Learning english for technical purposes: The LENTEC project

Self, Peer and Group Assessment in E-Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 169-190

  Dragemark, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899596745     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-965-6.ch007     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Allwood, C. M., & Jonsson, A. C. (2001). Om betydelsen av elevers metakognitiva förmåga [On the significance of students' metacognitive ability]. In G. Svingby & S. Svingby (Eds.), Bedömning av kunskap och kompetens [Assessment of knowledge and competence] PRIM-gruppen (pp. 79-97). Stockholm: Lärarhögskolan i Stockholm, Institutionen för undervisningsprocesser, kommunikation och lärande.
2. Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. S. (1989). The construct validation of self ratings of communicative language ability. Language Testing, 6, 14-25.
3. Björk, U. (2004). Distributed problem-based learning: Studies of a pedagogical model in practice. Doctoral dissertation, Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 221, Göteborg University.
4. Blanche, P., & Merino, B. J. (1989). Self assessment of foreign language skills: Implications for teachers and researchers. Language Learning, 39, 313-340.
5. Council of Europe (2001a). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press and author.
6. Council of Europe, (2001b). European language portfolio. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,.
7. Delors, J., Mufti, I. A., Amagi, I., Carneiro, R., Chung, F., Geremak, B., et al. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
8. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. J. (1989). Student self assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-430.
9. Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.
10. Holec, H. (Ed.). (1988). Autonomy and self directed learning: Present fields of application. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Cooperation.
11. Janssen-van Dieten, A. M. (1992). Zelfbeoordeling en tweede-taalleren [Self assessment in second language learning]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
12. Moore, G. M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge.
13. National Agency for Education (2001). The Swedish self assessment material: English course, A. Retrieved from http://www2.educ.umu.se/~provb/engelska/prov/index.html
14. Oscarson, M. (1978). Approaches to self assessment in foreign language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Co-operation. Also published in 1980 by Pergamon Press, Oxford.
15. Oscarson, M. (Ed.). (1980). Behovsanpassad undervisning och självbedömning av färdigheter i moderna språk: Några försök. Språkpedagogiskt centrum, Göteborgs universitet. [Needs-oriented teaching and self assessment of modern language skills: Some case Studies. Work papers from the Language Teaching Research Center, No. 28. Göteborg University, Department of Education.]
16. Oscarson, M. (1984). Self assessment of foreign language skills: A survey of research and development work. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Co-operation.
17. Oscarson, M. (1998). Om självbedömning av språkfärdighet-empiri och reflektioner [On self assessment of language skills-Empirical data and reflections]. In B. Ljung & A. Pettersson (Eds.), Perspektiv på bedömning av kunskap [Perspectives on the assessment of knowledge]. Lärarhögskolan i Stockholm, Institutionen för pedagogik.
18. Oscarson, M. (1999). Estimating language ability by self assessment: A review of some of the issues. In Papers on Language Learning Teaching Assessment. Festskrift till Torsten Lindblad, Göteborgs universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik.
19. Oscarson, M. (2002). En steg/framework-jämförelse. [A comparison of Swedish grading levels ('Steg') and the Council of Europe framework levels]. Skolverket, Stockholm, och Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik, Göteborgs universitet. [Unpublished report.]
20. Peirce, B. N., Swain, M., & Hart, D. (1993). Self assessment, French immersion, and locus of control. Applied Linguistics, 14, 25-42.
21. Perkins, P. (Ed.). (2004a). The LENTEC guide to learning English: Problem based learning in virtual mobility projects. Malmö: The Board of Education and The European Commission: Leonardo da Vinci Programme.
22. Perkins, P. (2004b). LENTEC: Problem based learning in virtual mobility projects. Paper presented at EfVET (European federation of Technical and Vocational Education and Training). Maastricht.
23. Prohaska, V., & Maraj, F. (1995). Low and medium ability students confidently overestimate all their grades. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society. New York.
24. Purpura, J. E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47(2), 289-325.
25. Ross, S. (1998). Self assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1-20.