Second-hand drinking may increase support for alcohol policies: New results from the 2010 National Alcohol Survey

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 259-267

  Greenfield, Thomas K ^a   Karriker Jaffe, Katherine J ^a   Giesbrecht, Norman ^b   Kerr, William C ^a   Ye, Yu ^a   Bond, Jason ^a  

^a PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alcohol drinking; Family; Policy; Public opinion; Victimisation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; CRIME VICTIM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ATTITUDE; CRIME VICTIMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MALE; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899539541     PISSN: 09595236     EISSN: 14653362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12131     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Giesbrecht N, Cukier S, Steeves D. Collateral damage from alcohol: implications of 'second-hand effects of drinking' for populations and health priorities [Editorial]. Addiction 2010;105:1323-1325.
2. Greenfield TK, Ye Y, Kerr WC, Bond J, Rehm J, Giesbrecht N. Externalities from alcohol consumption in the 2005 US National Alcohol Survey: implications for policy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:3205-3224.
3. Fillmore KM. The social victims of drinking. Br J Addict 1985 September;80:307-314.
4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2007 traffic safety annual assessment-alcohol-impaired driving fatalities. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, 2008. Report No. DOT HS 811016.
5. Perrine MW, Peck RC, Fell JC. Epidemiologic perspectives on drunk driving. In: Office of the Surgeon General, ed. Surgeon General's Workshop on Drunk Driving: background papers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1989:35-76.
6. Ross HL. Confronting drunk driving: social policy for saving lives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.
7. Little RE, Young A, Streissguth AP, Uhl CN. Preventing fetal alcohol effects: effectiveness of a demonstration project. In: Porter R, O'Connor M, Whelan J, eds. Mechanisms of alcohol damage in utero: Ciba Foundation symposium 105. London: Pitman, 1984:254-274.
8. Riley EP, Clarren S, Weinberg J, Jonsson E, eds. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: management and policy perspectives of FASD. New York: Wiley & Sons, 2011.
9. Thanh NX, Jonsson E, Dennett L, Jacobs P. Costs of FASD. In: Riley EP, Clarren S, Weinberg J, Jonsson E, eds. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: management and policy perspectives of FASD. New York: Wiley & Sons, 2011:45-68.
10. Graham K, Bernards S, Munné M, Wilsnack SC, eds. Unhappy hours: alcohol and partner aggression in the Americas. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2009.
11. Laslett A-M, Ferris J, Dietze P, Room R. Social demography of alcohol-related harm to children in Australia. Addiction 2012;107:1082-1089.
12. Room R, Ferris J, Laslett A-M, Livingston M, Mugavin J, Wilkinson C. The drinker's effect on the social environment: a conceptual framework for studying alcohol's harm to others. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7:1855-1871.
13. Livingston M, Wilkinson C, Laslett A-M. Impact of heavy drinkers on others' health and well-being. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2010;71:778-785.
14. Cherpitel CJ, Ye Y, Bond J, Room R, Borges G. Attribution of alcohol to violence-related injury: self and others' drinking in the event. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2012;73:227-284.
15. Ferris JA, Laslett A-M, Livingston M, Room R, Wilkinson C. The impacts of others' drinking on mental health. Med J Aust 2011;195:S22-26.
16. Laslett A-M, Catalano P, Chikritzhs T, etal. The range and magnitude of alcohol's harm to others. Melbourne: AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Eastern Health, 2010. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/5wB6fDhnQ (accessed February 2011).
17. Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Sacks JJ, Simon CJ, Brewer RD. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the US, 2006. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:516-524.
18. Holmila M, Mustonen H, Österberg E, Raitasalo K. Public opinion and community-based prevention of alcohol-related harms. Addict Res Theory 2009;17:360-371.
19. Greenfield TK, Ye Y, Giesbrecht N. Alcohol policy opinions in the United States over a 15-year period of dynamic per capita consumption changes: implications for today's public health practice. Contemp Drug Prob 2007;34:649-680.
20. Mäkelä K, Room R, Single E, Sulkunen P, Walsh B, eds. Alcohol, society and the state: 1. A comparative study of alcohol control. Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation, 1981.
21. Greenfield TK, Room R. Situational norms for drinking and drunkenness: trends in the U.S. adult population, 1979-1990. Addiction 1997;92:33-47.
