Mercury cycling in agricultural and managed wetlands, Yolo Bypass, California: Spatial and seasonal variations in water quality

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 484, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 276-287

  Alpers, Charles N ^a   Fleck, Jacob A ^a   Marvin DiPasquale, Mark ^b   Stricker, Craig A ^c   Stephenson, Mark ^d   Taylor, Howard E ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^c DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Iron reduction; Manganese; Methylmercury; Rice agriculture; Sulfate reduction; Wild rice

Indexed keywords

ALKYLATION; CULTIVATION; FLOODS; MANGANESE; MANGANESE REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); MERCURY (METAL); METHYLATION; REDUCTION; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; SURFACE WATERS; WATER QUALITY;

IRON-REDUCTION; METHYL MERCURY; MICROBIAL REDUCTION; SEASONAL VARIATION; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIA; SULFATE REDUCTION; WILD RICE;

WETLANDS;

DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER; MANGANESE; MERCURY; METHYLMERCURY; ORGANIC CARBON; SULFATE; SURFACE WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER POLLUTANT;

AGRICULTURE; GEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; MANGANESE; MERCURY (ELEMENT); METHYLMERCURY; PADDY FIELD; SEASONAL VARIATION; SPATIAL VARIATION; SURFACE WATER; WATER QUALITY; WETLAND;

AGRICULTURAL WETLAND; ARTICLE; BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; FLOODING; HARVEST; MANAGED WETLAND; MERCURY CYCLING; METHYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RICE; RICE FIELD; SEASONAL VARIATION; SEDIMENT; SOIL AMENDMENT; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIUM; SUMMER; SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; UNITED STATES; WATER QUALITY; WATER SAMPLING; WETLAND; WINTER; AGRICULTURE; ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; WATER POLLUTANT;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES; YOLO BYPASS;

AVES; ZIZANIA;

AGRICULTURE; CALIFORNIA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MERCURY; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WETLANDS;

