Flow diversion versus traditional aneurysm embolization strategies: Analysis of fluoroscopy and procedure times

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 291-295

  Chalouhi, Nohra ^a   McMahon, Jeffrey F ^a   Moukarzel, Lea A ^a   Starke, Robert M ^a   Jabbour, Pascal ^a   Dumont, Aaron S ^a   Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula ^a   Gingold, Eric L ^b   Rosenwasser, Robert ^a   Gonzalez, L Fernando ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTERIAL STENT; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM RUPTURE; CATHETER SHEATH; COHORT ANALYSIS; COIL EMBOLIZATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROCATHETER; ONYX HD 500; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STENT ASSISTED COILING; TIME; UNRUPTURED INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; VERY ELDERLY; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899649061     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010777     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, et al. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346-52. (Pubitemid 47457579)
2. Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, et al. Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032-8.
3. D'Urso PI, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, et al. Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review. Stroke 2011;42:2363-8.
4. Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Tjoumakaris S, et al. Treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: cost comparison of flow diversion and traditional embolization strategies. World Neurosurg Published Online First: 6 Mar 2013. pii: S1878-8750(13)00399-9.
5. Chitale R, Gonzalez LF, Randazzo C, et al. Single center experience with pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications. Neurosurgery 2012;71:679-91.
6. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632-42.
7. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, et al. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34-40.
8. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139-47.
9. Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436-46.
10. Lanzino G, Crobeddu E, Cloft HJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of flow diversion for paraclinoid aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis compared with standard endovascular approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2158-61.
11. Chitale R, Gonzalez LF, Randazzo C, et al. Single center experience with pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications. Neurosurgery 2012;71:679-91.
12. Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Dumont AS, et al. Treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery Published Online First: 12 Feb 2013. PMID: 23407289.
13. Chalouhi N, Chitale R, Starke RM, et al. Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6: 19-23.
14. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442-7.
15. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, van der Laak C. Flow diverters for unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms: dangerous and not yet an alternative for conventional endovascular techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:3-4.
16. Jabbour P, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, et al. The pipeline embolization device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery Published Online First: 14 May 2013 doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000429844.06955.39
17. Dalyai RT, Randazzo C, Ghobrial G, et al. Redefining onyx HD 500 in the flow diversion era. Int J Vasc Med 2012;2012:435490. doi: 10.1155/2012/435490
18. Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Singhal S, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348-53.
19. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1999.
20. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267-74. (Pubitemid 35284616)
21. Crobeddu E, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, et al. Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 2: managing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:481-5.
22. Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Gonzalez LF, et al. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms by coiling with and without stent assistance: a review of 235 cases. Neurosurgery 2012;71:785-94.
23. Chalouhi N, Dumont AS, Hasan D, et al. Is packing density important in stent-assisted coiling? Neurosurgery 2012;71:381-6.
24. Struelens L, Vanhavere F, Bosmans H, et al. Skin dose measurements on patients for diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology: a multicentre study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:143-6. (Pubitemid 40883669)
25. Geise RA, O'Dea TJ. Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Appl Radiat Isot 1999;50:173-84. (Pubitemid 29048999)
26. Peterson EC, Kanal KM, Dickinson RL, et al. Radiation-induced complications in endovascular neurosurgery: incidence of skin effects and the feasibility of estimating risk of future tumor formation. Neurosurgery 2012;72:566-72.
27. Vanzin JR, Abud DG, Rezende MT, et al. Number of coils necessary to treat cerebral aneurysms according to each size group: a study based on a series of 952 embolized aneurysms. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2012;70:520-3.
28. Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, et al. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369-82.
29. Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device - a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893-901.
30. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology Published Online First: 15 Feb 2013. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120099
31. Naggara ON, Lecler A, Oppenheim C, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature on safety with emphasis on subgroup analyses. Radiology 2012;263:828-35.
32. O'Kelly CJ, Spears J, Chow M, et al. Canadian experience with the pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:381-7.
33. Kan P, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, et al. Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2012;71:1080-7.
34. Chida K, Saito H, Otani H, et al. Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:774-8. (Pubitemid 46100261)
35. Larrazet F, Dibie A, Philippe F, et al. Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Br J Radiol 2003;76:473-7. (Pubitemid 36903362)
36. Lekovic GP, Kim LJ, Gonzalez LF, et al. Radiation exposure during endovascular procedures. Neurosurgery 2008;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS81-5.
37. Velat GJ, Reavey-Cantwell JF, Sistrom C, et al. Comparison of N-butyl cyanoacrylate and onyx for the embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: analysis of fluoroscopy and procedure times. Neurosurgery 2008;63(1 Suppl 1): ONS73-8.