22. Room R, Greenfield TK, Weisner C. People who might have liked you to drink less: changing responses to drinking by U.S. family members and friends, 1979-1990. Contemp Drug Prob 1991;18:573-595.
23. Reinarman C. The social construction of an alcohol problem: the case of Mothers Against Drunk Drivers and social control in the 1980s. Theory Soc 1988;17:91-120.
24. Office of the Surgeon General. Surgeon General's Workshop on drunk driving: proceedings. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1989.
25. Wagenaar AC, Toomey TL. Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. J Stud Alcohol 2002;14(Suppl. 14):206-225.
26. Greenfield TK, Midanik LT, Rogers JD. A ten-year national trend study of alcohol consumption 1984-1995: is the period of declining drinking over? Am J Public Health 2000;90:47-52.
27. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December 2008. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2009. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/68Q6oLoEC (accessed June 2012).
28. Frey J. Survey research by telephone. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, 1989.
29. Greenfield TK, Midanik LT, Rogers JD. Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption. Addiction 2000;95:227-284.
30. Midanik LT, Rogers JD, Greenfield TK. Mode differences in reports of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm. In: Cynamon ML, Kulka RA, eds. Seventh Conference on Health Survey Research Methods [DHHS Publication No (PHS) 01-1013]. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2001:129-133.
31. Kerr WC, Greenfield TK, Ye Y, Bond J, Rehm J. Are the 1976-1985 birth cohorts heavier drinkers? Age-period-cohort analyses of the National Alcohol Surveys 1979-2010. Addiction 2013;108:1038-1048.
32. Greenfield TK, Ye Y, Giesbrecht NA. Views of alcohol control policies in the 2000 National Alcohol Survey: what news for alcohol policy development in the US and its states? J Subst Use 2007;12:429-445.
33. Eliany M, Giesbrecht N, Nelson M, Wellman B, Wortley S. Alcohol and drug use by Canadians: A National Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey (1989) technical report. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada, 1992.
34. Karriker-Jaffe KJ, Greenfield TK. Gender differences in associations of neighbourhood disadvantage with alcohol's harms to others: a cross-sectional study from the United States. Drug Alcohol Rev 2014;33:296-303.
35. Greenfield TK. Ways of measuring drinking patterns and the difference they make: experience with graduated frequencies. J Subst Abuse 2000;12:33-49.
36. Greenfield TK, Kerr WC, Bond J, Ye Y, Stockwell T. Improving graduated frequencies alcohol measures for monitoring consumption patterns: results from an Australian national survey and a US diary validity study. Contemp Drug Prob 2009;36:705-733.
37. Greenfield TK, Kerr WC. Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities. Addiction 2008;103:1082-1099.
38. Wechsler H, Dowdall GW, Davenport A, Rimm EB. A gender-specific measure of binge drinking among college students. Am J Public Health 1995;85:982-985.
39. Greenfield TK, Johnson SP, Giesbrecht NA. Public opinion on alcohol policy: a review of U.S. research. Contemp Drug Prob 2004;31:759-790.
40. Babor TF, Caetano R, Casswell S, etal. Alcohol: no ordinary commodity. Research and public policy, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
41. Giesbrecht NA, Greenfield TK. Preventing alcohol-related problems in the US through policy: media campaigns, regulatory approaches and environmental interventions. J Primary Prev 2003;24:63-104.
42. Greenfield TK. Alcohol policy. Presented at Alcohol and Alcohol Actions (Psychosocial) Lecture Series, Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism. Baltimore, MD, 23-24 June 2006. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/64lg2v8Q6 (accessed January 2012).
43. Rehm J, Greenfield TK. Public alcohol policy: current directions and new opportunities. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;83:640-643.
44. Room R, Giesbrecht N, Graves K, Greenfield TK. Trends in public opinion about alcohol policy initiatives in Ontario and the U.S.: 1989-91. Drug Alcohol Rev 1995;14:35-47.
45. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/66VO1tfz3 (Accessed 28 March 2012).
46. World Health Organization. Global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/69JCGLnOB (Accessed 20 July 2012).
47. Room R, Schmidt L, Rehm J, Mäkelä P. International regulation of alcohol: a framework convention is needed, as for tobacco control. BMJ 2008;337:a2364.
48. Casswell S. Current status of alcohol marketing policy-an urgent challenge for global governance. Addict Recovery 2012;107:478-485.
49. Greenfield TK, Johnson SP, Giesbrecht NA. The alcohol policy development process: policy makers speak. Contemp Drug Prob 2004;31:627-654.