Community TAsScale high-touch learning, provide student-staff brokering, and build esprit de corps

L@S 2014 - Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Learning at Scale

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 163-164

  Papadopoulos, Kathryn ^a   Sritanyaratana, Lalida ^a   Klemmer, Scott R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community TAs; Teaching assistants; Volunteer teaching

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS;

COMMUNITY TAS; DISCUSSION FORUM; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION (HCI); ONLINE COURSE; PEER ASSESSMENT; TEACHING ASSISTANTS; TEACHING STAFF; TIME OF DAY;

TEACHING;

EID: 84899703784     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2556325.2567860     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Brinton, C.G. et al. Learning about social learning in MOOCS: From statistical analysis to generative model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.2159 (2013).
2. Burt, R.S. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110, 2 (2004), 349-399.
3. Fox, A. and Patterson, D. What We've Learned from Teaching MOOCs. https://www.edx.org/blog/what-weve-learned-teaching-moocs.
4. Goldschmid, B. and Goldschmid, M.L. Peer teaching in higher education: a review. Higher Education 5, 1 (1976).
5. Roberts, E., Lilly, J. and Rollins, B. Using undergraduates as teaching assistants in introductory programming courses: An update on the Stanford experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 27, 1 (1995), 48-52.
6. Wild, T. C., and Enzle., M. E., and Hawkins, W. L. Effects of perceived extrinsic versus intrinsic teacher motivation on student reactions to skill acquisition. Personality and social psychology bulletin 18, 2 (1992), 245-251.