Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue APR, 2014, Pages

  Troche, Joshua ^a   Crutch, Sebastian ^b   Reilly, Jamie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstract concepts; Concreteness; Embodied cognition; Emotion; Magnitude; Semantic memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899703896     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00360     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Aldenderfer, M. S., and Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
2. Allen, R., and Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. J. Mem. Lang. 55, 64-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.002.
3. Allman, M. J., and Meck, W. H. (2012). Pathophysiological distortions in time perception and timed performance. Brain 135, 656-677. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr210.
4. Altarriba, J., Bauer, L., and Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behav. Res. Methods 31, 578-602. doi: 10.3758/BF03200738.
5. Anderson, R. C., and Nagy, W. E. (1991). "Word meanings," in Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 2, eds R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, and P. D. Pearson (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc), 690-724.
6. Anderson, T. W., and Rubin, H. (1956). "Statistical inference in factor analysis," in Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 5 (London: Cambridge University Press), 111-150.
7. Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., and Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychol. Rev. 116, 463-498. doi: 10.1037/a0016261.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 637-660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147.
9. Barsalou, L. W., and Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). "Situating abstract concepts," in Gounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thought, D. Pecher and R. Zwaan (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 129-163. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007.
10. Bleasdale, F. A. (1987). Concreteness-dependent associative priming: separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 13, 582-594. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.582.
11. Bloom, L. (1998). "Language acquisition in its developmental context," in Handbook of Child Psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, Perception, and Language ed W. Damon (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley&Sons Inc), 309-370.
12. Bonner, M. F., Vesely, L., Price, C., Anderson, C., Richmond, L., Farag, C., et al. (2009). Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 26, 568-579. doi: 10.1080/02643290903512305.
13. Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A., et al. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: a study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Front. Psychol. 2:15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015.
14. Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. M., and Coslett, H. B. (1994). Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11, 617-660. doi: 10.1080/02643299408251987.
15. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., and Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's mechanical turk. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980.
16. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A Hum. Exp. Psychol. 33A, 497-505. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400805.
17. Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. J., and Keating, C. (1988). Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading. Br. J. Psychol. 79, 1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02270.x.
18. Connell, L., and Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition 125, 452-465. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010.
19. Cree, G. S., McNorgan, C., and McRae, K. (2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: implications for theories of semantic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32, 643-658. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.643.
20. Cree, G. S., and McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 163-201. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163.
21. Crutch, S. J., and Jackson, E. C. (2011). Contrasting graded effects of semantic similarity and association across the concreteness spectrum. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 1388-1408. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.543285.
22. Crutch, S. J., Lehmann, M., Schott, J. M., Rabinovici, G. D., Rossor, M. N., and Fox, N. C. (2012a). Posterior cortical atrophy. Lancet Neurol. 11, 170. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70289-7.
23. Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., and Ridgway, G. R. (2013). Abstract conceptual feature ratings: the role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00186.
24. Crutch, S. J., and Warrington, E. K. (2003). Spatial coding of semantic information: knowledge of country and city names depends on their geographical proximity. Brain 126, 1821-1829. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg187.
25. Crutch, S. J., and Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain 128, 615-627. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh349.
26. Crutch, S. J., Williams, P., Ridgway, G. R., and Borgenicht, L. (2012b). The role of polarity in antonym and synonym conceptual knowledge: evidence from stroke aphasia and multidimensional ratings of abstract words. Neuropsychologia 50, 2636-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.015.
27. Danielsson, P.-E. (1980). Euclidean distance mapping. Comput. Graph. Image Process. 14, 227-248. doi: 10.1016/0146-664X(80)90054-4.
28. Dilkina, K., and Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2012). Conceptual structure within and between modalities. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:333. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00333.
29. Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., Afonso, O., Scheepers, C., and Carreiras, M. (2009). Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Cognition 110, 284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.012.
30. Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R., and Hirsch, J. (2006). Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron 51, 871-882. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029.
31. Franklin, S., Howard, D., and Patterson, K. (1994). Abstract word meaning deafness. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11, 1-34. doi: 10.1080/02643299408251964.
32. Franklin, S., Howard, D., and Patterson, K. (1995). Abstract word anomia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12, 549-566. doi: 10.1080/02643299508252007.
33. Gallese, V., and Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 455-479. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000310.
34. Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., and Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 18, 125-174. doi: 10.1080/02643290125857.
35. Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., Pratt, K. H., and Hodges, J. R. (2005). Semantic feature knowledge and picture naming in dementia of Alzheimer's type: a new approach. Brain Lang. 93, 79-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.003.
