The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities III's Cognitive Performance Model: Empirical Support for Intermediate Factors Within CHC Theory

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 187-201

  Taub, Gordon E ^a   McGrew, Kevin S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c Woodcock Muñoz Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; Carroll; CHC; CPM; intelligence; Woodcock Johnson

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899656653     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734282913504808     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ackerman P. L.,Heggestad E. D.Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits.Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121:219-245.
2. Arbuckle J. L.,Wothke W.AMOS users guide version 4.0. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters; 2004:.
3. Carroll J. B.Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1993:.
4. Carroll J. B.Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Flanagan D. P.Genshaft J. L.Harrison P. L., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 1997:122-130.
5. Cizek G. J.The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Plake B. S.Impara J. C.Spies R. A., ed. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements; 2003:1020-1024.
6. Conway C.,Pisoni D.,Kronenberger W.The importance of sound for cognitive sequencing abilities: The auditory scaffolding hypothesis.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009;18:275-279.
7. Elliott C. D.Differential Ability Scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1990:.
8. Fan X.,Sivo S.Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007;42:509-529.
9. Floyd F. J.,Widaman K. F.Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.Psychological Assessment. 1995;7:286-299.
10. HornJ. L. (1965). Fluid and crystallized intelligence: A factor analytic and developmental study of the structure among primary mental abilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana.
11. Horn J. L.The encyclopedia of intelligence. Sternberg R. J., ed. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1994:443-451.
12. Jerger J.,Musiek F.On the diagnosis of auditory processing disorder: A reply to Clinical and research concerns regarding Jerger & Musiek (2000) APD recommendations.Audiology Today. 2002;14 (2): 19-21.
13. Keith T. Z.Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Flanagan D. P.Genshaft J. L.Harrison P. L., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 1997:373-402.
14. Keith T. Z.Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Flanagan D. P.Genshaft J. L.Harrison P. L., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2005:581-614.
15. Keith T. Z.,Reynolds M. R.Cattell-horn-carroll abilities and cognitive tests: What we've learned from 20 years of research.Psychology in the Schools. 2010;47:635-650.
16. Kline R. B.Principles and practice of structural modeling. New York, NY: Guilford; 2005:.
17. McGrew K. S.Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Flanagan D. P.Genshaft J. L.Harrison P. L., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2005:136-182.
18. McGrew K. S.CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research.Intelligence. 2009;37:1-10.
19. McGrew K. S.,Woodcock R. W.Technical manual. Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside; 2001:.
20. Meade A. W.,Johnson E. C.,Braddy P. W.Power and sensitivity of alternative indices in tests of measurement invariance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008;93:568-592.
21. Miles J.,Shevlin M.A time and place for incremental fit indices.Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;42:869-874.
22. Naglieri J. A.,Das J. P.Cognitive assessment system. Itasca, IL: Riverside; 1997:.
23. Sandoval J.The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Plake B. S.Impara J. C.Spies R. A., ed. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements; 2003:1024-1028.
24. Schafer J. L.,Graham J. W.Missing data: Our view of the state of the art.Psychological Methods. 2002;7:147-177.
25. Schneider W. J.,McGrew K. S.Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. 2012). The cattell-horn-carroll model of intelligence. In FlanaganD.HarrisonP. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99-144). New York, NY: Guilford.Flanagan D.Harrison P., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2012:99-144.
26. Stankov L.The theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence-New findings and recent developments.Learning and Individual Differences. 2000;12:1-3.
27. Taub G. E.,McGrew K. S.A confirmatory factor analysis of CHC theory and cross-age invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of cognitive abilities III.School Psychology Quarterly. 2004;19:72-87.
28. Thorndike R. L.,Hagen E. P.,Sattler J. S.Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. 1986). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Itasca, IL. Riverside.Itasca, IL: Riverside; 1986:.
29. Woodcock R. W.Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Flanagan D. P.Genshaft J. L.Harrison P. L., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 1997:373-402.
30. Woodcock R. W.,Johnson M. B.Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-Revised. Chicago, IL: Riverside; 1989:.
31. Woodcock R. W.,McGrew K. S.,Mather N.Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca,IL: Riverside; 2001:.
32. Woodcock R. W.,McGrew K. S.,Mather N.,Schrank F. A.Woodcock-Johnson III diagnostic supplement to the tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside; 2003:.