Nine: How private higher education?s growth challenges the new institutionalism

The New Institutionalism in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 143-161

  Levy, Daniel C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899599002     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. This chapter originated as PROPHE (Program for Research on Private Higher Education) working paper no. 3, 2003, http://www. albany. edu/~prophe/. Sampaio 2000
2. Galasi and Varga (2002); Nagy (1996). I also draw off my own World Bank consultancy in the country in 1996, specifically on public policy for private higher edu-cation growth. Forty percent of Hungary's total higher education institutions are Catholic
3. Both Hungary's and Argentina's (www. coneau. gov. ar) accreditation agencies are for both the public and the private sectors, exerting some isomorphic force
4. Nagy and Darvas (1999, 173-74)
5. Altbach, Philip. G., ed. 1999. Private Prometheus: Private higher education and development in the twenty-first century. Westport, CT: Greenwood
6. Balán, Jorge. 1990. Private universities within the Argentine higher education system: Trends and prospects. Higher Education Policy 3(2): 13-17
7. Balán, Jorge, and Ana M. García de Fanelli. 1993. El sector privado de la educación superior: Políticas públicas y sus resultados recientes en cinco países de América Latina. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES)
8. Birnbaum, Robert. 1983. Maintaining diversity in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
9. Brint, Steven, and Jerome Karabel. 1991. Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges." In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, 337-60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
10. Catholic University of Hungary. n. d. Pazmany Peter Katolikus Egyetem. Budapest. Department of Development and Planning, Ministry of Education, PRC. Educational statistics yearbook of China (1996-2001). Beijing: People's Education Press
11. DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147-60
12. -. 1991. Introduction. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. W. Powell and Paul DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
13. Durham, Eunice, and Maria Helena Sampaio. 2000. La educación privada en América Latina: Estado y mercado. In Políticas de reforma de la educación superior y la universidad latinoamericana hacia el final del milenio, ed. J. Balán. UNAM/CESU. Eisemon, Thomas Owen, Ioan Mihailescu, Lazar Vlasceanu, Catalin Zamfir, John
14. Sheenan, and Charles H. Davis. 1995. Higher education reform in Romania. Higher Education 30: 135-52
15. Galasi, Péter, and Júlia Varga. 2000. Public and private initiatives in higher education: The case of Hungary
16. García de Fanelli, Ana M. 1997. Las nuevas universidades del conurbano bonaerense. Buenos Aires: CEDES working paper no. 117
17. -. 2001. La formación de posgrado en las ciencias sociales argentinas. Education Policy Analysis Archives 9(29)
18. García Guadilla, Carmen. 1996. Situación y principales dinámicas de transformación de la educación superior en América latina. Caracas: CRESALC/UNESCO
19. Giesecke, Hans C. 1999. The rise of private higher education in East Central Europe. Society and Economy 21(1)
20. Hall, Richard H. 1996. Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes, 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
21. Haveman, Heather. 1993. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 593-627
22. Kraatz, Matthew, and Edward Zajac. 1996. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism. American Sociological Review 61: 812-36
23. Kulachol, Thanu. 1995. Private higher education in Thailand. In Private higher education in Asia and the Pacific: Final report, part 2: seminar papers, ed. T.-I. Wongsothorn and Y. Wang, 109-27. Bangkok: UNESCO PROAP and SEAMEO RIHED
24. Kwong, Julia. 1997. The reemergence of private schools in socialist China. Comparative Education Review 41(3): 244-59
25. Law, Wing-Wah. 1995. The role of the state in higher education reform: Mainland China and Taiwan. Comparative Education Review 39(3): 322-55
26. Levy, Daniel C. 1986. Higher education and the state in Latin America: Private challenges to public dominance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
27. -. 1992. Private institutions of higher education. In The encyclopedia of higher education, ed. B. Clark and G. Neave. New York: Pergamon