36. Gathercole, V. C. (1985). "He has too much hard questions:" the acquisition of the linguistic mass-count distinction in much and many. J. Child Lang. 12, 395-415. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900006504.
37. Gibb, W., Luthert, P., and Marsden, C. (1989). Corticobasal degeneration. Brain 112, 1171-1192. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.5.1171.
38. Gilhooly, K., and Logie, R. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behav. Res. Methods 12, 395-427. doi: 10.3758/BF03201693.
39. Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., Jones, R. W., and Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic dementia. Neuropsychology 23, 492-499. doi: 10.1037/a0015452.
40. Jones, G. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication. Brain Lang. 24, 1-19. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(85)90094-X.
41. Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., and Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 140, 14-34. doi: 10.1037/a0021446.
42. Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., and Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition 112, 473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007.
43. Kroll, J. F., and Merves, J. S. (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 12, 92-107. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.92.
44. Lakoff, G. (1990). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4, 773-785. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x.
46. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.
47. Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 104, 211. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211.
48. Locke, J. (1685). "An essay on human understanding," in Of Abstract and Concrete Terms, Chapter 7, ed M. Ruse (New York, NY; Amherst, MA: Prometheus books), 384-385.
49. Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., and Grafman, J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 799-809. doi: 10.1038/nrn1768.
50. Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., and Pexman, P. M. (2012). Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275.
51. Osgood, C. E., Sebeok, T. A., Gardner, J. W., Carroll, J. B., Newmark, L. D., Ervin, S. M., et al. (1954). Psycholinguistics: a survey of theory and research problems. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 49(4 pt 2), i. doi: 10.1037/h0063655.
52. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Can. J. Psychol. 45, 255-287. doi: 10.1037/h0084295.
53. Paivio, A. (2013). Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: a critical review of Kousta et al. (2011). J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 282-287. doi: 10.1037/a0027004.
54. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., and Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. J. Exp. Psychol. 76(1 pt 2), 1-25. doi: 10.1037/h0025327.
55. Plaut, D. C., and Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 10, 377-500. doi: 10.1080/02643299308253469.
56. Reilly, J. (2005). A tale of two imageabilities: An interaction of sound and meaning in natural language perception. (66), Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, US. Available online at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2005-99024-143&site=ehost-live.
57. Reilly, J., Chrysikou, E. G., and Ramey, C. H. (2007). Support for hybrid models of the age of acquisition of English nouns. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 1164-1170. doi: 10.3758/BF03193107.
58. Reilly, J., and Kean, J. (2007). Formal distinctiveness of high-and low-imageability nouns: analyses and theoretical implications. Cogn. Sci. 31, 157-168. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336988.
59. Reilly, J., Westbury, C., Kean, J., and Peelle, J. E. (2012). Arbitrary symbolism in natural language revisited: when word forms carry meaning. PLoS ONE 7:e42286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042286.
60. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., et al. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychol. Rev. 111, 205-235. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205.
61. Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 4, 328-350. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0.
62. Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Read. Writing Q. 21, 221-238. doi: 10.1080/10573560590949359.
63. Sadoski, M., and Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. Theor. Models Processes Read. 5, 1329-1362. doi: 10.1598/0872075028.47.
64. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., and Luh, W.-M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Mem. Cognit. 20, 96-104. doi: 10.3758/BF03208259.
65. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., and Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. J. Mem. Lang. 27, 499-520. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8.
66. Schwanenflugel, P. J., and Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 9, 82-102. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82.
67. Strain, E., Patterson, K., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 207-214. discussion: 215-220. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.207.
68. Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S.-T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., et al. (2013). The neural representation of abstract words: the role of emotion. Cereb. Cortex. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht025. [Epub ahead of print].
69. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., and Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cogn. Psychol. 48, 422-488. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001.
70. Walker, I., and Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25, 1256-1271. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1256.
71. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002.
72. Ward, J. H. Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236-244. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845.
73. Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 27, 635-657. doi: 10.1080/14640747508400525.
74. Warrington, E. K. (1981). Concrete word dyslexia. Br. J. Psychol. 72, 175-196. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1981.tb02175.x.
75. Westbury, C., and Moroschan, G. (2009). Imageability x phonology interactions during lexical access: effects of modality, phonological neighbourhood, and phonological processing efficiency. Ment. Lex. 4, 115-145. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.1.05wes.
76. Wiemer-Hastings, K., and Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cogn. Sci. 29, 719-736. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33.
77. Zwaan, R. A., and Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135, 1-11. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1.
78. Zwaan, R. A., and Yaxley, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 10, 954-958. doi: 10.3758/BF03196557.