Solute and water transport in forward osmosis using polydopamine modified thin film composite membranes

Desalination

Volumn 343, Issue , 2014, Pages 8-16

  Arena, Jason T ^a   Manickam, Seetha S ^a   Reimund, Kevin K ^a   Freeman, Benny D ^b   McCutcheon, Jeffrey R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Forward osmosis; Membrane modification; Polydopamine; Pressure retarded osmosis; Thin film composite membrane

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; DESALINATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; WATER FILTRATION; WETTING;

FORWARD OSMOSIS; MEMBRANE MODIFICATION; POLYDOPAMINE; PRESSURE-RETARDED OSMOSIS; THIN FILM COMPOSITE MEMBRANES;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CATION; DESALINATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; ION EXCHANGE; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; POLARIZATION; WASTE TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84899636125     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005, 174:1-11.
2. Cath T.Y., Gormly S., Beaudry E.G., Flynn M.T., Adams V.D., Childress A.E. Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 257:85-98.
3. Kravath R.E., Davis J.A. Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis. Desalination 1975, 16:151-155.
4. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:233-241.
5. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
6. 2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination 2013, 312:67-74.
7. McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007, 207:370-382.
8. Yen S.K., Mehnas Haja N F., Su M., Wang K.Y., Chung T. Study of draw solutes using 2-methylimidazole-based compounds in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:242-252.
9. Ge Q., Su J., Chung T., Amy G. Hydrophilic superparamagnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and performance in forward osmosis processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 50:382-388.
10. Ling M.M., Wang K.Y., Chung T. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:5869-5876.
11. Cath T.Y., Elimelech M., McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Achilli A., Anastasio D., Brady A.R., Childress A.E., Farr I.V., Hancock N.T., Lampi J., Nghiem L.D., Xie M., Yip N.Y. Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes. Desalination 2013, 312:31-38.
12. Herron J. Asymmetric Forward Osmosis Membranes 2008.
13. Vos K.D., Burris F.O., Riley R.L. Kinetic study of the hydrolysis of cellulose acetate in the pH range of 2-10. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1966, 10:825-832.
14. Watters J.C., Klein E., Fleischman M., Roberts J.S., Hall B. Rejection spectra of reverse osmosis membranes degraded by hydrolysis or chlorine attack. Desalination 1986, 60:93-110.
15. Baker R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England. Second edition.
16. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
17. 13C NMR study. Green Chem. 2006, 8:995-1000.
18. Petersen R.J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 83:81-150.
19. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 318:458-466.
20. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
21. Ghosh A.K., Hoek E.M. Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 336:140-148.
22. Bui N., Lind M.L., Hoek E.M., McCutcheon J.R. Electrospun nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 385-386:10-19.
23. Hydration Technology Innovations™ HTI's New Thin Film Forward Osmosis Membrane in Production http://www.htiwater.com/news/press-room/content/2012/press-HTI-HTIThinFilmMembrane042512.pdf.
24. Coday B.D., Heil D.M., Xu P., Cath T.Y. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:2386-2393.
25. McCloskey B.D., Park H.B., Ju H., Rowe B.W., Miller D.J., Freeman B.D. A bioinspired fouling-resistant surface modification for water purification membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413-414:82-90.
26. McCloskey B.D., Park H.B., Ju H., Rowe B.W., Miller D.J., Chun B.J., Kin K., Freeman B.D. Influence of polydopamine deposition conditions on pure water flux and foulant adhesion resistance of reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, and microfiltration membranes. Polymer 2010, 51:3472-3485.
27. Miller D.J., Araújo P.A., Correia P.B., Ramsey M.M., Kruithof J.C., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Freeman B.D., Paul D.R., Whiteley M., Vrouwenvelder J.S. Short-term adhesion and long-term biofouling testing of polydopamine and poly(ethylene glycol) surface modifications of membranes and feed spacers for biofouling control. Water Res. 2012, 46:3737-3753.
28. Kasemset S., Lee A., Miller D.J., Freeman B.D., Sharma M.M. Effect of polydopamine deposition conditions on fouling resistance, physical properties, and permeation properties of reverse osmosis membranes in oil/water separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 425-426:208-216.
