S, Hoffman KG, Edison KE, Brooks CS. Incorporating telehealth into primary care resident outpatient training. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:277-282.
8. Onor ML, Misan S. The clinical interview and the doctor-patient relationship in telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:102-105.
9. Missouri Telehealth Network. Missouri Telehealth Network overview. 2010. Available at http://telehealth.muhealth.org/about%20mtn/about-projects.html (last accessed April 26, 2011).
10. Demiris G, Speedie SS, Finkelstein SM. The nature of communication in virtual home care visits. Proc AMIA Annu Symp 2001;135-138.
11. Callahan EJ, Bertakis KD. Development and validation of the Davis Observation Code. Fam Med 1991;23:19-24.
12. Jansen J, Butow PN, van Weert JC et al. Does age really matter? Recall of information presented to newly referred patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5450-5457.
13. Edison KE, Chance L, Martin K, Braudis K, Whited JD. Users and nonusers of university-based dermatology services following a teledermatology encounter: A retrospective descriptive analysis. Telemed J E Health 2011;17:14-18.