Upgrading the old vernacular building to contemporary norms: Multiple criteria approach

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 291-298

  Šiožinyte, Egle ^a   Antuchevičiene, Jurgita ^a   Kutut, Vladislavas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

AHP; MCDM; modernisation; sustainable development; TOPSIS Grey; upgrading; vernacular architecture; vernacular building

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MODERNIZATION; PLANNING; RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AHP; MCDM; TOPSIS GREY; UPGRADING; VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE; VERNACULAR BUILDINGS;

ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84899670816     PISSN: 13923730     EISSN: 18223605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2014.904814     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Binici, H.; Eken, M.; Dolaz, M.; Aksogan, O.; Kara, M. 2014. An environmentally friendly thermal insulation materials from sunflower stalk, textile waist and stubble fibres, Construction and Building Materials 51: 24-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.038
2. Cano, M.; Garzón, E.; Sánchez-Soto, P. J. 2013. Preservation and conservation of rural buildings as a subject of cultural tourism: a review concerning the application of new technologies and methodologies, Journal of Tourism & hHtotps:p//idtaxl.idtyo i2.o(2rg):/1101.54.1 72/2167-0269.1000115
3. Foruzanmehr, A.; Vellinga, M. 2011.Vernacular architecture: questions of comfort and practicability, Building Research & Information 39(3): 274-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.562368
4. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Sedaghat, M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2012. Performance evaluating of rural ICT centers (telecenters), applying Fuzzy AHP, SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey, a case study in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(2): 364-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.685110
5. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Antucheviciene, J. 2012. Team member selecting based on AHP and TOPSIS Grey, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 23(4): 425-434.
6. Hoof, J.; Dijken, F. 2008. The historical turf farms of Iceland: architecture, building technology and the indoor environment , Building and Environment 43(6): 1023-1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.03.004
7. Itani, T.; Ghddar, N.; Ghali, K. 2013. Strategies for reducing energy consumption in existing office buildings, International Journal of Sustainable Energy 32(4): 259-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2011.622765
8. Kaplinski, O.; Tupenaite, L. 2011. Review of the multiple criteria decision making methods, intelligent and biometric systems applied in modern construction economics, Transformations in Business & Economics 10(1): 166-181.
9. Kazanasmaz, T.; Uygun, I. E.; Akkurt, G. G.; Turhan, C.; Ekmen , K. E. 2014. On the relation between architectural considerations and heating energy performance of Turkish residential buildings in Izmir, Energy and Buildings 72: 38-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.036
10. Keizikas, A.; AndriušytJ, A.; ŠiožinytJ, E. 2012. Research of some aspects of relation between ecology and energy efficiency in traditional architecture, Evolution of Science and Technology 4(1): 47-61 (in Lithuanian). http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/est2011.04
11. Lin, Y.-H.; Lee, P.-C.; Chang, T.-P.; Ting, H.-I. 2008. Multiattribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information, Automation in Construction 17(6): 792-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon. 2008.02.011
12. Ourghi, R.; AlAnzi, A.; Krarti, M. 2007. A simplified analysis method to predict the impact of shape on annual energy use for office buildings, Energy Conversion and Management 48(1): 300-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman. 2006.04.011
13. Pajchrowski, G.; Noskowiak, A.; Lewandowska, A.; Strykowski , W. 2014. Materials composition or energy characteristic-what is more important in environmental life cycle of buildings, Building and Environment 72: 15-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.10.012
14. Parasonis, J.; Keizikas, A.; KalibatienJ, D. 2012. The relationship between the shape of a building and its energy performance , Architectural Engineering and Design Management 8(4): 246-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 17452007.2012.675139
15. Porto, S. M. C.; Cascone, G. 2013. A building characterizationbased method for the advancement of knowledge on external architectural features of traditional rural buildings , Informes de la Construcción 65(532): 481-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.12.086
16. Russo, P.; Riguccio, L.; Carullo, L.; Tomaselli, G. 2013. Using the Analytic Hierarchical Process to define choices for reusing rural buildings: application to an abandoned village in Sicily, Natural Resources 4: 323-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/nr.2013.44039
17. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill. 287 p.
18. Staniunas, M.; MedineckienJ, M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kalibatas , D. 2013. To modernize or not: ecological-economical assessment of multi-dwelling houses modernization, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 13(1): 88-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2012.11.003 STR 2.02.01:2004.
19. Technical Construction Regulation "Residential Buildings". Republic of Lithuania, 2004 (in Lithuanian). STR 2.05.01:2005. Technical Construction Regulation "Thermal Technologies of Partitions of a Building". Republic of Lithuania, 2005 (in Lithuanian).
20. Šešelgis, K.; Baršauskas, J.; CerbulJnas, K.; Kleinas, M. 1965. Vernacular architecture of Lithuania: rural places and buildings. Vol. 1. Kaunas. 151 p. (in Lithuanian).
21. ŠiožinytJ, E.; AntuchevicienJ, J. 2013. Solving the problems of daylighting and tradition continuity in a reconstructed vernacular building, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(6): 873-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.851113
22. Yüksek, I.; Esin, T. 2013. Analysis of traditional rural houses in Turkey in terms of energy efficiency, International Journal of Sustainable Energy 32(6): 643-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2013.769989
23. Volvaciovas, R.; Turskis, Z.; Ignatavicius, C.; Ustinovicius, L.; Ruzgys, A. 2013a. Considering the issue of renovating public buildings with reference to in-kind investigations into wall heat transfer coefficients, Engineering Structures and Technologies 5(2): 82-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/2029882X. 2013.811783
24. Volvaciovas, R.; Turskis, Z.; Aviža, D.; MikštienJ, R. 2013b. Multi-attribute selection of public building retrofits strategy , Procedia Engineering 57: 1236-1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04. 156
25. Wang, W.-C.; Yu, W.; Yang, I.-T.; Lin, C.-C.; Lee, M.-T.; Cheng, Y.-Y. 2013. Applying the AHP to support the best-value contractor selection-lessons learned from two case studies in Taiwan, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(1): 24-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.734851
26. Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J. 2007. Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building's regeneration alternatives, Building and Environment 42(1): 436-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001
27. Zavadskas, E. K.; Vilutiene, T.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2010. Contractor selection for construction works by applying SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey techniques, Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(1): 34-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.03
28. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 397-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291