28. -. 1993. Recent trends in the privatization of Latin American higher education: Solidification, breadth, and vigor. Higher Education Policy 6(4)
29. -. 1996. Building the third sector: Latin America's private research centers and nonprofit development. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press
30. -. 1999. When private higher education does not bring organizational diversity: Argentina, China, Hungary. In Private Prometheus: Private higher education and development in the twenty-first century, ed. P. Altbach, 17-50. West Port, CT: Greenwood
31. -. 2002a. The emergence of private higher education's roles: International tendencies relevant to recent Chinese reality. Peking University, Higher Education Forum, no. 1, 2002, 89-96; Xiamen University, International Higher Education 2, 2002: 1-8
32. -. 2002b. Unanticipated development: Perspectives on private higher education's emerging roles. PROPHE Working Paper No. 1, April 2002, Program for Research on Private Higher Education (PROPHE), State University of New York at Albany. Available online at http://www. albany. edu/~prophe/publication/ paper. html
33. Marginson, Simon. 1997. Imagining ivy: Pitfalls in the privatization of higher education in Australia. Comparative Education Review 41(4): 460-80
34. Marginson, Simon, and Mark Considine. 2000. The enterprise university: Power, governance, and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press
35. Meek, Lynn, L. Goedegebuue, O. Kivinen, and R. Rinne. 1996. The mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education. Oxford: Pergamon
36. Meyer, John, and Brian Rowan. 1991. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In Powell and DiMaggio, 108-42
37. Min, Weifang. 1991. Higher education finance in China: Current constraints and strategies for the 1990s. Higher Education 21: 151-61
38. Ministry of Culture and Education. 1996. Higher education in Hungary: The higher education act. Budapest
39. Mok, Ka-ho. 1997. Retreat of the state: Marketization of education in the Pearl River Delta. Comparative Education Review 41(3): 260-76
40. Nagy, Judit. 1996. Constraints on development of private higher education in Hungary. Report for the World Bank. November
41. Nagy-Darvas, Judit, and Peter Darvas. 1999. Private higher education in Hungary: The market influences the university. In Private Prometheus: Private higher education and development in the twenty-first century, ed. P. G. Altbach. Westport, CT: Greenwood
42. Neave, Guy. 1996. Homogenization, integration and convergence: The Cheshire cats of higher education analysis. In Meek et al. 26-41
43. Pan, Maoyuan, and Yitong Wei. 1995. China: Legislation guarantee for the development of private higher education. In Private higher education in Asia and the Pacific: Final report, part 2: seminar papers, ed. T.-I. Wongsothorn and Y. Wang, 9-12. Bangkok: UNESCO PROAP and SEAMEO RIHED
44. Powell, Walter. 1991. Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In Powell and DiMaggio
45. Powell, Walter, and Paul DiMaggio, eds. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 183-203. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
46. Sadlak, Jan. 1994. The emergence of a diversified system: The state/private predicament in transforming higher education in Romania. European Journal of Education 29(1)
47. Salamon, Lester M. 1995. Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
48. Sawyerr, Akilagpa. 2002. Challenges facing African universities: Association of African universities. Draft
49. Tomusk, Voldemar. 2003. The war of institutions, episode 1: The rise, and the rise private higher education in Eastern Europe. Higher Education Policy 16: 213-38
50. Wongsothorn, Tong-In, and Yibing Wang, eds. 1995a. Private higher education in Asia and the Pacific: Final report, part 1: Summary and recommendations. Bangkok: UNESCO PROAP and SEAMEO RIHED
51. Wongsothorn,Tong-In, and Yibing Wang, eds. 1995b. Private higher education in Asia and the Pacific: Final report, part II: seminar papers. Bangkok: UNESCO PROAP and SEAMEO RIHED
52. Yin, Qiping, and Gordon White. 1994. The marketisation of Chinese higher education: A critical assessment. Comparative Education 30(3): 217-37
53. Zhou, Nanzhao. 1995. The evolution and policies concerning NGO-sponsored higher education in China. In Private higher education in Asia and the Pacific: Final report, part 2: seminar papers, ed. T.-I. Wongsothorn and Y. Wang, 13-24. Bangkok: UNESCO PROAP and SEAMEO RIHED.