Trends and perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic nephrectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 473-479

  Liu, Jen Jane ^a   Leppert, John T ^b   Maxwell, Bryan G ^b   Panousis, Periklis ^b   Chung, Benjamin I ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic nephrectomy; Nephron sparing surgery; Robotic nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CANCER SURGERY; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY CANCER; KIDNEY FAILURE; LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPEN PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN SPACE INFECTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RESIDENT; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTIC NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SEPSIS; WOUND INFECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FOLLOW UP; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; PROGNOSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRENDS;

COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84899483009     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: 18732496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Smaldone M.C., Kutikov A., Egleston B., Simhan J., Canter D.J., Teper E., et al. Assessing performance trends in laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal tumors. Urology 2012, 80:286-291.
2. Kowalczyk K.J., Choueiri T.K., Hevelone N.D., Trinh Q.-D., Lipsitz S.R., Nguyen P.L., et al. Comparative effectiveness, costs and trends in treatment of small renal masses from 2005 to 2007. BJU Int 2013, 112:E272-E280.
3. Patel S.G., Penson D.F., Pabla B., Clark P.E., Cookson M.S., Chang S.S., et al. National trends in the use of partial nephrectomy: a rising tide that has not lifted all boats. J Urol 2012, 187:816-821.
4. Chow W.H., Devesa S.S., Warren J.L., Fraumeni J.F. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. J Am Med Assoc 1999, 281:1628-1631.
5. Hollingsworth J.M., Miller D.C., Daignault S., Hollenbeck B.K. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:1331-1334.
6. Lau W.K., Blute M.L., Weaver A.L., Torres V.E., Zincke H. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc 2000, 75:1236-1242.
7. McKiernan J., Simmons R., Katz J., Russo P. Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology 2002, 59:816-820.
8. Novick A., Campbell S. Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass (2009). American Urological Association Web site. J Urol 2009, 182:1271-1279.
9. Shiloach M., Frencher S.K., Steeger J.E., Rowell K.S., Bartzokis K., Tomeh M.G., et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2010, 210:6-16.
10. Hutter M.M., Rowell K.S., Devaney L.A., Sokal S.M., Warshaw A.L., Abbott W.M., et al. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2006, 203:618-624.
11. Davenport DL, Holsapple CW, Conigliaro J. Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set. Am J Med Qual 2009, 24:395-402.
12. Yu P., Chang D.C., Osen H.B., Talamini M.A. NSQIP reveals significant incidence of death following discharge. J Surg Res 2011, 170:e217-e224.
13. Yu H., Hevelone N.D., Lipsitz S.R., Kowalczyk K.J., Hu J.C. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 2012, 187:1392-1398.
14. Patel H.D., Mullins J.K., Pierorazio P.M., Jayram G., Cohen J.E., Matlaga B.R., et al. Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2012, 189:1229-1235.
15. Abouassaly R., Alibhai S.M.H., Tomlinson G., Timilshina N., Finelli A. Unintended consequences of laparoscopic surgery on partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer. J Urol 2010, 183:467-472.
16. Miller D.C., Wei J.T., Dunn R.L., Hollenbeck B.K. Trends in the diffusion of laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Am Med Assoc 2006, 295:2480-2482.
17. Van Poppel H., Da Pozzo L., Albrecht W., Matveev V., Bono A., Borkowski A., et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2007, 51:1606-1615.
18. Thompson R.H., Kaag M., Vickers A., Kundu S., Bernstein M., Lowrance W., et al. Contemporary use of partial nephrectomy at a tertiary care center in the United States. J Urol 2009, 181:993-997.
19. Castleberry A.W., Clary B.M., Migaly J., Worni M., Ferranti J.M., Pappas T.N., et al. Resident education in the era of patient safety: a nationwide analysis of outcomes and complications in resident-assisted oncologic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2013, 20:3715-3724.
20. Davis S.S., Husain F.A., Lin E., Nandipati K.C., Perez S., Sweeney J.F. Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2013, 216:96-104.
21. Raval M.V., Wang X., Cohen M.E., Ingraham A.M., Bentrem D.J., Dimick J.B., et al. The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2011, 212:889-898.
22. Liu J.-J., Maxwell B.G., Panousis P., Chung B.I. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Urology 2013, 82:579-583.
23. Miller D.C., Hollingsworth J.M., Hafez K.S., Daignault S., Hollenbeck B.K. Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses: an emerging quality of care concern?. J Urol 2006, 175:853-857. [discussion 858].
24. Berthelsen C.L. Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample. Top Health Inf Manage 2000, 21:10-23.
25. Parsons J.K., Palazzi K., Chang D., Stroup S.P. Patient safety and the diffusion of surgical innovations: a national analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2013, 27:1674-1680.
26. Spana G., Haber G.-P., Dulabon L.M., Petros F., Rogers C.G., Bhayani S.B., et al. Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases. J Urol 2011, 186:417-421.
27. Cima R.R., Lackore K.A., Nehring S.A., Cassivi S.D., Donohue J.H., Deschamps C., et al. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse ev. Surgery 2011, 150:943-949.