Information assurance in a distributed forensic cluster

Digital Investigation

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2014, Pages

  Pringle, Nick ^a   Burgess, Mikhaila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digital forensics; Distributed processing; FUSE file systems; Information assurance; Media analysis

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL FORENSICS; DIGITAL STORAGE; ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES; VIRTUAL STORAGE;

DEBUGGING SOFTWARE; DIGITAL CRIME; DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; FILE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ASSURANCE; MEDIA ANALYSIS; MEDIA IMAGES;

PROGRAM DEBUGGING;

EID: 84899632505     PISSN: 17422876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2014.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abramson D, Foster I, Giddy J, Lewis A, Sosic R, Sutherst R, et al. The Nimrod computational workbench: a case study in desktop metacomputing. Australian Computer Science Communications 1997;19: 17-26.
2. ACPO. ACPO good practice guide for digital evidence http://library.npia. police.uk/docs/acpo/digital-evidence-2012.pdf; 2012.
3. AFFLIB-the advanced forensic format. http://afflib.sourceforge.net/.
4. Ayers D. A second generation computer forensic analysis system. Digital Investigation 2009;6:S34-42.
5. Beebe N. Digital forensic research: the good, the bad and the unaddressed. Advances in Digital Forensics 2009;V:17-36. Springer. Cloudera. http://cloudera.com/; 2014.
6. Dean J, Ghemawat S. MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. In: OSDI '04: 6th symposium on operating systems design and implementation. USENIX Association; 2004. Dictionary.com. http://dictionary. reference.com; 2014.
7. FUSE Filesystem using MySQL as storage.http://mysqlfs.sourceforge.net/ ;2013.
8. Flament R. LoggedFS-filesystem monitoring with Fuse http://loggedfs. sourceforge.net/; 2013.
9. Garfinkel S. Digital forensics research: the next 10 years. Digital Investigation 2010;7:S64-73.
10. Globus. https://www.globus.org/; 2014.
11. Hicks T, Kirkland D, Halcrow M. eCryptfs, a cryptographic stacked filesystem for Linux http://ecryptfs.org/; 2013.
12. ISO 17025:2005. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO; 2005.
13. ISO 27001:2013. Information technology-security techniques-information security management systems-requirements. ISO; 2013.
14. ISO 27037:2012. Information technology d security techniques d guidelines for identification, collection, acquisition, and preservation of digital evidence. ISO; 2012.
15. Justice FBI, U.D. of. Regional computer forensics laboratory annual report for fiscal year 2012 http://www.rcfl.gov/downloads/documents/RCFL-Nat- Annual12pdf; 2012.
16. OAIS. http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf; 2014.
17. PCI Security Standards Council. https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/ index.php.
18. Pringle N, Sutherland I. Is a grid a suitable platform for high performance digital forensics?. In: The 7th European conference on information warfare and security; 2008.
19. Richard III G, Roussev V. Digital forensics tools: the next generation. Digital Crime and Forensic Science in Cyberspace; 2006:75-90. Idea Group Publishing.
20. Richard III G, Roussev V, Marziale L. Forensic discovery auditing of digital evidence containers. Digital Investigation 2007;4:88-97.
21. Robson BA. CurlFtpFS-an FTP filesystem based on Curl and FUSE http://curlftpfs.sourceforge.net/; 2013.
22. Roussev V, Richard III G. Breaking the performance wall: the case for distributed digital forensics. In: Proceedings of the 2004 digital forensics research workshop; 2004.
23. Thain D, Tannenbaum T, Livny M. Distributed computing in practice: the condor experience. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2005;17:323-56.
24. Turner P. Selective and intelligent imaging using digital evidence bags. Digital Investigation 2006;3:59-64.
25. Weka. Waikato environment for knowledge analysis http://www.cs.waikato. ac.nz/ml/index.html; 2014.