EID: 84899648758     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.096     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ackerman J.T., Eagles-Smith C.A. Agricultural wetlands as potential hotspots for bioaccumulation: experimental evidence using caged fish. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:1451-1457.
2. Ackerman J.T., Takekawa J.Y., Eagles-Smith C.A., Iverson S.A. Mercury contamination and effects on survival of American avocet and black-necked stilt chicks in San Francisco Bay. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:103-116.
3. Ackerman J.T., Miles A.K., Eagles-Smith C.A. Invertebrate mercury bioaccumulation in permanent, seasonal, and flooded rice wetlands within California's Central Valley. Sci Total Environ 2010, 408:666-671.
4. Alpers C.N., Hunerlach M.P., May J.T., Hothem R.L. Mercury contamination from historical gold mining in California. U S Geol Surv Fact Sheet 2005, 3014:1-6. [http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/fs/2005/3014/].
5. Alpers C.N., Stewart A.R., Saiki M.K., Marvin-DiPasquale M.C., Topping B.R., Rider K.M., et al. Environmental factors affecting mercury in Camp Far West Reservoir, 2001-03. U S Geol Surv Sci Investig Rpt 2008, 2006-5008. [358 pp.].
6. Bachand P.A.M., Bachand S., Fleck J.A., Anderson F., Windham-Myers L. Hydrologic modeling for quantifying aqueous fluxes in shallow seasonal wetlands: why internal flowpaths are critical to understanding temporal mercury cycling 2013, [in this issue-a].
7. Bachand P.A.M., Fleck J.A., Bachand S., Anderson F., Stephenson M., Alpers C.N. Methylmercury production and export from agricultural wetlands (rotational rice) in California. USA: revelations from hydrologic analyses 2013, [in this issue-b].
8. Balogh S.J., Nollet Y.H., Swain E.B. Redox chemistry in Minnesota streams during episodes of increased methylmercury discharge. Environ Sci Tech 2004, 38:4921-4927.
9. Balogh S.J., Swain E.B., Nollet Y.H. Characteristics of mercury speciation in Minnesota rivers and stream. Environ Pollut 2008, 154:3-11.
10. Benoit J.M., Gilmour C.C., Mason R.P. The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35:127-132.
11. Bergamaschi B.A., Fleck J.A., Downing B.D., Boss E., Pellerin B., Ganju N.K., et al. Methyl mercury dynamics in a tidal wetland quantified using in situ optical measurements. Limnol Oceanogr 2011, 56:1355-1371.
12. Bradley P.M., Burns D.A., Riva-Murray K., Brigham M.E., Button D.T., Chasar L.C., et al. Spatial and seasonal variability of dissolved methylmercury in two stream basins in the eastern United States. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:2048-2055.
13. Brigham M.E., Wentz D.A., Aiken G.R., Krabbenhoft D.P. Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 1. Water column chemistry and transport. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:2720-2725.
14. California Rice Commission California rice's growing region [accessed July 21, 2012]. http://www.calrice.org/Industry+Info/About+California+Rice/California+Rice+Growing+Region.htm.
15. California Wild Rice Advisory Board Facts about California wild rice [accessed Sept. 30, 2013]. http://cawildrice.com/wild-rice-facts.php.
16. Carmody R.W., Plummer L.N., Busenberg E., Coplen T.P. Methods for collection of dissolved sulfate and sulfide and analysis of their sulfur isotopic composition. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-234 1998, [91 pp.].
17. Central Valley Joint Venture Central Valley Joint Venture implementation plan - conserving bird habitat 2006, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, CA, [http://www.centralvalleyjointventure.org/assets/pdf/CVJV_fnl.pdf (accessed July 21, 2012)].
18. Clark I., Fritz P. Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology 1997, Lewis Publishers, New York, [328 pp.].
19. Coleman M.L., Shepherd T.J., Durham J.J., Rouse J.E., Moore G.R. Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis. Anal Chem 1982, 54(6):993-995. 10.1021/ac00243a035.
20. Compeau G., Bartha R. Methylation and demethylation of mercury under controlled redox, pH, and salinity conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984, 50:498-502.
21. Craig H. Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 1961, 133:1702-1703.
22. Davis J.A., Yee D., Collins J.N., Schwarzbach S.E., Louma S.N., Davis J.A., et al. Potential for increased mercury accumulation in the estuary food web. San Francisco estuary and watershed science 2003, 1(1). [art 4 http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol1/iss1/art4 (accessed Sept. 30., 2010)]. L.R. Brown (Ed.).
23. Domagalski J.L., Alpers C.N., Slotton D.G., Suchanek T.H., Ayers S.M. Mercury and methylmercury concentrations and loads in the Cache Creek Watershed, California. Sci Total Environ 2004, 327:215-237.
24. Drever J.I. The geochemistry of natural waters: surface and groundwater environments 1997, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, [436 pp.]. 3rd ed.
25. Elphick C.S. Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetland habitats. Conserv Biol 2000, 14:1-13.
26. 18O content of waters from natural sources. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1953, 4:213-224.
