The Challenges for Scientists in Avoiding Plagiarism

Accountability in Research

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 353-365

  Fisher, E R ^a   Partin, K M ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

education; ethics; RCR instruction; research integrity instruction; Responsible Conduct of Research

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERSONNEL; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; PLAGIARISM; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84899707825     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2013.877348     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. 42 CFR Parts 50 and 93. (2005). Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct. Code of Federal Regulations. Available at http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/42_cfr_parts_50_and_93_2005.pdf Last accessed April 4, 2014.
2. 45 CFR Part 689. (2002). Research Misconduct. Code of Federal Regulations. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/oig/resmisreg.pdf Last accessed April 4, 2014.
3. Anderson, M. S., A. S. Horn, K. R. Risbey, E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. C. Martinson. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82:953-860.
4. Butler, D. (2010). Journals step up plagiarism policing: Cut-and-paste culture tackled by CrossCheck Software. Nature 466:167
5. DuBois, J. M., Anderson, E. E., Chibnall, J., Carroll, K., and Rubbelke, T. (2013). Understanding research misconduct: A comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Accountability in Research, 20:320-328.
6. Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data." PLoS One, e5739.
7. Hopkins, J. D. (2011). PK6 Academic Citation and Documentation, University of Tampere. Available at http://www.uta.fi/FAST/PK6/REF/quikguid.html Last accessed April 4, 2014.
8. Irving, J. (1985). The Cider House Rules. New York: Balentine Publishing Group.
9. Kalichman, M. A. (2013). A brief history of RCR education. Accountability in Research, 20:380-394.
10. Kornfield, D. S. (2012). Resesarch misconduct: The search for a remedy. Academic Medicine, 87:877-882.
11. Li, S. (2010). Journal review process increasingly includes check for plagiarism. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
12. Mitchell, J. A. (2005). Kent plagiarism case study 2005, University of Kent. Available at http://www.kent.ac.uk/english/writingwebsite/workshop/docs/Plagiarism.pdf.
13. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2014a). NSF_Search. Search Case Closeout Memoranda. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/oig/search/ Last accessed April 4, 2014.
14. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2014b). Semiannual Reports. Office of Inspector General. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/oig/semiannuals.jsp Last accessed April 4, 2014.
15. Office of Inspector General (OIG). (2012). March 2012 Semiannual Report. US OIG. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation. Available at http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/journal-review-process-increasingly-includes-check-for-plagiarism/25420 Last accessed April 4, 2014.
16. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). (2002). Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing. Bethesda, MD: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
17. Sun, Z., Errami, M., Long, T., Renard, C., Choradia, N., and Garner, H. (2010). Systematic characterizations of text similarity in full text biomedical publications. PLoS One, 5:1-6.
18. Vasgird, D. R. (2007). Prevention over cure: The administrative rationale for education in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82:835-837.
19. Zhang, H. (2010). CrossCheck: An effective tool for detecting plagiarism. Learned Publishing, 23:9-14.