Use of porous space maintainers in staged mandibular reconstruction

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 143-149

  Henslee, Allan M ^a   Spicer, Patrick P ^a   Shah, Sarita R ^a   Tatara, Alexander M ^a   Kasper, F Kurtis ^a   Mikos, Antonios G ^a   Wong, Mark E ^b  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Implant fabrication; Mandibular reconstruction; Polymethylmethacrylate space maintainer

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CASE REPORT; DEVICES; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MANDIBULAR NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBULAR NEOPLASMS; MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 84899703321     PISSN: 10423699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2014.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Rodriguez E., Martin M., Bluebond-Langner R., et al. Multiplanar distraction osteogenesis of fibula free flaps used for secondary reconstruction of traumatic maxillary defects. JCraniofac Surg 2006, 17(5):883-888.
2. Posnick J.C., Wells M., Zuker R. Use of the free fibular flap in the immediate reconstruction of pediatric mandibular tumors: report of cases. JOral Maxillofac Surg 1993, 51(2):189-196.
3. Gadre P., Ramanojam S., Patankar A., et al. Nonvascularized bone grafting for mandibular reconstruction: myth or reality?. JCraniofac Surg 2011, 22(5):1727-1735.
4. van Gemert J.T., van Es R.J., Van Cann E.M., et al. Nonvascularized bone grafts for segmental reconstruction of the mandible-a reappraisal. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67(7):1446-1452.
5. Goodger N.M., Wang J., Smagalski G.W., et al. Methylmethacrylate as a space maintainer in mandibular reconstruction. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2005, 63(7):1048-1051.
6. Govila A. Use of methyl methacrylate in bone reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1990, 43(2):210-216.
7. Benoist M. Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction. JMaxillofac Surg 1978, 6(1):40-49.
8. Filho R.C., Oliveira T.M., Neto N.L., et al. Reconstruction of bony facial contour deficiencies with polymethylmethacrylate implants: case report. JAppl Oral Sci 2011, 19(4):426-430.
9. Wright S., Bekiroglu F., Whear N.M., et al. Use of Palacos R-40 with gentamicin to reconstruct temporal defects after maxillofacial reconstructions with temporalis flaps. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006, 44(6):531-533.
10. Spetzger U., Vougioukas V., Schipper J. Materials and techniques for osseous skull reconstruction. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2010, 19(2):110-121.
11. Lu J.X., Huang Z.W., Tropiano P. Human biological reactions at the interface between bone tissue and polymethylmethacrylate cement. JMater Sci Mater Med 2002, 13(8):803-809.
12. O'Dowd-Booth C., White J., Smitham P., et al. Bone cement: perioperative issues, orthopaedic applications and future developments. JPerioper Pract 2011, 21(9):304-308.
13. Hannen E.J. Recreating the original contour in tumor deformed mandibles for plate adapting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006, 35(2):183-185.
14. Cheng H.T., Wu C.I., Tseng C.S., et al. The occlusion-adjusted prefabricated 3D mirror image templatesby computer simulation: the image-guided navigation system application in difficult cases of head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009, 63(5):517-521. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819349b9.
15. Fernandes R., DiPasquale J. Computer-aided surgery using 3D rendering of maxillofacial pathology and trauma. Int J Med Robot 2007, 3(3):203-206.
16. Liu J., Gottfried O., Cole C., et al. Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 2004, 16(3):ECP1.
17. Bruens M.L., Pieterman H., de Wijn J.R., et al. Porous polymethylmethacrylate as bone substitute in the craniofacial area. JCraniofac Surg 2003, 14(1):63-68.
18. van Mullem P., Vaandrager J.M., Nicolai J., et al. Implantation of porous acrylic cement in soft tissues: an animal and human biopsy histological study. Biomaterials 1990, 11(5):299-304.
19. Meyer P., Lautenschlager E., Moore B. On the setting properties of acrylic bone cement. JBone Joint Surg Am 1973, 55(1):149-156.
20. Granchi D., Stea S., Ciapetti G., et al. Invitro effects of bone cements on the cell cycle of osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials 1995, 16(15):1187-1192.
21. Wang L., Yoon D.M., Spicer P.P., et al. Characterization of porous polymethylmethacrylate space maintainers for craniofacial reconstruction. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013, 101B(5):813-825.
22. Van Mullem P., De Wijn J.R., Vaandrager J.M. Porous acrylic cement: evaluation of a novel implant material. Ann Plast Surg 1988, 21(6):576-582.
23. Kretlow J.D., Shi M., Young S., et al. Evaluation of soft tissue coverage over porous polymethylmethacrylate space maintainers within nonhealing alveolar bone defects. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2010, 16(6):1427-1438.
24. Nguyen C., Young S., Kretlow J.D., et al. Surface characteristics of biomaterials used for space maintenance in a mandibular defect: a pilot animal study. JOral Maxillofac Surg 2010, 69(1):11-18.
25. Palacci P., Nowzari H. Soft tissue enhancement around dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2008, 47:113-132.
26. Pogrel M.A., Podlesh S., Anthony J.P., et al. Acomparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. JOral Maxillofac Surg 1997, 55(11):1200-1206.
27. Marx R. Clinical application of bone biology to mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994, 21(3):377-392.