Objective dimensionality reduction method within multi-objective optimisation considering total footprints

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 71, Issue , 2014, Pages 75-86

  Čuček, Lidija ^a   Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír ^b   Kravanja, Zdravko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PANNONIA   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Dimensionality reduction; Footprints; Multi objective optimisation; Regional energy supply chains; Representative objectives method; Total footprints

Indexed keywords

SUPPLY CHAINS;

DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; ENERGY SUPPLY CHAINS; FOOTPRINTS; REPRESENTATIVE OBJECTIVES METHOD; TOTAL FOOTPRINTS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84899481565     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.035     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. S. Agarwal, D. Singh, and K. Thakur Impact of service Quality dimensions towards customer satisfaction in Indian call centers Pac. Bus. Rev. Int. 6 2013 51 64
2. Australian Government, and Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency Australia's Emissions Projections 2012 (accessed 06.09.13.)
3. A. Azapagic Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimisation Chem. Eng. J. 73 1999 1 21 (Pubitemid 29419118)
4. L. Čuček, H. Lam, J. Klemeš, P. Varbanov, and Z. Kravanja Synthesis of regional networks for the supply of energy and bioproducts Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 12 2010 635 645
5. L. Čuček, R. Drobež, B. Pahor, and Z. Kravanja Sustainable synthesis of biogas processes using a novel concept of eco-profit Comput. Chem. Eng. 42 2012 87 100
6. L. Čuček, P.S. Varbanov, J.J. Klemeš, and Z. Kravanja Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains Energy 44 2012 135 145
7. L. Čuček, J.J. Klemeš, and Z. Kravanja A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability J. Clean. Prod. 34 2012 9 20
8. L. Čuček, J.J. Klemeš, P.S. Varbanov, and Z. Kravanja Dealing with high-dimensionality of criteria in multiobjective optimization of biomass energy supply network Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 2013 7223 7239
9. L. De Benedetto, and J. Klemeš LCA as environmental assessment tool in waste to energy and contribution to occupational health and safety Chem. Eng. Transact. 13 2008 343 350
10. D. Djuric Ilic, E. Dotzauer, L. Trygg, and G. Broman Introduction of large-scale biofuel production in a district heating system - an opportunity for reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions J. Clean. Prod. 64 2014 552 561
11. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Risk Management Sustainable Technology 2012 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (accessed 05.09.13.)
12. European Commission Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, L140/16-62 2009 Official Journal of the European Union
13. European Commission, and Directorate-General for the Environment Making Sustainable Consumption and Production a Reality, a Guide for Business and Policy Makers to Life Cycle Thinking and Assessment 2010 (accessed 10.09.13.)
14. M. Finkbeiner Carbon footprinting - opportunities and threats Int. JLife Cycle Assess. 14 2009 91 94
15. GAMS Development Corporation GAMS - a User's Guide 2010 (Washington, DC, US)
16. G. Guillén-Gosálbez A novel MILP-based objective reduction method for multi-objective optimization: application to environmental problems Comput. Chem. Eng. 35 2011 1469 1477
17. Y.Y. Haimes, L.S. Lasdon, and D.A. Wismer On a Bicriterion Formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization IEEE Transact. Syst Man Cybern. SMC-1 1971 296 297
18. IBM IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimizer 2012 (accessed 11.01.13.)
19. M. Kissinger, and D. Gottlieb Place oriented ecological footprint analysis - the case of Israel's grain supply Ecol. Econ. 69 2010 1639 1645
20. J.J. Klemeš, P.S. Varbanov, and D. Huisingh Recent cleaner production advances in process monitoring and optimisation J. Clean. Prod. 34 2012 1 8
21. Z. Kravanja, and L. Čuček Multi-objective optimisation for generating sustainable solutions considering total effects on the environment Appl. Energy 101 2013 67 80
22. H.L. Lam, P. Varbanov, and J. Klemeš Minimising carbon footprint of regional biomass supply chains Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54 2010 303 309
23. H.L. Lam, J.J. Klemeš, and Z. Kravanja Model-size reduction techniques for large-scale biomass production and supply networks Energy 36 2011 4599 4608
24. A.M. Leach, J.N. Galloway, A. Bleeker, J.W. Erisman, R. Kohn, and J. Kitzes A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment Environ. Dev. 1 2012 40 66
25. J.A. Leggett China's Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Policies Congressional Research Service 2011 (accessed 05.09.13.)
26. M. Lenzen, D. Moran, K. Kanemoto, B. Foran, L. Lobefaro, and A. Geschke International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations Nature 486 2012 109 112
27. N. Lior Sustainable energy development: the present (2011) situation and possible paths to the future Energy 43 2012 174 191
28. J.N. Lott, M. Bojarski, J. Kolasa, and G.D. Batten A review of the phosphorus content of dry cereal and legume crops of the world Int. J. Agric. Resour. Govern. Ecol. 8 2009 351 370
29. M.M. Mekonnen, and A.Y. Hoekstra The Green, Blue and Grey Water Footprint of Farm Animals and Animal Products Value of Water: Research Report Series No. 48, Thesis UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education 2010 Delft the Netherlands (accessed 22.01.13.)
30. A. Nemet, J.J. Klemeš, and Z. Kravanja Life span production plant optimisation under varying economic conditions Chem. Eng. Transact. 35 2013 103 108
31. C. Pieragostini, M.C. Mussati, and P. Aguirre On process optimization considering LCA methodology J. Environ. Manag. 96 2012 43 54
32. UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation 2011 Number 383, London, UK (accessed 22.01.13.)
33. A. Rashid, F.M.A. Asif, P. Krajnik, and C.M. Nicolescu Resource conservative Manufacturing: an essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing J. Clean. Prod. 57 2013 166 177
34. J. Sánchez-Chóliz, and R. Duarte Water pollution in the Spanish economy: analysis of sensitivity to production and environmental constraints Ecol. Econ. 53 2005 325 338 (Pubitemid 40707644)
35. Schindler Energy and GHG Footprint, a Big Step Forward 2013 (accessed 13.02.13.)
36. M. Spielmann, C. Bauer, R. Dones, and M. Tuchschmid Transport Services ecoinvent report No. 14 2007 Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories Dübendorf, Switzerland
37. United Nations Environment Programme Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products 2009 (accessed 05.05.13.)
38. P. Varbanov, and F. Friedler P-graph methodology for cost-effective reduction of carbon emissions involving fuel cell combined cycles Appl. Thermal Eng. 28 2008 2020 2029