The influence of permeable mineral lenses on peatland hydrology

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 184, Issue , 2009, Pages 289-297

  Reeve, A S ^a   Tyczka, Z D ^a   Comas, X ^b   Slater, L D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899677244     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/2008GM000825     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beckwith, C., A. Baird, and A. Heathwaite (2003), Anisotropy and depth-related heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity in a peat bog. II: Modelling the effect on groundwater flow, Hydrol. Processes, 17, 103-113.
2. Boldt, D. (1986), Computer simulations of groundwater flow in a raised bog system, Glacial Lake Agassiz peatlands, northern Minnesota, Master's thesis, Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, N. Y.
3. Bradley, C. (2002), Simulation of the annual water table dynamics of a floodplain wetland, Narborough Bog, UK, J. Hydrol., 261, 150-172.
4. Cole, S. (1992), Supplemental hydrogeologic investigation, Orono Municipal Landfill, Tech. Rep., S.W. Cole Eng., Inc. Bangor, Maine.
5. Comas, X., L. Slater, and A. Reeve (2004), Geophysical evidence for peat basin morphology and stratigraphic controls on vegetation observed in a northern peatland, J. Hydrol., 295, 173-184.
6. Comas, X., L. Slater, and A. Reeve (2005a), Stratigraphic controls on pool formation in a domed bog inferred from ground penetrating radar (gpr), J. Hydrol., 40-51.
7. Comas, X., L. Slater, and A. Reeve (2005b), Geophysical and hydrological evaluation of two bog complexes in a northern peatland: Implications for the distribution of biogenic gases at the basin scale, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 19, GB4023, doi:10.1029/2005GB002582.
8. Comas, X., L. Slater, and A. Reeve (2007), In situ monitoring of free-phase gas accumulation and release in peatlands using ground penetrating radar (GPR), Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06402, doi:10.1029/2006GL029014.
9. Davis, R., and D. Anderson (1999), A numeric method and supporting database for evaluation of Maine peatlands as candidate natural areas, Tech. Rep. 175, Maine Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Orono, Maine.
10. Devito, K., J. Waddington, and B. Branfireun (1997), Flow reversals in peatlands influenced by local groundwater systems, Hydrol. Processes, 11, 103-110.
11. Doherty, J. (2001), Improved calculations for dewatered cells in MODFLOW, Ground Water, 39, 863-869.
12. Drexler, J., and B. Bedford (2002), Pathways of nutrient loading and impacts on plant diversity in a New York peatland, Wetlands, 2, 263-281.
13. Freeze, R. A., and P. A. Witherspoon (1967), Theoretical analysis of regional groundwater flow: 2. Effect of water-table configuration and subsurface permeability variation, Water Resour. Res., 3, 623-635.
14. Glaser, P., D. Siegel, E. Romanowicz, and Y. Shen (1997), Regional linkages between raised bogs and the climate, groundwater, and landscape of north-western Minnesota, J. Ecol., 85, 3-16.
15. Glaser, P., D. Siegel, A. Reeve, J. Janssens, and D. Janecky (2004), Tectonic drivers for vegetation patterning and landscape evolution in the Albany River region of the Hudson Bay Lowlands, J. Ecol., 1054-1070.
16. Hemond, H., and J. Goldman (1985), On non-Darcian water flow in peat, J. Ecol., 73, 579-584.
17. Ingram, H. (1982), Size and shape in raised mire ecosystems: A geophysical model, Nature, 297, 300-303.
18. Kellner, E., J. Waddington, and J. Price (2005), Dynamics of biogenic gas bubbles in peat: Potential effects on water storage and peat deformation, Water Resour. Res., 41, WO8417, doi:10.1029/2004WR003732.
19. Lapen, D., J. Price, and R. Gilbert (2005), Modelling two-dimensional steady-state groundwater flow and flow sensitivity to boundary conditions in blanket peat complexes, Hydrol. Processes, 19, 371-386.
20. Price, J., and S. Schlotzhauer (1999), Importance of shrinkage and compression in determining water storage changes in peat: the case of a mined peatland, Hydrol. Processes, 13, 2591-2601.
21. Reeve, A., D. Siegel, and P. Glaser (2000), Simulating vertical flow in large peatlands, J. Hydrol., 227, 207-217.
22. Reeve, A., D. Siegel, and P. Glaser (2001a), Simulating dispersive mixing in large peatlands, J. Hydrol., 242, 103-114.
23. Reeve, A., J. Warzocha, P. Glaser, and D. Siegel (2001b), Regional ground-water flow modeling of the Glacial Lake Agassiz Peatlands, Minnesota, J. Hydrol., 243, 91-100.
24. Reeve, A. S., R. Evensen, P. Glaser, D. Siegel, and D. Rosenberry (2006), Flow path oscillations in transient ground-water simulations of large peatland systems, J. Hydrol., 316, 313-324.
25. Romanowicz, E. A., D. I. Siegel, J. P. Chanton, and P. H. Glaser (1995), Temporal variations in dissolved methane deep in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands, Minnesota, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 9(2), 197-212.
26. Rosenberry, D., P. Glaser, and D. Siegel (2006), The hydrology of northern peatlands as affected by biogenic gas: Current developments and research needs, Hydrol. Processes, 20, 3601-3610.
27. Siegel, D. (1992), Groundwater hydrology, in The Patterned Peatlands of Minnesota, edited by J. H. E. Wright, B. A. Coffin, and N. E. Aaseng, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn.
28. Siegel, D., and P. Glaser (1987), Groundwater flow in a bog-fen complex, Lost River Peatland, northern Minnesota, J. Ecol., 75, 743-754.
29. Stevens, N. (2006), Characterizing solute transport processes through laboratory experiments and numerical simulation, Master's thesis, Univ. of Maine, Orono.
30. Wheeler, D., J. Guyer, and J. Warren (2007), Fipy user's guide, Tech. Rep. version 1.2, Nat. Inst. of Stand. and Tech., Gaithersburg, Md.
31. Winston, R. (1994), Models of the geomorphology, hydrology, and development of domed peat bodies, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 106, 1594-1604.
32. Winter, T. C. (1976), Numerical simulation analysis of the interaction of lakes and ground water, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1001.