Predicting dynamic deformation of retaining structure by LSSVR-based time series method

Neurocomputing

Volumn 137, Issue , 2014, Pages 165-172

  Ji, Zhiwei ^a,b   Wang, Bing ^a,c   Deng, Su Ping ^a   You, Zhuhong ^a,d  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Department of Computer Science and Technology   (China)

^d SHENZHEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Ground settlement; Lateral displacement; LSSVR; Phase space reconstruction; Time series

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; PHASE SPACE METHODS; SETTLEMENT OF STRUCTURES; TIME SERIES;

DYNAMIC DEFORMATION; GROUND SETTLEMENT; GROUND SURFACE SETTLEMENTS; LATERAL DEFORMATION; LATERAL DISPLACEMENTS; LSSVR; PHASE SPACE RECONSTRUCTION; RECONSTRUCTING PHASE SPACE;

DEFORMATION;

EID: 84899618956     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.03.073     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Luo Z.J., Zhang Y.Y., Wu Y.X. Finite element numerical simulation of three-dimensional seepage control for deep foundation pit dewatering. J. Hydrodyn. 2008, 20:596-602.
2. Huang D.S. The local minima-free condition of feedforward neural networks for outer-supervised learning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B 1998, 28:477-480.
3. Huang D.S. Radial basis probabilistic neural networks: model and application. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. 1999, 13:1083-1101.
4. Chua C.G., Goh A.T.C. Estimating wall deflections in deep excavations using Bayesian neural networks. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 2005, 20:400-409.
5. Leu S.S., Lo H.C. Neural-network-based regression model of ground surface settlement induced by deep excavation. Autom. Constr. 2004, 13:279-289.
6. Huang D.S., Du J.X. A constructive hybrid structure optimization methodology for radial basis probabilistic neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2008, 19:2099-2115.
7. Huang D.S., Jiang W. A general CPL-AdS methodology for fixing dynamic parameters in dual environments. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B 2012, 42:1489-1500.
8. Huang D.S., Ip H.H.S., Law K.C.K., Chi Z. Zeroing polynomials using modified constrained neural network approach. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2005, 16:721-732.
9. Huang D.S., Ip H.H.S., Chi Z.R. A neural root finder of polynomials based on root moments. Neural Comput. 2004, 16:1721-1762.
10. Huang D.S. A constructive approach for finding arbitrary roots of polynomials by neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2004, 15:477-491.
11. Huang D.S. The united adaptive learning algorithm for the link weights and shape parameter in RBFN for pattern recognition. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. 1997, 11:873-888.
12. Sivakumar B. Forecasting monthly streamflow dynamics in the western United States: a nonlinear dynamical approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 2003, 18:721-728.
13. Dhanya C.T., Kumar D.N. Multivariate nonlinear ensemble prediction of daily chaotic rainfall with climate inputs. J. Hydrol. 2011, 403:292-306.
14. Martinez-Rego D., Fontenla-Romero O., Alonso-Betanzos A. Efficiency of local models ensembles for time series prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:6884-6894.
15. Araujo R.D. Translation invariant morphological time-lag added evolutionary forecasting method for stock market prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:2835-2848.
16. Gieseke F., Airola A., Pahikkala T., Kramer O. Fast and simple gradient-based optimization for semi-supervised support vector machines. Neurocomputing 2014, 123:23-32.
17. Suykens J.A.K., Vandewalle J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 1999, 9:293-300.
18. Suykens J.A.K., De Brabanter J., Lukas L., Vandewalle J. Weighted least squares support vector machines: robustness and sparse approximation. Neurocomputing 2002, 48:85-105.
19. Wold S., Sjostrom M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 58:109-130.
20. Segovia F., Gorriz J.M., Ramirez J., Salas-Gonzalez D., Alvarez I., Lopez M., Chaves R. A comparative study of feature extraction methods for the diagnosis of Alzheimer[U+05F3]s disease using the ADNI database. Neurocomputing 2012, 75:64-71.
21. Maus A., Sprott J.C. Neural network method for determining embedding dimension of a time series. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 2011, 16:3294-3302.
22. Cao L.Y. Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of a scalar time series. Physica D 1997, 110:43-50.
23. Khemchandani R., Jayadeva, Chandra S. Regularized least squares fuzzy support vector regression for financial time series forecasting. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:132-138.
24. Kavaklioglu K. Modeling and prediction of Turkey[U+05F3]s electricity consumption using Support Vector Regression. Appl. Energy 2011, 88:368-375.
25. An S.J., Liu W.Q., Venkatesh S. Fast cross-validation algorithms for least squares support vector machine and kernel ridge regression. Pattern Recognit. 2007, 40:2154-2162.
26. Rubio G., Pomares H., Rojas I., Herrera L.J. A heuristic method for parameter selection in LS-SVM: application to time series prediction. Int. J. Forecast. 2011, 27:725-739.
27. Hong W.C. Chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm in a support vector regression electric load forecasting model. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50:105-117.
28. Yang Z., Gu X.S., Liang X.Y., Ling L.C. Genetic algorithm-least squares support vector regression based predicting and optimizing model on carbon fiber composite integrated conductivity. Mater. Des. 2010, 31:1042-1049.
29. Pai P.F., Hong W.C. Support vector machines with simulated annealing algorithms in electricity load forecasting. Energy Convers. Manag. 2005, 46:2669-2688.
30. Tay F.E.H., Cao L.J. Application of support vector machines in financial time series forecasting. Omega - Int. J. Manag. Sci. 2001, 29:309-317.