Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): An open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

The Lancet

Volumn 383, Issue 9927, 2014, Pages 1483-1489

  Mol, Femke ^a   Van Mello, Norah M ^a   Strandell, Annika ^k   Strandell, Karin ^k   Jurkovic, Davor ^n,q   Ross, Jackie ⁿ   Barnhart, Kurt T ^p   Yalcinkaya, Tamer M ^o   Verhoeve, Harold R ^f   Graziosi, Giuseppe C M ⁱ   Koks, Carolien A M ^g   Klinte, Ingmar ^m   Hogström, Lars ^l   Janssen, Ineke C A H ^j   Kragt, Harry ^h   Hoek, Annemieke ^b   Trimbos Kemper, Trudy C M ^d   Broekmans, Frank J M ^e   Willemsen, Wim N P ^c   Ankum, Willem M ^a   Mol, Ben W ^a,r   Van Wely, Madelon ^a   Van Der Veen, Fulco ^a   Hajenius, Petra J ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^f ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^g MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

ⁱ ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^j GROENE HART HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^k SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^l SKARABORG HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^m NU Hospital Group   (Sweden)

ⁿ KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^o WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^r UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; FIBRIN GLUE; METHOTREXATE; ORNIPRESSIN; TERLIPRESSIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTERNET; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MULTICENTER STUDY; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVULATION INDUCTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SALPINGECTOMY; SALPINGOTOMY; TROPHOBLAST; UTERINE TUBE PREGNANCY; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION; UTERUS BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE FERTILITY; LAPAROTOMY; UTERINE TUBE SURGERY;

ADULT; EUROPE; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, TUBAL; SALPINGECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84899635148     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 379-87
2. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol B.W., Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 1: CD000324.
3. Newbatt E, Beckles Z, Ullman R., Lumsden MA, on behalf of the Guideline Development Group. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2012; 345: e8136.
4. Guidelines and Audit Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top guideline number 21: the management of tubal pregnancy. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2004.
5. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie. Richtlijn tubaire EUG, diagnostiek en behandeling. Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie, 2001.
6. Whitehouse B. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in the treatment of tubal gestation. Proc R Soc Med 1922; 15: 17-22.
7. Miller NF. Gynecology; whither bound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1957; 74: 699-704.
8. Rosenblum JM, Dowling RW, Barnes AC Treatment of tubal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1960; 80: 274-77.
9. Richards BC. Persistent trophoblast following conservative operation for ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 100.
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin no 94: medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 1476-84.
11. Mol F, Strandell A, Jurkovic D., et al, for the European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group. The ESEP study: salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; the impact on future fertility: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health 2008, 8: 11.
12. Hajenius PJ, Mol BW, Ankum W.M., van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Lammes FB. Clearance curves of serum human chorionic gonadotrophin for the diagnosis of persistent trophoblast. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 683-87.
13. Higgins JPT, Altman DG Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.1 (updated September, 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
14. Mol BW, Matthijsse HC, Tinga D.J., et al Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1804-09.
15. Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics 1983; 39: 499-503.
16. Fernandez H, Capmas P, Lucot J.P., Resch B., Panel P, Bouyer J, for the GROG. Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 1247-53.
17. de Bennetot M., Rabischong B, Aublet-Cuvelier B, et al Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 1271-76, e1-3.
18. Hajenius PJ, Engelsbel S, Mol B W, et al Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy. Lancet 1997; 350: 774-79.
19. van Mello N.M., Mol F, Opmeer B.C., et al Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer? Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21: 687-93.