29. Lee H., Scherer N.F., Messersmith P.B. Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:12999-13003.
30. Lee H., Lee Y., Statz A.R., Rho J., Park T.G., Messersmith P.B. Substrate-independent layer-by-layer assembly by using mussel-adhesive-inspired polymers. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20:1619-1623.
31. Lee H., Dellatore S.M., Miller W.M., Messersmith P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318:426-430.
32. Arena J.T., McCloskey B.D., Freeman B.D., McCutcheon J.R. Surface modification of thin film composite membrane support layers with polydopamine: enabling use of reverse osmosis membranes in pressure retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:55-62.
33. Han G., Zhang S., Li X., Widjojo N., Chung T. Thin film composite forward osmosis membranes based on polydopamine modified polysulfone substrates with enhancements in both water flux and salt rejection. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 80:219-231.
34. Manickam S.S., McCutcheon J.R. Characterization of polymeric nonwovens using porosimetry, porometry and X-ray computed tomography. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 407-408:108-115.
35. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: implications for improved membrane design. AIChE J 2007, 53:1736-1744.
36. Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:10273-10282.
37. Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Straub A.P., Romero-Vargas Castrillon S., Elimelech M. A method for the simultaneous determination of transport and structural parameters of forward osmosis membranes 2013, 444:523-538.
38. Robinson R.A., Stokes R.H. Electrolyte Solutions 2002, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, New York. Second Revised edition.
39. Phillip W.A., Yong J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:5170-5176.
40. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6769-6775.
41. Hancock N.T., Phillip W.A., Elimelech M., Cath T.Y. Bidirectional permeation of electrolytes in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:10642-10651.
42. Jeffery G.H., Bassett J., Mendham J., Denney R.C. Vogel's Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis 1989, Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex, England. Fifth edition.
43. Harris D.C. Quantitative Chemical Analysis 2003, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY. Sixth edition.
44. Pan F., Jia H., Qiao S., Jiang Z., Wang J., Wang B., Zhong Y. Bioinspired fabrication of high performance composite membranes with ultrathin defect-free skin layer. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 341:279-285.
45. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y., Leckie J.O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: I. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination 2009, 242:149-167.
46. Dow Water & Process Solutions, FILMTEC™ Reverse Osmosis Membranes Technical Manual, Form No. 609-00071-0309.
47. Cadotte J., Petersen R., Larson R., Erickson E. A new thin-film composite seawater reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 1980, 32:25-31.
48. Dreyer D.R., Miller D.J., Freeman B.D., Paul D.R., Bielawski C.W. Elucidating the structure of poly(dopamine) 2012, 28:6428-6435.
49. Lambert J.B., Shurvell H.F., Lightner D.A., Cooks R.G. Organic Structural Spectroscopy 1998, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
50. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y., Leckie J.O. Characterization of humic acid fouled reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by transmission electron microscopy and streaming potential measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41:942-949.
51. Van Wagner E.M., Freeman B.D., Sharma M.M., Hickner M.A., Altman S.J. Polyamide Desalination Membrane Characterization and Surface Modification to Enhance Fouling Resistance 2010, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
52. Van Wagner E.M., Sagle A.C., Sharma M.M., Freeman B.D. Effect of crossflow testing conditions, including feed ph and continuous feed filtration, on commercial reverse osmosis membrane performance 2009, 345:97-109.
53. Soundara Manickam S., Gelb J., McCutcheon J. Characterization of thin film composite membranes using porosimetry and X-ray microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 2013, 19:634-635.
54. Hesske H., Gloe K. Hydration behavior of alkyl amines and their corresponding protonated forms. 1. Ammonia and methylamine. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111:9848-9853.
55. Low S.C. Preliminary studies of seawater desalination using forward osmosis. Desalin. Water Treat. 2009, 7:41-46.