Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) of Citations in Scholarly Literature: Dynamic Qualities of "transient" and "sticky Knowledge Claims"

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 797-811

  Baumgartner, Susanne E ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOGISTIC REGRESSION; PAPER;

DECAY PATTERNS; DYNAMIC QUALITY; HIGHLY-CITED PAPERS; MULTINOMIAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION; ORDER POLYNOMIALS; PREDICTOR VARIABLES; SLEEPING BEAUTY; TRAJECTORY MODELING;

TRAJECTORIES;

EID: 84899558411     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23009     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Altman, J.D., Moss, P., Goulder, P., Barouch, D.H., McHeyzer-Williams, M.G., Bell, J.I., ⋯ Davis, M.M. (1996). Phenotypic analysis of antigenspecific T lymphocytes. Science, 274(5284), 94-96.
2. Andruff, H., Carraro, N., Thompson, A., Gaudreau, P., & Louvet, B. (2009). Latent class growth modelling: a tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5(1), 11-24.
3. Aversa, E.S. (1985). Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7(3), 383-389.
4. Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2010). Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 228-230.
5. Bornmann, L., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The new excellence indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 333-335.
6. Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Daniel, H.-D. (2012). What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 11-18.
7. Burrell, Q.L. (2005). Are "sleeping beauties" to be expected? Scientometrics, 65(3), 381-389.
8. Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.
9. Hausman, J.A., Hall, B.H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(4), 902-938.
10. Hicke, L., & Riezman, H. (1996). Ubiquitination of a yeast plasma membrane receptor signals its ligand-stimulated endocytosis. Cell, 84(2), 277-287.
11. Jones, B.L., Nagin, D.S., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(3), 374-393.
12. Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), 1-14.
13. Leydesdorff, L. (1991). The static and dynamic analysis of network data using information theory. Social Networks, 13(4), 301-345.
14. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278-287.
15. Leydesdorff, L., & Bensman, S.J. (2006). Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1470-1486.
16. Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2012). Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1901-1902.
17. Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Opthof, T. (2011). Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1370-1381.
18. Merton, R.K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606-623.
19. Nagin, D.S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Nagin, D.S., & Odgers, C.L. (2010a). Group-based trajectory modeling (nearly) two decades later. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 445-453.
21. Nagin, D.S., & Odgers, C.L. (2010b). Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 109-138.
22. National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators. Washington DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/ statistics/seind12/
23. Nussenzweig, A., Chen, C., da Costa Soares, V., Sanchez, M., Sokol, K., Nussenzweig, M.C., & Li, G.C. (1996). Requirement for Ku80 in growth and immunoglobulinV(D) J recombination. Nature, 382(6591), 551-555.
24. Ponomarev, I. (in preparation). Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0: Can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction.
25. Ponomarev, I., Williams, D., Hackett, C.J., Schnell, J.D., & Haak, L.L. (2013). Predicting highly cited papers: A method for early detection of candidate breakthroughs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (in press).
26. de Solla Price, D.J. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In C.E. Nelson & D.K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 3-22). Lexington, MA: Heath.
27. de Solla Price, D.J. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292-306.
28. Rotolo, D., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2013). When does centrality matter? Scientific productivity and the moderating role of research specialization and cross-community ties. Journal of Organizational Behavior (in press).
29. Seglen, P.O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628-638.
30. Van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467-472.
31. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E., Tijssen, R.J.W., van Eck, N.J., ⋯ Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419-2432.