27. Fitzgerald W.F., Lamborg C.H. Geochemistry of mercury in the environment. Treatise of Geochemistry 2007, 9.04:1-47. Elsevier Ltd.
28. Fleck J.A., Gill G., Downing B.D., Bergamaschi B.A., Alpers C.N. Concurrent photodegradation of dissolved organic matter and methylmercury and its effect on their relationship in natural waters 2013, [in this issue].
29. Fleming E.J., Mack E.E., Green P.G., Nelson D.C. Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72:457-464.
30. Fry B., Chumchal M.M. Mercury bioaccumulation in estuarine food webs. Ecol Appl 2012, 22:606-623.
31. Gagnon C.E., Pelletier A., Mucci A., Fitzgerald W.F. Diagenetic behavior of methylmercury in organic rich coastal sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 1996, 41:428-434.
32. Ganguli P.M., Mason R.P., Abu-Saba K.E., Anderson R.S., Flegal A.R. Mercury speciation in drainage from the New Idria mercury mine, California. Environ Sci Technol 2000, 34:4773-4779.
33. Gill G. Monomethylmercury photo-degradation studies. Transport, cycling, and fate of mercury and monomethylmercury in the San Francisco Delta and tributaries: an integrated mass balance assessment approach: final report to the California Department of Fish and Game and the California Bay Delta Authority 2008, Task 5.1. [21 pp. http://mercury.mlml.calstate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/09_task5_1_final.pdf (accessed Sept. 30, 2010)].
34. Gilmour C.C., Henry E.A., Mitchell R. Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Environ Sci Technol 1992, 26:2281-2287.
35. Gilmour C.C., Riedel G.S., Ederington M.C., Bell J.T., Benoit J.M., Gill G.A., et al. Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry 1998, 40:327-345.
36. Gilmour C.C., Elias D.A., Kucken A.M., Brown S.D., Palumbo A.V., Schadt C.W., et al. Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:3938-3951. 10.1128/AEM.02993-10.
37. Gray J.E., Crock J.G., Lasorsa B.K. Mercury methylation at mercury mines in the Humboldt River basin, Nevada, USA. Geochem Explor Environ Anal 2002, 2:143-149.
38. Gray J.E., Hines M.E., Higueras P.L., Adatto I., Lasorsa B.K. Mercury speciation and microbial transformations in mine wastes, river sediments, and surface waters at the Almadén mining district, Spain. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38:4285-4292.
39. Guentzel J. Wetland influences on mercury transport and bioaccumulation in South Carolina. Sci Total Environ 2009, 407:1344-1353.
40. Hammerschmidt C.R., Fitzgerald W.F. Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38:1487-1495.
41. Heim W., Coale K., Stephenson M., Choe K.-Y., Gill G., Foe C. Spatial and habitat-based variations in total and methyl mercury concentrations in surficial sediments in the San Francisco Bay-Delta. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41:3501-3507.
42. Horvat M., Nolde N., Fajon V., Jereb V., Logar M., Lojen S., et al. Total mercury methylmercury and selenium in mercury polluted areas in the province Guizhou, China. Sci Total Environ 2003, 304:231-256.
43. Jeremiason J.D., Engstrom D.R., Swain E.B., Nater E.A., Johnson B.M., Almendinger J.E., et al. Sulfate addition increases methylmercury production in an experimental wetland. Environ Sci Technol 2006, 40:3800-3806.
44. Kerin E., Gilmour C.C., Roden E., Suzuki M.T., Coates J.D., Mason R.P. Mercury methylation among the dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72:7919-7921.
45. Kester C.L., Rye R.O., Johnson C.A., Schwartz C.H., Holmes C.H. On-line sulfur isotope analysis of organic material by direct combustion: preliminary results and potential applications. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 2001, 37:53-65.
46. Krabbenhoft D.P., Wiener J.G., Brumbaugh W.G., Olson M.L., DeWild J.F., Sabinal T.J. A national pilot study of mercury contamination of aquatic ecosystems along multiple gradients. USGS Water-Res Invest Rpt 1999, 99-4018:147-160. [Available at: http://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/wri99-4018/Volume2/sectionB/2301_Krabbenhoft/pdf/2301_Krabbenhoft.pdf (accessed: August, 2007)]. D.W. Morganwalp, H.T. Buxton (Eds.).
47. Langmuir D. Aqueous environmental chemistry 1997, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, [600 pp.].
48. Lin C.-C., Jay J.A. Mercury methylation by planktonic and biofilm cultures of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Environ Sci Tech 2007, 41:6691-6697.
49. Lovley D.R. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Microbiol Rev 1991, 55:259-287.
50. Lovley D.R., Holmes D.E., Nevin D.P. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Adv Microb Physiol 2004, 49:219-286.
51. Marvin-DiPasquale M., Alpers C.N., Fleck J.A. Mercury, methylmercury, and other constituents in sediment and water from seasonal and permanent wetlands in the Cache Creek Settling Basin and Yolo Bypass, Yolo County, California, 2005-06. U.S. Geol Surv, Open File Report 2009-1182 2009, [69 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1182/ (accessed Sept. 30, 2010)].
52. Marvin-DiPasquale M., Agee J.L. Microbial mercury cycling in sediments of the San Francisco Bay-Delta. Estuaries 2003, 26:1517-1528.
