Is the long form of the fugl-meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke?

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 941-949

  Chen, Kuan Lin ^a,b   Chen, Cheng Te ^c   Chou, Yei Tai ^d,e   Shih, Ching Lin ^f   Koh, Chia Lin ^g   Hsieh, Ching Lin ^g,h  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^f NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^g NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^h NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Outcome assessment; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; FUGL MEYER MOTOR SCALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; ICD-9; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; RASCH ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE;

OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; REHABILITATION; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AGED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84899513157     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. G. Guyatt, S. Walter, and G. Norman Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments J Chronic Dis 40 1987 171 178
2. J.C. Hobart, S.J. Cano, and A.J. Thompson Effect sizes can be misleading: is it time to change the way we measure change? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81 2010 1044 1048
3. C.Y. Chou, C.W. Chien, I.P. Hsueh, C.F. Sheu, C.H. Wang, and C.L. Hsieh Developing a short form of the Berg Balance Scale for people with stroke Phys Ther 86 2006 195 204
4. J.C. Hobart, and A.J. Thompson The five item Barthel index J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71 2001 225 230
5. J.J. van der Putten, J.C. Hobart, J.A. Freeman, and A.J. Thompson Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66 1999 480 484
6. A.R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jaasko, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S. Steglind The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance Scand J Rehabil Med 7 1975 13 31
7. D.J. Gladstone, C.J. Danells, and S.E. Black The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16 2002 232 240
8. P.W. Duncan, M. Propst, and S.G. Nelson Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident Phys Ther 63 1983 1606 1610
9. I.P. Hsueh, M.J. Hsu, C.F. Sheu, S. Lee, C.L. Hsieh, and J.H. Lin Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale and 2 versions of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 2008 737 744
10. J. Sanford, J. Moreland, L.R. Swanson, P.W. Stratford, and C. Gowland Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke Phys Ther 73 1993 447 454
11. M. Alt Murphy, A. Danielsson, and K.S. Sunnerhagen Letter by Murphy et al regarding article, "Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials" Stroke 42 2011 e402
12. M.L. Woodbury, C.A. Velozo, L.G. Richards, P.W. Duncan, S. Studenski, and S.M. Lai Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88 2007 715 723
13. A.R. Fugl-Meyer, and L. Jaasko Post-stroke hemiplegia and ADL-performance Scand J Rehabil Med 7 1980 140 152
14. J.H. van der Lee, H. Beckerman, G.J. Lankhorst, and L.M. Bouter The responsiveness of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale in chronic stroke patients J Rehabil Med 33 2001 110 113
15. Y.W. Hsieh, I.P. Hsueh, Y.T. Chou, C.F. Sheu, C.L. Hsieh, and G. Kwakkel Development and validation of a short form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in patients with stroke Stroke 38 2007 3052 3054
16. W.H. Hou, C.L. Shih, and Y.T. Chou et al. Development of a computerized adaptive testing system of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in stroke patients Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 2012 1014 1020
17. H.F. Mao, I.P. Hsueh, P.F. Tang, C.F. Sheu, and C.L. Hsieh Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients Stroke 33 2002 1022 1027
18. M.L. Wu, R.J. Adams, M.R. Wilson, and S.A. Haldane Acerconquest version 2: generalised item response modelling software 2007 Australian Council for Educational Research Camberwell
19. T. Platz, C. Pinkowski, F. van Wijck, I.H. Kim, P. di Bella, and G. Johnson Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study Clin Rehabil 19 2005 404 411
20. J.A. Husted, R.J. Cook, V.T. Farewell, and D.D. Gladman Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations J Clin Epidemiol 53 2000 459 468
21. F.J. Molnar, B. Hutton, and D. Fergusson Does analysis using "last observation carried forward" introduce bias in dementia research? Can Med Assoc J 179 2008 751 753
22. B.D. Wright, and J.M. Linacre Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70 1989 857 860
23. R.D. Hays, L.S. Morales, and S.P. Reise Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century Med Care 38 2000 II28 II42
24. M.T. King A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11 2011 171 184
25. S.E. Embretson A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change Psychometrika 56 1991 495 515
26. G.H. Fischer The precision of gain scores under an item response theory perspective: a comparison of asymptotic and exact conditional inference about change Appl Psych Meas 27 2003 3 26
27. J.M. Marvelde te, C.W. Glas, G. Van Landeghem, and J. Van Damme Application of multidimensional item response theory models to longitudinal data Educ Psychol Meas 66 2006 5 34
28. W.C. Wang, and C.I. Wu Gain scores in item response theory as an effect size measure Educ Psychol Meas 64 2004 758 780
29. W.C. Wang, M. Wilson, and R.J. Adams Measuring individual differences in change with Rasch models J Outcome Meas 2 1998 240 265
30. R.D. Crosby, R.L. Kolotkin, and G.R. Williams Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life J Clin Epidemiol 56 2003 395 407