53. Marvin-DiPasquale M., Windham-Myers L., Agee J.L., Kakouros E., Kieu L.H., Fleck J.A., Alpers C.N., Stricker C.A. Methylmercury production in sediment from agricultural and non-agricultural wetlands in the Yolo Bypass, California 2013, [in this issue].
54. Orem W., Gilmour C., Axelrad D., Krabbenhoft D., Scheidt D., Kalla P., et al. Sulfur in the South Florida Ecosystem: distribution, sources, biogeochemistry, impacts, and management for restoration. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2011, 41(S1):249-288.
55. Parks J.M., Johs A., Podar M., Bridou R., Hurt R.A., Smith S.D., et al. The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 2013, 339(6125):1332-1335. 10.1126/science.1230667.
56. Pickhard P.C., Fisher N.S. Accumulation of inorganic and methylmercury by freshwaterphytoplankton in two contrasting water bodies. Environ Sci Tech 2007, 41:125-131.
57. Rothenberg S.E., Feng X. Mercury cycling in a flooded rice paddy. J Geophys Res 2012, 117. G03003. 10.1029/2011JG001800.
58. Rudd J.W.M. Sources of methyl mercury to freshwater ecosystems: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 1995, 80:697-713.
59. Rumbold D.G., Fink L.E. Extreme spatial variability and unprecedented methylmercury concentrations within a constructed wetland. Environ Monit Assess 2006, 112:115-135.
60. Rytuba J.J. Mercury from mineral deposits and potential environmental impact. Environ Geol 2003, 43:326-338.
61. Schaefer J.K., Morel F.M.M. High methylation rates of mercury bound to cysteine by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Nat Geosci 2009, 2:123-126.
62. Seal R.R., Alpers C.N., Rye R.O. Stable isotope systematics of sulfate minerals. Rev Mineral Geochem 2000, 40:541-602. Mineralogical Society of America and Geochemical Society, Washington, D.C. C.N. Alpers, J.L. Jambor, D.K. Nordstrom (Eds.).
63. Snodgrass J.W., Jagoe C.H., Bryan A.L., Brant H.A., Burger J. Effects of trophic status and wetland morphology, hydroperiod, and water chemistry on mercury concentrations in fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2011, 57:171-180.
64. Sommer T.R., Harrell W.C., Swift T.J. Extreme hydrologic banding in a large-river floodplain, California. U S A Hydrobiol 2008, 598:409-415.
65. Springborn M., Singer M.B., Dunne T. Sediment-adsorbed total mercury flux through Yolo Bypass, the primary floodway and wetland in the Sacramento Valley, California. Sci Total Environ 2011, 412:203-213.
66. St.Louis V.L., Rudd J.W.M., Kelly C.A., Beaty K.G., Bloom N.S., Flett R.J. Importance of wetlands as sources of methylmercury to boreal forest ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1994, 51:1065-1076.
67. St.Louis V.L., Rudd J.W.M., Kelly C.A., Beaty K.G., Robert J.F., Roulet N.T. Production and loss of methylmercury and loss of total mercury from boreal forest catchments containing different types of wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 1996, 30:2719-2729.
68. Trust B.A., Fry B. Stable sulfur isotopes in plants - a review. Plant Cell Environ 1992, 15:1105-1110.
69. Turner A., Millward G.E. Suspended particles: their role in estuarine biogeochemical cycles. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2002, 55:857-883.
70. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water quality standards - establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California, 40 CFR part 131 [accessed Sept. 30, 2010]. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/2000/May/Day-18/w11106.pdf.
71. Windham-Myers L., Fleck J.A., Ackerman J.T., Marvin-DiPasquale M., Stricker C.A., Heim W.A., et al. Mercury cycling in agricultural and managed wetlands: a synthesis of methylmercury production, hydrologic export, and bioaccumulation from an integrated field study 2013, [in this issue-a].
72. Windham-Myers L., Marvin-DiPasquale M., Stricker C., Agee J.L., Kieu L.H., Kakouros E. Mercury cycling in agricultural and managed wetlands, Yolo Bypass, California: vegetation influences on methylmercury production 2013, [in this issue-b].
73. Windham-Myers L., Marvin-DiPasquale M., Kakouros E., Agee J.L., Kieu L.H., Stricker C., et al. Mercury cycling in agricultural and managed wetlands, Yolo Bypass, California: vegetation influences on methylmercury storage, export, and bioaccumulation 2013, [in this issue-c].
74. Wood M.L., Morris P., Cooke J., Louie S.J. Amendments to the water quality control plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River basins for the control of methylmercury and total mercury in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta estuary: staff report, Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region 2010, [April, 332 pp. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5/water_issues/tmdl/central_valley_projects/delta_hg/april_2010_hg_tmdl_hearing/index.shtml (accessed Sept. 30, 2010)].
75. Yuan W.L., Ponnamperuma F.N. Chemical retardation of the reduction of flooded soils and the growth of rice. Plant Soil 1966, 25:347-360.
76. Zhang T., Kim B., Levard C., Reinsch B.C., Lowry G.V., Deshusses M.A., et al. Methylation of mercury by bacteria exposed to dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides. Environ Sci Tech 2012, 46:6950-6958.